Here's another fact clarified: I'm not a he.
Okay, "that person" said.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

System Upgrade - Search is back! - Post feedback.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Here's another fact clarified: I'm not a he.

I'll need them soon if this level of posting keeps upYou're on drugs today SC !!

I am not suggesting we give him a free pass, I think he should move on at the end of the season. I have always been annoyed that it was an Essendon dog act that injured him and ultimately cost us a couple of years from Carrots.We can't keep bringing this up though as much as I agree. It was 2 years ago. He's not getting any younger.
You still haven't given me one example which illustrates Bell isn't in the future plans of CFC.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'll need them soon if this level of posting keeps up![]()

No that's your opinion of him. You said you don't think Mick rates him. And you haven't showed me one example where Mick has illustrated this.I just did, he makes wrong decisions at times (much like Robinson does), instead of the dish-off to a player in a better position he tries to take on not one defender but two and ends up getting caught and turns it over.
I'll share them with you.
It's a little hard to know if a poster is male or female too, maybe BF needs a button on the avatars that reflect that position.
No that's your opinion of him. You said you don't think Mick rates him. And you haven't showed me one example where Mick has illustrated this.
It doesn't really matter but etsal1 is as practical about things as you'll get.
Mixes facts and reasoning very well indeed.
So naturally Walker, Simpson, Buckley and other players Mick has screamed at on the boundary will be moved on as well?Like when he tears strips of him on the boundary line ??
So naturally Walker, Simpson, Buckley and other players Mick has screamed at on the boundary will be moved on as well?
Harks, the sex of the poster is irrelevant to me, more interested in what they have to say and why.

He blows a rocket up all of them for varied reasons but he seems to be on Bell's case for the same thing. Either Malthouse isn't selling the message well enough or Bell isn't wanting to listen to it.
) and re-injured his finger. All signs of the coach not rating you.
Now you're just clutching at straws.
Bell was playing great footy until he got injured. Then we rushed him back v Collingwood (which of course you only do when the coach doesn't rate you) and re-injured his finger. All signs of the coach not rating you.
![]()
Point well argued. etsal1 might wanna reconsider her use of that damned grape.

huh?Point well argued. etsal1 might wanna reconsider her use of that damned grape.
Clubs make bad trade decisions. In the past that's been us Mclean, Mansfield etc. Sometimes it's not us, Richmond/Hampson, thanks.
When you suggest trading a player who is regularly getting a game with us or isn't and is young and was rated as a junior and people say" nah he's got no trade value", just remember, there are clubs out there who make poor decisions, and we need to be the club that feeds on clubs like that!
Not all clubs is good judges, list managers, traders.
Allright, you have your view, I have mine, we all see things differently. Let's put this one on ice for the moment, we can reassess it again after he gets back and plays a few matches.
I'll leave you with this last thought though, can Bell & Robinson play in the team at the same time ??
You are going to have to keep us updated with this kid.
....
4 goals a week... sweethttp://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/a...ndon-on-saturday/story-fni5f9de-1226974343019
"...Second year forward Mason Shaw has been more damaging - kicking 12 goals in the past three weeks - but Walsh believes it’s still “a little bit early” to hand the 20 year old an AFL debut..."
