Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Random Thoughts Thread Part 1

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
The rules are the same as much as history can allow. The UK has a unique structure when it comes to sport as you know, yet they have complied with and set up leagues just to assuage that idea. If the home countries didn't exist in the first place, most 'international' sport wouldn't have existed.
Yeah I understand the "home countries" stuff, no issue there. The part I disagree with is having different rules for different "shall we say teams" in different championships depending on what suits them best.
Once upon a time, not that long ago actually, Victorian clubs had a 50 game father son rule (think Jonathan Brown here) yet we had a grand father rule that operated under a very different set of rules just because we joined "later". A 50 games for the "Magpies" would have been the right thing to do IMO. The point I am trying to make is that once a competition is set up there can only be one set of rules.
Back then only one team per country qualified, plus the previous year's winner. As both Celtic and Liverpool could qualify for the European cup etc then they had to be treated as two separate entities and not one for one competition and two for another depending on what suited their circumstances best. Had the two leagues joined, as both Celtic and Rangers "sort of" tried to do at various stages, then it would have been a totally different story.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Kids is my favourite movie, well, was as a teenager. I think that mostly has to do with Harmony Korine though

Yeah he can EAD too. ;)

Though I do kind of like Ken Park which they both worked on.
 
So Doctor Feel did something like this recently so I thought why not...

Option 1: stay in current job, been with business for five years and current role about two years, and definitely the best full time job I've had in terms of work/life balance and general ability to get through the day without murdering people. It's also nice to have been with a company long term (long service leave is an appealing concept, for example).

Option 2: take new job with a different business, on about the same salary (but with less opportunity for shift penalties so potentially less take-home pay) and a 2.5 hour shorter working week (really appealing for some reason) with more opportunity for creativity in the job role, but probably a fair bit more accountability for any creative failures. Also, it'd be a generally nicer environment, I think.

Thoughts?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

**** long term jobs, take the new one, and own your work
 
So Doctor Feel did something like this recently so I thought why not...

Option 1: stay in current job, been with business for five years and current role about two years, and definitely the best full time job I've had in terms of work/life balance and general ability to get through the day without murdering people. It's also nice to have been with a company long term (long service leave is an appealing concept, for example).

Option 2: take new job with a different business, on about the same salary (but with less opportunity for shift penalties so potentially less take-home pay) and a 2.5 hour shorter working week (really appealing for some reason) with more opportunity for creativity in the job role, but probably a fair bit more accountability for any creative failures. Also, it'd be a generally nicer environment, I think.

Thoughts?

Does option two have much room to progress if that's what you're looking for? If so, being held more responsible for your actions will give you a good way to show your skills to the company and move up through the ranks if suitable.
 
Does option two have much room to progress if that's what you're looking for? If so, being held more responsible for your actions will give you a good way to show your skills to the company and move up through the ranks if suitable.


Well, it's a smaller organisation so in pure numeric terms higher roles are going to be less commonly available. And I know I've been within a bee's dick of higher appointments at the current place because I have a good rep. So moving would mean being back near the bottom of a ladder. But probably a more attractive ladder.
 
From the SMH's Fitz Files and the What They Said column

THE PENNY DROPS

Steve Waugh spoke at a lunch at the Opera House last week, and was asked when he knew that his career was truly over. He replied that it occurred a year or so after his retirement when he was going for a walk with his five-year-old son in the Shire, when they ran into Ricky Ponting going for a walk. The two long-time teammates chatted for a bit and then said their goodbyes. Noting his son being a bit quiet afterwards, Steve asked him what was on his mind? ''Dad,'' he said. ''How do you know Ricky Ponting?!?!''


Usain Bolt on his time in Beijing: "I was able to get any lady I wanted … I could walk into a party and take my pick. I would go into a club and think, 'Hmm, a'ight, which one? You? You? Oh, you! Let's do this.'"

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/sport/the-fitz-files/cheat-one-day-and-hero-the-next-20131108-2x6fe.html#ixzz2k82948Rc
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

So Doctor Feel did something like this recently so I thought why not...

Option 1: stay in current job, been with business for five years and current role about two years, and definitely the best full time job I've had in terms of work/life balance and general ability to get through the day without murdering people. It's also nice to have been with a company long term (long service leave is an appealing concept, for example).

Option 2: take new job with a different business, on about the same salary (but with less opportunity for shift penalties so potentially less take-home pay) and a 2.5 hour shorter working week (really appealing for some reason) with more opportunity for creativity in the job role, but probably a fair bit more accountability for any creative failures. Also, it'd be a generally nicer environment, I think.

Thoughts?

Sounds like you would enjoy either option. Spoilt for choice there, I would go for the option that has the best chance of career progression, if that is your thing.
 
Meanwhile, on Battlefield 4.

ku-xlarge.gif
 
I wonder if Rob Lucas will smugly use parliamentary privilege to effect regime change at his beloved Westies?


If instant karma was an actual thing, then Lucas is reaping a big, steaming bowl of it right now.

There's also a definite weirdness to the board's reluctance to call in the cops or make accusations too.
Makes you wonder who knew what about the vanishing cash.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top