- Apr 16, 2008
- 6,441
- 8,144
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- PHX
Davis really has some terrible tats.Discovered today that I actually support the 1980s Denver Nuggets.
Either that or the Crows have joined the NBA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Davis really has some terrible tats.Discovered today that I actually support the 1980s Denver Nuggets.
Either that or the Crows have joined the NBA.
View attachment 600250
View attachment 600252
Fox then put a blanket over Mitchell/Tatum/Markkanen/Kuzma imo
Burning crosses should have been a bad signal.I don't think Fox would appreciate 4 guys with sheets thrown over them chasing him.
Seems very Donald Trump-like.
View attachment 600250
View attachment 600252
Fox then put a blanket over Mitchell/Tatum/Markkanen/Kuzma imo
His efficiency would probably drop without KyrieOh not sure about mitchell should've been ROTY imo.
Give credit to tatum having irving on the team otherwise his scoring would be at least 21ppg.
Oh not sure about mitchell should've been ROTY imo.
Give credit to tatum having irving on the team otherwise his scoring would be at least 21ppg.
nahnah.His efficiency would probably drop without Kyrie
There was a fairly decent sample of that not being the case last year both in the regular season and the playoffs.His efficiency would probably drop without Kyrie
Well his efficiency has dipped this year and he’s getting more shots per game... (Mitchell’s has plummeted), that’s a 35 game sample sizeThere was a fairly decent sample of that not being the case last year both in the regular season and the playoffs.
He was extremely efficient in both scenarios, and he became more productive with more touches.
But he's playing with Kyrie. That's a contradiction to what you said.Well his efficiency has dipped this year and he’s getting more shots per game... (Mitchell’s has plummeted), that’s a 35 game sample size
Trade Kyrie thenBut he's playing with Kyrie. That's a contradiction to what you said.
Someone tried that...didnt really work out too well.Trade Kyrie then
He's literally your entire team atm, congrats!Someone tried that...didnt really work out too well.
thats a bit disrespectful to Morris tbh, him and KyrieHe's literally your entire team atm, congrats!
Clutching at a pretty small straw for a young player that anyone would love to have on their team.His efficiency did drop without Kyrie... his 3pt% dropped a heap...so that was a lie
Melt noted.He's literally your entire team atm, congrats!
I'm not, I said he is on par with the others which is true... clutching at straws would be assuming he would be randomly more productive and have the same efficiency without the teams best player making everything easier for him or assuming his current situation negatively impacts him compared to other rookies in his draft who are playing for crappy teams (it is more likely to be the opposite)Clutching at a pretty small straw for a young player that anyone would love to have on their team.
Melt noted.
Memphis dude said his production would lift if he had more of the ball in a team without a player like kyrie. Which it did. The playoffs last year was a fairly solid example.I'm not, I said he is on par with the others which is true... clutching at straws would be assuming he would be randomly more productive and have the same efficiency without the teams best player making everything easier for him or assuming his current situation negatively impacts him compared to other rookies in his draft who are playing for crappy teams (it is more likely to be the opposite)
A melt comment, nice you're flying here.
yep you have no idea what point im making that much is clear, sorry for not being able to help you there. i have tried but ultimately failed. Markkenan plays in a shell of a team every single game he plays... i hope that helps somewhat. I dont really know what else to say..Memphis dude said his production would lift if he had more of the ball in a team without a player like kyrie. Which it did. The playoffs last year was a fairly solid example.
I'm not really sure what point you're arguing other than trying to split hairs about his 3 point percentage when he was still a super efficient scorer when he had more quality touches. He had 10 games last year in the playoffs where he produced over 20 points in a shell lineup that was missing ball dominant players.
As for the melt comment, sorry, but you're looking up Tatum stats on new years.
There was a fairly decent sample of that not being the case last year both in the regular season and the playoffs.
He was extremely efficient in both scenarios, and he became more productive with more touches.
This was especially evident when he was arguably the best boston player in the philadelphia series and cleveland series. Pretty significant playoffs series' for a 19/20 year old rookie that have conveniently been forgotten about.
As for Fox. No arguments here. He has full control of the ball and the offense though.
As for the melt comment, sorry, but you're looking up Tatum stats on new years.