Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 0
SuperCoach Rd 0 - The Throw Up SC Talk - Rate My Team - Injuries - SC Leagues ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 0 AFF Talk - Preseason 2026 - Rate My Team
No but Tottenham did miss out from 4th when Chelsea fluked the CL.
Better than rewarding the 7th team in the league.Why reward the loser?
![]()
Be more mad
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Fair enough. I have the same thoughts as Moomba on the subject.I respectfully disagree.
Ha, this will never get old. What a night.No but Tottenham did miss out from 4th when Chelsea fluked the CL.
No but Tottenham did miss out from 4th when Chelsea fluked the CL.
So your issue is with rewarding the runner up in a knock out comp with about 8 rounds rather than someone who comes 7 out of 20 and you don't want to promote mediocrity? I agree with Moomba and thistle.I respectfully disagree.
Both are rewarding mediocrity, I just believe one is the lesser of two evils.So your issue is with rewarding the runner up in a knock out comp with about 8 rounds rather than someone who comes 7 out of 20 and you don't want to promote mediocrity? I agree with Moomba and thistle.
You're holding all FA Cup finalists to the standards of a side who yourself admit got the easiest run of the modern era. Logic would suggest that far more often than not an FA Cup finalist has to beat a number of good sides to make it.Both are rewarding mediocrity, I just believe one is the lesser of two evils.
For instance, United would have performed better in the Europa League than Hull this season.
Similarly, if West Ham continue their impressive performances so far this season (big if of course), I'd prefer they get rewarded for consistently playing well over a Hull of last year who had the easiest cup run in the modern era (which of course is no fault's of Hull).
Taking that europa spot away won't change the way teams line up and try and win each round of the cup.
Yes I am. The same can be said for sides that are relegated though but still get that spot. Wigan lost all chance of bouncing straight back into the PL as they had to play extra fixtures in Europe. Championship sides aren't equipped to deal with Europe.You're holding all FA Cup finalists to the standards of a side who yourself admit got the easiest run of the modern era. Logic would suggest that far more often than not an FA Cup finalist has to beat a number of good sides to make it.
It won't change how sides play, but it lowers the chances of a team playing possibly their only ever European games, as they were for us.
Teams can choose not to play in europa, as Portsmouth did when they were relegated.Yes I am. The same can be said for sides that are relegated though but still get that spot. Wigan lost all chance of bouncing straight back into the PL as they had to play extra fixtures in Europe. Championship sides aren't equipped to deal with Europe.
Any time top 5 or 6 clubs met in the final, the extra position went to the next eligible club in the league didn't it?
I think if England want to improve in Europe, they're better off sending clubs who can handle the fixtures.
Kind of defeats the purpose when they elect not to, does it not?Teams can choose not to play in europa, as Portsmouth did when they were relegated.
Swansea and stoke both made the knock outs didn't they?
So your issue is with rewarding the runner up in a knock out comp with about 8 rounds rather than someone who comes 7 out of 20 and you don't want to promote mediocrity? I agree with Moomba and thistle.
Defeats what purpose? If a club has never competed in Europe it's huge for them. If as you say they want to focus on promotion they can do so and 7th gets it.Kind of defeats the purpose when they elect not to, does it not?
I just think you should be sending over your stronger clubs and I consider the stronger club to more consistently come from the league table. Only my opinion of course.
They should. It's this shit attitude that contributes to them failing as a national side. They should be looking for their higher calibre players to be getting as much European experience as possible.Defeats what purpose? If a club has never competed in Europe it's huge for them. If as you say they want to focus on promotion they can do so and 7th gets it.
I don't think England as a body really gives a shit to be honest.
I really like this idea. Winning the FA Cup should be more important than finishing 4th in the league.Put the cat among the pigeons.
Give a Champions league spot to the FA Cup winners and a EUROPA League spot to the league cup winners.
They should. It's this shit attitude that contributes to them failing as a national side. They should be looking for their higher calibre players to be getting as much European experience as possible.
It's not a perfect system - because there is no perfect system.
Again, using West Ham as an example, there are a lot of English lads in that side that would benefit from it.
I was just stating a fact.