- May 23, 2012
- 15,496
- 14,231
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspur, New Orleans Pels
Davis really has some terrible tats.
If he moves to LA we can all decry him as a hipster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Davis really has some terrible tats.
It's evident that Tatum's sperm are more efficientyep you have no idea what point im making that much is clear, sorry for not being able to help you there. i have tried but ultimately failed. Markkenan plays in a shell of a team every single game he plays... i hope that helps somewhat. I dont really know what else to say..
I'm such a loser being on bigfooty on New Years, lucky you arent!
I think I understood it fine. You disagreed with Memphis when he said Tatum would produce more if he has more touches/ball dominant guys not taking shots away from him. There was evidence of that being the case just last season. Especially in the playoffs. Markkanen has similar numbers with with no such issue. I think the markkanen post of what you said above is you agreeing with me? So thanks I guess.yep you have no idea what point im making that much is clear, sorry for not being able to help you there. i have tried but ultimately failed. Markkenan plays in a shell of a team every single game he plays... i hope that helps somewhat. I dont really know what else to say..
I'm such a loser being on bigfooty on New Years, lucky you arent!
It's evident that Tatum's sperm are more efficient
Wouldn’t have thought it was incredibly incorrect to say young players will drop in efficiency as their production and role increases a lot, even Kyrie did for a season. I said Marrkenan (however the * you spell this s**t been giving me trouble all night) and Tatum is a coin toss, that’s not an attack on Tatum he’s a very good young player. If you put Tatum on the bulls I’m sure he would average more points but not on the same %... if you put Maarkenan on the Celtics I’m willing to bet his % would increase but his ppg probably dropI think I understood it fine. You disagreed with Memphis when he said Tatum would produce more if he has more touches/ball dominant guys not taking shots away from him. There was evidence of that being the case just last season. Especially in the playoffs. Markkanen has similar numbers with with no such issue. I think the markkanen post of what you said above is you agreeing with me? So thanks I guess.
I'll happily defend Tatum to anyone any time of the day and night. Fine by me. Noones a loser for doing what they want to do and I never said you were. I just find it odd that you're willing to die on this hill for no reason.
Tatum spent a large portion of last season shooting 50-40-85...simple regression to a realistic averages with more volume has probably caused his percentages to drop sure. I don't think that has much to do with Kyrie Irving. He has been a really good efficient scorer with and without Irving.Wouldn’t have thought it was incredibly incorrect to say young players will drop in efficiency as their production and role increases a lot, even Kyrie did for a season. I said Marrkenan (however the **** you spell this s**t been giving me trouble all night) and Tatum is a coin toss, that’s not an attack on Tatum he’s a very good young player. If you put Tatum on the bulls I’m sure he would average more points but not on the same %... if you put Maarkenan on the Celtics I’m willing to bet his % would increase but his ppg probably drop
Why does the sun rise,
why is water wet?
Do either occur? I'm not seeing any evidenceWhy does the sun rise, why is water wet?
How about that third quarter by the Spurs.
Highest score in a quarter by the Spurs since 1993, and 2nd highest all time by the Spurs in the third quarter (scored 47 in 1979 also against the Celtics)
Also this forum upgrade is like my life without nufan tinder stories: incomplete.
Why can’t Ayton get more touches?
Why can’t Ayton get more touches?