Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The style he used to draw her is from Jim Crow era and he whitewashed Osaka and the ref.
He also works for Murdoch.
It’s definitely racist. Pretty ****** up really.
I think people are oversensitive. I saw the drawing and was like, oh yeah, there is a caricature of Serena Williams losing the plot. That was my entire thought process.
Sigh...
I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt that he just stupidly drew Osaka whiter than she actually is. The world loves to get outraged and it’s a vicious cycle really. Serena Williams overreacting to start it off, then the overreaction to her overreaction, then an overreaction to a drawing of her overreaction to finish it off. Basically the worlds ******
I think people are oversensitive. I saw the drawing and was like, oh yeah, there is a caricature of Serena Williams losing the plot. That was my entire thought process.
Sigh...
No doubt there’s an element of overreacting in today’s world. However, this one has just cause.
Generally speaking, I find there’s a common denominator in those who call for calm and quiet in these moments: they’re white males.
Privilege is definitely a thing. I dont believe the illustration was deliberately intended to be racist, far from it. He’s probably ignorant to what that depiction represents, just like many of us over in Australia.
There’s a difference between ignorance and racism. But sadly, to those particularly in the southern USA, it’s an excuse they’d see far too often.
If that cartoon was vetted by someone informed of how it could be perceived, it surely would’ve never gone to print.
That stance absolutely belongs in the Jim Crow era. That’s a caricature from the blackface days. African Americans have endured that type of depiction of them for generations, and I don’t blame them at all if they took offence.
They shouldn’t be minimised or invalidated just because we don’t see it as a problem. In times like this when an uproar occurs, I’d suggest instead of telling them to be quiet, I prefer to listen.
I’m Kent Brockman and that was my 2 cents.
Genuine question then - can you create a caricature of an African-American individual who is angry without being accused of racism? To me it seems an unfortunate combination of circumstance: Serena is a rather muscular individual, in this particular incident she was spitting the dummy and acting like a spoilt brat, so she was depicted in a way that over-emphasised her stature, and her behaviour. Rather than anything inherently racist.
Very valid question SM. I don’t think there’s a clear cut answer. So many variables at play.
Draw them too dark, it can be perceived as blackface. Too light, it could be whitewashing. There’s a balance in the middle there somewhere that can be difficult to find.
I’d say more so it was the stance, and lips etc that caused the damage here. As I said; I doubt it was intentional. Just purely because of the circumstances you mentioned.
This is an outstanding post glenferry23No doubt there’s an element of overreacting in today’s world. However, this one has just cause.
Generally speaking, I find there’s a common denominator in those who call for calm and quiet in these moments: they’re white males.
Privilege is definitely a thing. I dont believe the illustration was deliberately intended to be racist, far from it. He’s probably ignorant to what that depiction represents, just like many of us over in Australia.
There’s a difference between ignorance and racism. But sadly, to those particularly in the southern USA, it’s an excuse they’d see far too often.
If that cartoon was vetted by someone informed of how it could be perceived, it surely would’ve never gone to print.
That stance absolutely belongs in the Jim Crow era. That’s a caricature from the blackface days. African Americans have endured that type of depiction of them for generations, and I don’t blame them at all if they took offence.
They shouldn’t be minimised or invalidated just because we don’t see it as a problem. In times like this when an uproar occurs, I’d suggest instead of telling them to be quiet, I prefer to listen.
I’m Kent Brockman and that was my 2 cents.
There is context that always needs to be added, and the problem here is that the cartoon doesn't. Yes, Serena blew her stack. Unreasonably and unacceptably. But to be fair, Umpire Ramos does have form. He's had complaints made against him previously by female players. No mention is made that across the latter stages of her career, Serena had generally been lauded for her sportsmanship. She was a brat in her youth. So was the seemingly endlessly gentile Roger Federer. So was I. Serena is African-American and female, two groups that are in constant fights for what should be basic understanding and rights at this point in history.Genuine question then - can you create a caricature of an African-American individual who is angry without being accused of racism? To me it seems an unfortunate combination of circumstance: Serena is a rather muscular individual, in this particular incident she was spitting the dummy and acting like a spoilt brat, so she was depicted in a way that over-emphasised her stature, and her behaviour. Rather than anything inherently racist.
Yes, fantastic sportsmanship hereThere is context that always needs to be added, and the problem here is that the cartoon doesn't. Yes, Serena blew her stack. Unreasonably and unacceptably. But to be fair, Umpire Ramos does have form. He's had complaints made against him previously by female players. No mention is made that across the latter stages of her career, Serena had generally been lauded for her sportsmanship. She was a brat in her youth. So was the seemingly endlessly gentile Roger Federer. So was I. Serena is African-American and female, two groups that are in constant fights for what should be basic understanding and rights at this point in history.
The issue here is if that cartoon was drawn for a non-Murdochracy media outlet, it doesn't go to print. The failure, and it will not be looked at as such by the persons responsible, is as much with the editors as Mark Knight. In itself, the cartoon is topical but it's translation is poor, thoughtless and tasteless.
But it was drawn to appeal to a particular population subset, and appeal to them it did.
Threatened a lineswoman.
Great sportsmanship though, right?Threatened a lineswoman.
Made a fool of herself in the final v Stosur.
Something about Flushing Meadows turns her crazy.
There is context that always needs to be added, and the problem here is that the cartoon doesn't. Yes, Serena blew her stack. Unreasonably and unacceptably. But to be fair, Umpire Ramos does have form. He's had complaints made against him previously by female players. No mention is made that across the latter stages of her career, Serena had generally been lauded for her sportsmanship. She was a brat in her youth. So was the seemingly endlessly gentile Roger Federer. So was I. Serena is African-American and female, two groups that are in constant fights for what should be basic understanding and rights at this point in history.
The issue here is if that cartoon was drawn for a non-Murdochracy media outlet, it doesn't go to print. The failure, and it will not be looked at as such by the persons responsible, is as much with the editors as Mark Knight. In itself, the cartoon is topical but it's translation is poor, thoughtless and tasteless.
But it was drawn to appeal to a particular population subset, and appeal to them it did.