The off topic thread #2

[Cristiano Ronaldo]

**** me, haven't seen a championship won on a review before. Fedex's celebration wasn't awkward though.

 

[Sozabarus]

And then the whole thing is ruined by Basil Zemplis being the MC.

 

[Cristiano Ronaldo]

Get in Fed!

 

[Cooldude]

**** off and die Basil

 

[Cooldude]

This is the part I hate the most, everyone's ****ing hyped coz the match finished and a bloke just won then the sponsors come in and we have to listen to their BS that no one gives a shit about, FFS

 

[Van_Dyke]

What a bloody game. Thought FedEx was done early in the 5th but what an effort

And then the whole thing is ruined by Basil Zemplis being the MC.

And then that kia guy. Anyone able to translate that?

 

[Cooldude]

And then that kia guy. Anyone able to translate that?

"HI I AM A CHINESE GUY BUT I SOUND LIKE A JAPANESE SPY"

 

[SM]

What an effort for Fed to beat the Rafa! Good stuff.

 

[FAITH]

I liked the kia asian

 

[Cristiano Ronaldo]

What an effort for Fed to beat the Rafa! Good stuff.

You said Fed's form was much better than Rafa's. I would've thought this result wouldn't have been much of a surprise to you

 

[SM]

You said Fed's form was much better than Rafa's. I would've thought this result wouldn't have been much of a surprise to you

It wasn't, my tongue was in my cheek with that post because I knew it'd wind you up.

Apart from one big lapse from Fed in the second set he was on top of Rafa for most of that match.

 

[Cooldude]

One day I'd love to see a winner go "I won you LOST, suck on deez" instead of the circle jerk humble wankfest

 

[SM]

One day I'd love to see a winner go "I won you LOST, suck on deez" instead of the circle jerk humble wankfest

Federer and Nadal are great friends. Why be a poor winner? You've won.

Strange comment from you since the people with that sort of mentality are people you usually whine about.

 

[Stan_Darsh72]

And then the whole thing is ruined by Basil .

EFA

 

[Cristiano Ronaldo]

It wasn't, my tongue was in my cheek with that post because I knew it'd wind you up.

Apart from one big lapse from Fed in the second set he was on top of Rafa for most of that match.

Nah not really, I just wanted the match to live up to the hype. Thankfully it did.

 

[jod23]

Incredible tennis. What a match. I thought Roger was done when down a break in the 5th but to battle back like he did and win, well that's one of his best matches ever.

18.

GOAT.

 

[Cooldude]

Federer and Nadal are great friends. Why be a poor winner? You've won.

Strange comment from you since the people with that sort of mentality are people you usually whine about.

Calm down, it was said in jest, no need to take everything so seriously

 

[jod23]

Also when you look back at the so called big 4 era of Fed/Nadal/Djoker and Murray it's been pretty incredible. Hard to leave out Wawrinka too as he has won 3 majors, just as many as Murray.

But when Roger got his first at Wimbledon in 2003, there has been 53 majors in that time.

48 of the past 53 majors have been won by either Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray or Wawrinka.

The other five were Gaston Gadio winning the French before Nadal showed up. Cilic, Roddick and Del Porto snagging a US open each and then Safin at the Aus Open.

To take that a little further, 42 of the past 53 majors have been won by just three blokes, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. That's pretty incredible.

 

[Cruyff14]

So glad Roger won, I doubt he will be caught.

Djokovic is in with a chance though IMO, albeit small.

 

[Gosha]

So glad Roger won, I doubt he will be caught.

Djokovic is in with a chance though IMO, albeit small.

Would be spewing if that campaigner got anywhere near Federer

 

[chef]

Also when you look back at the so called big 4 era of Fed/Nadal/Djoker and Murray it's been pretty incredible. Hard to leave out Wawrinka too as he has won 3 majors, just as many as Murray.

But when Roger got his first at Wimbledon in 2003, there has been 53 majors in that time.

48 of the past 53 majors have been won by either Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray or Wawrinka.

The other five were Gaston Gadio winning the French before Nadal showed up. Cilic, Roddick and Del Porto snagging a US open each and then Safin at the Aus Open.

To take that a little further, 42 of the past 53 majors have been won by just three blokes, Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. That's pretty incredible.

It's pretty special we've seen these three come through together. All guns. Imagine the slams they would have won if there were in this era alone.

 

[Cruyff14]

Would be spewing if that campaigner got anywhere near Federer

I like Djokovic a lot, same as Rafa, Fed will always be my favourite though.

 

[Loonerty]

It's pretty special we've seen these three come through together. All guns. Imagine the slams they would have won if there were in this era alone.

In any other period of time as well, Murray would probably have won several Grand Slams.

He's not as good as the other three, but it's still crazy that there are three people "above" a player of his quality around.

 

[SM]

Calm down, it was said in jest, no need to take everything so seriously

Your rhetoric seemed to be a genuine complaint, sorry for not getting the joke.

 

[FAITH]

sampras was the best ive seen, but i think roger's gone past him now