Remove this Banner Ad

The on topic thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jatz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not sure where the vanity project thing is coming from other than being a cliche of choice for anyone that doesn't like them foreign owners. It's an investment, and it's looking like a pretty good one.

1) If 1 game in 9 years doesn't say "vanity project" then I don't know what does.

2) There's nothing wrong with foreign investment. You get shitty people both local and foreign who own clubs (Oystons, Winkleman, Ken Bates). When your owners are responsible for massive human rights abuses then you're owners are shit people. That article Cooksen posted hits the nail on the head for a lot of things regarding City and your owners and yet you're still in denial.

I think we have three or four Abu Dhabi businesses on our books. Don't know if they are government owned or not. But we are a very popular team in the region, we do travel there regularly and our chairman and owner do have decent contacts in the region.

You're owned by the heads of Abu Dhabi and you're immensely popular in Abu Dhabi? I have to go to the laboratory to figure this one out.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

But you were ok with Australia buying diesel from Singapore which shows how little you care about human rights regardless lol

If you can show me that the company who exports diesel to Australia is responsible from human rights abuses I'll concede.
 
Aha! Japan the evil whaling country.
Another petition.
Then there's South Korea whose FA slipped FIFA some nice money under the table in 2002. It just gets worse and worse.
 
1) If 1 game in 9 years doesn't say "vanity project" then I don't know what does.

2) There's nothing wrong with foreign investment. You get shitty people both local and foreign who own clubs (Oystons, Winkleman, Ken Bates). When your owners are responsible for massive human rights abuses then you're owners are shit people. That article Cooksen posted hits the nail on the head for a lot of things regarding City and your owners and yet you're still in denial.



You're owned by the heads of Abu Dhabi and you're immensely popular in Abu Dhabi? I have to go to the laboratory to figure this one out.

Someone buying as club as a vanity project would surely be there every week getting his face in the papers and taking the plaudits from the supporters. As he said from the outset he bought the club as a long term investment, and it's looking a pretty good one for him.

Like I said I believe the purchase was a personal investment, and I've seen no evidence to suggest otherwise. So I'll base my assessment of our owner on what he has done or been accused of doing. I presume if the writer of that article had anything on Mansour worth writing about he would have done so rather than focus on a relative that has no involvement in the club.

Have you signed a petition against the Liverpool Abu Dhabi academy? I presume that could only have been done as a partnership between club and government.
 
If you can show me that the company who exports diesel to Australia is responsible from human rights abuses I'll concede.
You're ok with our country importing with a country below Qatar on the human rights list. If that's ok with you then it truly is just a front for man city hate.

Unless your protesting to the government for us to stop all our dealings with Singapore you don't have a leg to stand on pointing fingers elsewhere
 
You're ok with our country importing with a country below Qatar on the human rights list. If that's ok with you then it truly is just a front for man city hate.

Unless your protesting to the government for us to stop all our dealings with Singapore you don't have a leg to stand on pointing fingers elsewhere

It depends on who the company is. From what I can see most of the petroleum exporters in Singapore are worldwide corporations like Caltex. This is a football forum btw how you fill your car up is totally irrelevant.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Someone buying as club as a vanity project would surely be there every week getting his face in the papers and taking the plaudits from the supporters. As he said from the outset he bought the club as a long term investment, and it's looking a pretty good one for him.

Like I said I believe the purchase was a personal investment, and I've seen no evidence to suggest otherwise. So I'll base my assessment of our owner on what he has done or been accused of doing. I presume if the writer of that article had anything on Mansour worth writing about he would have done so rather than focus on a relative that has no involvement in the club.

Have you signed a petition against the Liverpool Abu Dhabi academy? I presume that could only have been done as a partnership between club and government.

Human Rights Watch believes the club is being used to promote UAE's image :


http://keirradnedge.com/2016/08/17/james-dorsey-mancity-owner/

I guess you'll claim that HRW are also biased.
 
Last edited:
It depends on who the company is. From what I can see most of the petroleum exporters in Singapore are worldwide corporations like Caltex. This is a football forum btw how you fill your car up is totally irrelevant.
Not really irrelevant when human rights is what's being preached and a country worse than Qatar is deemed OK to import from
 
Human Rights Watch believes the club is being used to promote Yale's image :


http://keirradnedge.com/2016/08/17/james-dorsey-mancity-owner/

I guess you'll claim that HRW are also biased.
It's never been a secret that the club feel that how it is run reflects on Abu Dhabi. But I'm not sure of the logic behind that claim. The only publicity Abu Dhabi tends to get in relation to Man City is negative.

It's probably the reason Khaldoon and Simon Pearce are involved. It's almost certainly why Al Fahim was given the flick early in the piece. And explains a lot towards how we approach the media.
 
Not really irrelevant when human rights is what's being preached and a country worse than Qatar is deemed OK to import from

Unless the company that Australia is importing from is involved in human rights abuse you have absolutely no point whatsover.

I buy clothing from the USA but cannot stand Trump and his government. The two things are completely separate.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's never been a secret that the club feel that how it is run reflects on Abu Dhabi. But I'm not sure of the logic behind that claim. The only publicity Abu Dhabi tends to get in relation to Man City is negative.

It's probably the reason Khaldoon and Simon Pearce are involved. It's almost certainly why Al Fahim was given the flick early in the piece. And explains a lot towards how we approach the media.

Why do you think Human Rights Watch are concerned ?
 
We need Sheffield Wed or Sheffield Utd back the EPL. Why?

Any team being funded by jet fuel money will not be able to melt a team from the City of Steel Beams
 
Elysse Perry has got me awe-struck too.
Went to school with my sister. Has a horrible voice, but other than that pretty perfect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom