The on topic thread

[moomba]

Where have you heard that from? Any player while on loan at a club can be paid by two clubs at once.

while he was a permanent Spurs player.

 

[SM]

.

I was referring to your second sentence where you said players can't be paid by multiple clubs at once.

 

[moomba]

And now I've cleared up what I meant.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

I was referring to your second sentence where you said players can't be paid by multiple clubs at once.

regardless, the story purports him being paid by City and Spurs whilst at Palace. So that's a lie
As far as I can remember we merely paid him out to get him off the books and he moved to Palace for free.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

wrong sport landing the left right goodnight on your captain

multiskilled

 

[Bojan KantKick]

Good story, but not a true one.

Can't be paid by multiple clubs at once. I'm sure he got a payout from us, but by league rules we couldn't pay him while he was a permanent Spurs player.

you can but the money officially goes to the club who pay the player. wage subsidies are common.

 

[Zidane98]

Both Spurs & City subsidised Adebayor's wages while playing at another club in the form of a payout.

 

[SM]

And now I've cleared up what I meant.

Actually you just quoted part of your post as if I was dumb for not reading it.

 

[SM]

Both Spurs & City subsidised Adebayor's wages while playing at another club in the form of a payout.

Apparently you can't do that.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

unfortunately we have had to do it with lots of players.

 

[SM]

unfortunately we have had to do it with lots of players.

Would be interesting to see how it's considered by the player, whether it's a lump sum, or included in any wages paid by their current club. If it's the latter then the player could certainly be considered to be being paid by multiple clubs at once.

 

[moomba]

Actually you just quoted part of your post as if I was dumb for not reading it.

I'm sure you'll get over it.

 

[SM]

I'm sure you'll get over it.

You do realise this is a discussion board. Me responding to your post really shouldn't get you this upset.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

Would be interesting to see how it's considered by the player, whether it's a lump sum, or included in any wages paid by their current club. If it's the latter then the player could certainly be considered to be being paid by multiple clubs at once.

It's paid weekly by the club in Uniteds case. Other clubs may do things differently though.

It is actually included as an option in FM 17.

Southampton always do it to me. Offer 20m for Morgs but want me to pay 35% of his weekly wage.

 

[SM]

It's paid weekly by the club in Uniteds case. Other clubs may do things differently though.

It is actually included as an option in FM 17.

Southampton always do it to me. Offer 20m for Morgs but want me to pay 35% of his weekly wage.

Interesting, didn't think it sounded right to say you can't have a player paid by two clubs.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

Interesting, didn't think it sounded right to say you can't have a player paid by two clubs.

It is extremely common with loans of course but I must admit that I wasn't aware of it in terms of permanent transfers until a few years ago. Of course it only applies to the players first contract with their new club.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

Interesting, didn't think it sounded right to say you can't have a player paid by two clubs.

Magma may know more on this but I'd assume that it is common practice in Italy with players that are owned by multiple clubs.

 

[Magma]

loans it's fine. one club can either subsidise the wages, or it's split a certain way. absolutely no idea when it comes to bonuses and whatnot.

two clubs in the premier league can not pay someone who is under permanent contract to another club. that would constitute third party ownership. if we were paying a % of adebayor's wages while he was permanently signed, we could have a say in where he plays, who he plays against, etc etc.

Magma may know more on this but I'd assume that it is common practice in Italy with players that are owned by multiple clubs.

italy removed co-ownership about 18 months ago. all the deals were sent to the usual blind auction where the highest bidder won the rights and owned them outright. for example, berardi started his career at sassuolo. juve then bought a % of his rights for about 4 mil and sent luca marrone to sassuolo. they loaned him back to sassuolo. but once italy ruled that co ownerships were done, sassuolo bought him outright, but allowed zaza to go to juve and left juve with the purchase option.

confusing it was. blast to take advantage of on fm in the day though.

 

[Bojan KantKick]

loans it's fine. one club can either subsidise the wages, or it's split a certain way. absolutely no idea when it comes to bonuses and whatnot.

two clubs in the premier league can not pay someone who is under permanent contract to another club. that would constitute third party ownership. if we were paying a % of adebayor's wages while he was permanently signed, we could have a say in where he plays, who he plays against, etc etc.



italy removed co-ownership about 18 months ago. all the deals were sent to the usual blind auction where the highest bidder won the rights and owned them outright. for example, berardi started his career at sassuolo. juve then bought a % of his rights for about 4 mil and sent luca marrone to sassuolo. they loaned him back to sassuolo. but once italy ruled that co ownerships were done, sassuolo bought him outright, but allowed zaza to go to juve and left juve with the purchase option.

confusing it was. blast to take advantage of on fm in the day though.

That makes sense. So two prem teams can't do it but a prem team could do it with overseas clubs.

Must be a glitch in FM that they let you do it between two prem teams.

 

[Magma]

That makes sense. So two prem teams can't do it but a prem team could do it with overseas clubs.

Must be a glitch in FM that they let you do it between two prem teams.

i mean, i could be wrong. that's just how i always understood the rules.

i know that with adebayor that we didnt contribute wages, we basically bundled up a % of his wages and gave it to him outright to bugger off.

 

[moomba]

And sold him cheap to Spurs so they had a bit more money to pay him what he wanted.

Didn't even have the decency to buy us dinner first

Players still get the money, it's just can't be done as a wage any more.

 

[Magma]

getting **** off money before getting overpaid at another job. the dream.

 

[SM]

getting **** off money before getting overpaid at another job. the dream.

In what other profession can you get paid so much to literally do nothing.

 

[go you pups]

In what other profession can you get paid so much to literally do nothing.

Snobby kids living off their wealthy parents/inheritances?

 

[Magma]

In what other profession can you get paid so much to literally do nothing.

being a kardashian