Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Just have seen how he acts and talks and worked out his highly he rates himselfYou obviously know him yeah?
Because people like to talk down Jack for some reason.Why do these conversations still occur? Nick easily.
Jacks just about the smartest and most beautifully skilled two sided player I’ve ever seen,
Sam Mitchell?
Only because they’re cousins. If they weren’t there would be no reason to compare the two. However, seeing that the question has been asked - yes, Nick easily.Why do these conversations still occur? Nick easily.
That couldnt be more wrong. Jack hasnt played as a set full forward for 4-5 years.
I mean youre not wrong that his not a true CHF like those 2. But he does move up the ground, he does play as a link player reguallry. Hes not the big contested mark playing up the hald back line, but he regularly is the player up in the forward half he links up and then passes the ball to the players runnning past.He doesn't play a true CHF role like Riewoldt or Richo did where he roams up the ground to provide that link man marking target, he's still a guy that is most effective playing closer to goals.
Not that it makes him a bad player, he's still good in that role but he doesn't have the impact on games that Nick did unless he kicks a bag.
No offence to Nick, but I am not sure how he got such an incredible reputation as a footballer when as a KP forward he just could not kick for goal properly.
I know I am biased but Jack was a better goal kicker, smarter footballer, and better skilled all round. Nick was for sure a better athlete
There is literally 1% difference in their career accuracy
Richmond fans never cease to amaze me.
If you think nick was as good a kick for goal as jack is you are deluded
I said he was a better kick for goalIf Jack is miles better why is his career accuracy 62% to Nicks 61%? 1% is nothing.
Because people like to talk down Jack for some reason.
Not being as good overall as Nick isnt a bad thing. Jack is a star.
Yeh exactly, he'd be in my top 5 of the 2000s for sure.He is and to be fair, 90% of forwards who have played in the last 20 years wouldn’t be near Nick’s standard, so it’s not a bad place to be. He’s a great forward regardless.