Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Hawthorn v Sydney - Rd 2 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Hawks at 58% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists »
Who on earth would rip from youtube? people that still go to blockbuster?Anything above 256kps is a-ok but just dont rip from youtube
A lot of my friends do unfortunately, though Spotify is changing that.Who on earth would rip from youtube? people that still go to blockbuster?
Fair dinkum everything is available in lossless formats if you know where to look
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
64k would be absolutely terrible. 128 to 265 is noticible and 265 to 320 is less so. 320 to lossless isn't noticable at all in my experience.Honestly, my hearing must be bad because I can't tell the difference between 64kps and 256.
I reckon it's noticable, lossless files going through a decent sound system sound fuller, cleaner to me64k would be absolutely terrible. 128 to 265 is noticible and 265 to 320 is less so. 320 to lossless isn't noticable at all in my experience.
My media library is all in 64kbps.
320 sounds great on my aiaiai tmasI reckon it's noticable, lossless files going through a decent sound system sound fuller, cleaner to me
I find it obviously ordinary when people have ipods & other mp3 players docked I seem to notice lack of bass etc. but that may be to do with quality of stereo's being used also.
Of course 320 is fine on portable devices with crap little earphones that's about where they sit with me
The fact I know a mp3 rip actually shaves off audio information sits in my mind & as a half-assed musician it offends my sensibilities even if certain frequencies are only audible to the local cat n' dog community.320 sounds great on my aiaiai tmas
Apple earbuds are always going to give you shit quality even if its lossless
The equipment matters more than the file when it comes to 320/lossless tier
I was a mod on a now defunct music sharing forum for three years I was the least nerdy of the bunchCarn it makes little to no difference unless you're a gigantic nerd
Get a load of this guy, guys, he was a mod on an internet forum. LOL.I was a mod on a now defunct music sharing forum for three years I was the least nerdy of the bunch
These guys would have mp3 burning ceremonies if possibleGet a load of this guy, guys, he was a mod on an internet forum. LOL.
Remember having a cupboard full of those 50 pack cd spindles loaded with shit burns from limewire and Morpheus.. 128kbps albumwraps lolI remember back in the day (about 2004) being in friends cars, and they would burn CD "mixtapes" (as was the style at the time).
Some of the songs I could tell were sourced from 96kbps mp3s. They sounded horrible, but my friends just looked me like I was crazy when I would go on about how bad it sounded.
On WinMX, Kazaa and Morpheus, 96kbps was pretty common pretty common in the early-mid 2000s. It took a bit more searching to find a higher bitrate sometimes.
Not even those people would think a 64kbps mp3 sounded acceptable.
The hat has arrived, it is far more hideous than you could possible imagine. The brim has some sort of suede on it. Pics later.


