I've never gone political on this forum, but I happened to watch this the last few episodes of Q&A and won't be watching it again.
The opinions raised during the discussion are supposed to be presented to a national audience backed by research, instead it all just seemed what the panelists think and feel about certain topics subject to their own life experiences, which they're not an expert in. Shouldn't the most qualified, well-versed and expert opinion be brought onto the panel instead?
It didn't seem grounded in any objective, scientific, quantitative way by any of the panelists, but it passes as "entertainment" for the masses and that's okay.
The opinions raised during the discussion are supposed to be presented to a national audience backed by research, instead it all just seemed what the panelists think and feel about certain topics subject to their own life experiences, which they're not an expert in. Shouldn't the most qualified, well-versed and expert opinion be brought onto the panel instead?
It didn't seem grounded in any objective, scientific, quantitative way by any of the panelists, but it passes as "entertainment" for the masses and that's okay.
you flick over to commercial tv and have a choice between my kitchen rules, im a celebrity get me out of here and married at first sight or some shit
q&a might not be the font of all wisdom but at least it gets people thinking
