Remove this Banner Ad

The Riddle - Biglands

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The Toolman

Team Captain
Joined
Feb 15, 2005
Posts
338
Reaction score
0
Location
Melbourne
Other Teams
Crows, Bays.
What is 199cm tall. Weighs 104kg. Has played a tad under 100 games. Is 28 yrs of age (prime). Is athletic and is probably the most imposing looking speciman on a football field. And still has no idea what to do on a footy field?

Answer: Biglands.

I know Biglands has his supporters here, but please start thinking rationally. As soon as Matty Clarke is ready, he must be rushed back into the side at the expense of Rhett Biglands.

The stats tell us that he had 8 posessions and made 4 clangers. That's 50%. What the stats do not tell us, is that one clangar in particular in the first quarter was the initial point when the game turned.

But even more damning, was that late in the last quarter, when we just couldn't find a way to get a goal, Biglands was at his most inept. I was sitting in the new stand (as a guest of a Cats supporter. Damn, I'll drink their beer and wine and eat their food!!!) Brett Reilly had just marked the ball late in the game just on the flank about 55m out. Obviously we had tried everything to get a goal. And it was obvious that the only way to get it was for a bomb outside 50 or a contested mark. The Cats had all other options covered. Reilly was tired, as all players were, and so he was never going to kick a bomb. He hung onto the ball looking for an option. You could see he was thinking 'I need a big tall down there to take a mark'. There was a paddock behind the conjestion. Biglands was about 20 metres wide of Reilly and he was the one that should have busted a gut to get down to the goal square to make a contest. What did this lump of meat do? He stood there. Just stood there next to his opponent. Happy to let someone else do the work. In the end, Reilly got the ball to Welsh who promptly kicked a point.

My point being is that Rhett Biglands doesn't think. He doesn't use his massive frame and he doesn't use his tiny brain. Critics of Matty Clarke always bring out the old chestnut that he doesn't take marks around the ground. Clarkey does work hard. He makes a contest and he is a tap ruckman par excellence. Rhett Biglands averages one mark per game and does little else.

It's time to go....Rhett!
 
I have been dead set against playing Clarke this year. I don't like him as a player & I believe we should be selecting for the future. Clarke is certainly NOT the future.

BUT............

Biglands was very poor on Saturday; both in the centre square ruckwork & in general field play. That shanked kick in the 1st quarter was..... well pure Biglands.

I would like to see Maric or Meesen get a run but at 7/5 I can certainly see the argument for going with the experienced man.
 
Just a very dumb footballer. Unfortunately his superb physique will never adequately compensate for his total lack of footy smarts. Will never be more than a serviceable player.
 
I have to admit I've never been a Biglands fan. He had a pretty good 2002, but otherwise has been a source of constant frustration. As Knuckles Kerley would say, "HE HAS NO FOOTY BRAIN..." and I might add very little footy skill either.

The sooner Maric or Meesen are AFL-ready, the better-off the team will be, IMO. However, that looks quite a way away.

I would expect Biglands to be our 2nd ruckman until sometime during the middle of next season when Maric/Meesen will most likely be ready.

Thank Christ that Benny Hudson has come on like he has. He has been a revelation this season.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Biglands should dominate, or at least hold his own. He is a HUGE man, and has shown he can take big marks and has a long kick. I have NO IDEA why he decides to play the way he does? I am not a fan of Clarke at all but maybe he needs to be put into the team, gee i would love Brogan right now!

Maric and Meesen are not ready for AFL footy yet, give them time... big blokes usually develop later and the way we are travelling, it would be foolish to chuck them in. If we were 2-10 then maybe....

I have heard good reports about their progress in the SANFL, especially about Maric, seems to be already a big stocky lad and is in alright form. I would wait until next year at the earliest, depending on whether we pick up a good ruckman or not.

Huddo has always been a favourite of mine, at North he dominated just about every game, and always put in 110%. I wish we had two of him
 
Wayne's-World said:
Biglands you say - MEH! :o


Well I have to admit defeat. We discussed this early on in the year WW and were opposing views. But I now see what you mean. No bloody brain.
I saw what I thought was a quality forward in him last year but obviously only on a couple of occasions. Thats not good enough with a body such as his. The only thing is he wont be delisted because unless we trade we are stuck with him until someone else steps up.

As others have said Clarks last year and no future so the meh has to stay.
 
Markthirtytwo said:
Well I have to admit defeat. We discussed this early on in the year WW and were opposing views. But I now see what you mean. No bloody brain.
I saw what I thought was a quality forward in him last year but obviously only on a couple of occasions. Thats not good enough with a body such as his. The only thing is he wont be delisted because unless we trade we are stuck with him until someone else steps up.

As others have said Clarks last year and no future so the meh has to stay.
;) Sad but true
 
Wayne's-World said:
;) Sad but true

Sad but true & i have finally realized that Biggles will not become what i expected him to become at the start of the year.

I now cringe my eyes shut tight when ever he comes within range of that funny oval thing called a football. :(
 
noddy said:
Sad but true & i have finally realized that Biggles will not become what i expected him to become at the start of the year.

I now cringe my eyes shut tight when ever he comes within range of that funny oval thing called a football. :(
So can anyone explain why WE MUST keep him - I don't believe the "Clarkes retiring line" - amazing how players stand up to fill the breach - would we really lose anything?? - Really.???....
 
I remember a couple of years back when he and Doc were the top two in hitouts in the AFL. He was also crticised then for not doing enough around the ground. His response was that he was a tap ruckman so he didnt have to. He should have been thrown out immediately with that attitude. Thank God Jimmy has finally come up trumps and discovered the 2m tall rover!
 
ignoranus said:
I remember a couple of years back when he and Doc were the top two in hitouts in the AFL. He was also crticised then for not doing enough around the ground. His response was that he was a tap ruckman so he didnt have to. He should have been thrown out immediately with that attitude. Thank God Jimmy has finally come up trumps and discovered the 2m tall rover!


Firstly welcome to the board. Yes sorry state of affairs that one.
Downhill from here with the biggles boy.
 
Another poor game from him.

Lets try to get Brogan via three way deal with some other club who want Biglands and have something Port want. Ie Collingwood and Didak (more than a straight swap would be needed of course)

Brogan can help Hudson until Meesen and Maric develop.

Rhetts kicking is very bad at the moment.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom