Spartan
Brownlow Medallist
Goodes + Richooooo-man
vs
Kornes + Buddy Love
vs
Kornes + Buddy Love
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Goodes + Richooooo-man
vs
Kornes + Buddy Love
or my other option
raines/richo/94k rookie
vs
any defender under 230k/buddy/94k rookie
vs
henderson/buddy/ziebell
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Don't like Kane Cornes in Supercoach, burnt me last year
How about this?
Pavlich + Ryan Houlihan + Andy Otten
OR
Chapman + N. Krakouer/Skipworth + Travis Tuck
Also, does Rich seem a lock for R1?
217 thou problem
Krak or hentch? pros cons?
chapman, skipworth and tuck seem the better option.
how about hodge and mackie vs gilbee and goddard
decided to keep raines.
will be able to hold onto him for longer than henderson.
so
goodes + richo vs kornes + buddy
?!
gilbee and goddard I'm thinking. Mackie might have to toghten up a bit now hunt's gone.
cross & selwood v s tuck & corey?
What was the main consensus with:
Hasleby v Tuck?
Surely both can get numbers, but Hasleby if fit is a certain starter for freo (not so sure about Tuck).
![]()
I think that boils down to just how much you think Selwood is going to explode this year- the other three are all super consistent (and Tuck may even get better scores now that Benny's there to take the big tag).
Damnit- you've almost given me bad thoughts about changing my team now- yikes...
Jeez Spartan- you come up with the tough ones, don't you? I'd be erring on the side of Goodes and Richo (just)- one, Kornes is riskier than the other three in clangerability terms, and two, Buddy is a better chance of going down in value early than the others so can be an upgrade target.
He'll probably end up scoring more though, so the latter option may actually be better- you're unlikely to trade any of these guys out, so perhaps the question should really be who are you more likely to want to trade IN, and choose them (if you see what I'm saying...)- save yourself the trade.
what if i said its now NDS/Richo vs Kornes/Buddy (and 94k rookie defender becomes Dawson).
any buddy love?
does it make the decision easier?
Not really...
If you're aiming to get Buddy in anyway go for Kornes/Buddy. If you're still not sure then Dal/Richo. Dawson will probably not set the world on fire, but should still play the first few games and make some cash
First time since starting this caper I haven't had Dal in my starting side, but I'm now second guessing and thinking about downgrading Judd to one of the $530-540 (or even up to Dal) mids and bolstering my forward line a little more (which is weak as wee-wee at the moment). I know there's some talk about Judd not being worth it (hi Judd_Magic!), but if I follow my own advice then I'm sort of wasting a trade not having him in to begin with.
Ugh.
the rookie backs all suck balls. i have a semi smokey, but even he isnt a lock in the 22. dawson will play a few games, hopefully make enough cash to upgrade one of my midrangers into a premium.
the thing with dal thats a bit of a concern is his sc/dt ratio. in years gone by 100 for dal in dt is a 130+ in sc. this year two of his SC scores are actually less than his DT scores.
so yeh.. settled on kornes/buddy. fingers crossed.
happy with my team.
![]()
Bit of a late one ... Kerr v McLean?
Leaning towards Brock for the tackle count