Eddie Dingle
Moving chairs
Oh and Marcia>>>Cindy>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Ugly Jan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Bubble Tea is horrid. Literally horrid.
Oh and Marcia>Carol>>>>>>Alice
Interesting never read much about him didn't know about his record...Or perhaps the exact opposite.
I spent a bit of time reading about this case a few years ago, Carter's a lucky man to be walking around today. Colour was not Carter's problem in this case, if anything it was to his advantage. A white man with his record before and after the shootings would have probably not attracted the support necessary to have freed him after a trial, a re-trial, and a failed appeal.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I had a sinking feeling after the runout....but at the wacca we just shouldn't lose....lol, whats the bet we lose this test and end up drawing the series.
lol, whats the bet we lose this test and end up drawing the series.
1 person = everybody...raman logicLOL one top order run out and... EVERYBODY LOSES THEIR MIND!
He has pictures....its the only explanation....Watson - what a waste of a test match spot. How can a batsman be retained when he continually is exposed to the same weakness?
Yep I'm done. Phil Hughes next test pls.Wow watson where have I seen that before
1 person = everybody...raman logic
Who bats at 3 if Watson gets dropped for Faulkner? Watson isn't being played as an all-rounder and therefore shouldn't be replaced by one.He has pictures....its the only explanation....
can not wait for him to be dropped for faulkner
Watson bowls broWho bats at 3 if Watson gets dropped for Faulkner? Watson isn't being played as an all-rounder and therefore shouldn't be replaced by one.
Watson - what a waste of a test match spot. How can a batsman be retained when he continually is exposed to the same weakness?
I dont have problem with hughes but we who do we bowl ....Yep I'm done. Phil Hughes next test pls.
I agree with you about number 3 we havent had one for a whileWINOCOP
He bowled 2 overs in 2 innings at the GABBA and 9 overs over 2 innings at Adelaide. By comparison, Stokes bowled 25 overs in Adelaide. He bowls as a part-timer, not an all-rounder.
Even if he was bowling as an all-rounder who would you bat at 3? Faulkner isn't up to batting higher than 8, let alone 3. This is assuming that a keeper is at 7.
All the talk since Watson went up the order was that he demanded to bat there. In fact, there was discussion that Watson was whiteanting openers (Cowan maybe?) so that he could bat there.I agree with you about number 3 we havent had one for a while
it baffles me how watson gets a game as they do want him to bowl more but his body wont let him....
great teamAll the talk since Watson went up the order was that he demanded to bat there. In fact, there was discussion that Watson was whiteanting openers (Cowan maybe?) so that he could bat there.
Obviously Watson's influence in the dressing room has been reduced with Haddin and Boof coming in, but I think Watson himself is the big issue here. He demands to bat up the order, and the selectors don't have the testicular fortitude to change it.
Doolan is the best natural number 3 in the country at the moment.
Would out: Watson, Bailey and in: Doolan, Faulkner please you?
Rogers
Warner
Doolan
Clarke
Smith
Haddin
Faulkner
Johnson
Siddle
Harris
Lyon
I'd rather play Henriques at 6 if the selectors are hell bent on an all rounder.I dont have problem with hughes but we who do we bowl ....
watson bowls overs as part of the rotation...hence why I would rather faulkner..
we lose a genuine batsmen but is watson a batsmen let alone a number 3...
then the next question is who is our number 3.....the only guys I could suggest bailey clarke or possibly haddin


