No. But maybe he is the second batsman?Is the keeper really a test level keeper either?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
No. But maybe he is the second batsman?Is the keeper really a test level keeper either?
This and while the players may not be up to it they haven't chosen the best players anyway ie. no Kwahaja or Doolan.Thing is that the selectors can still stick to the basics: six batsmen, one keeper, four bowlers. It works for a reason.
The theory of picking two half-batsmen who are also half-bowlers, because if you add the halves together you get a batsman and a bowler, really isn't working out that well.Thing is that the selectors can still stick to the basics: six batsmen, one keeper, four bowlers. It works for a reason.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'm still pissed at Hussey btw.
I reckon his retirement threw out a lot of the plans the selectors had for India and the Ashes.
it definately wasn't good timing that's for sure but sometimes that's the way it goes.

I'm still pissed at Hussey btw.
I reckon his retirement threw out a lot of the plans the selectors had for India and the Ashes.
Both Ponting and Hussey would have gone fine in India. Ponting's weakness was clearly against top quality pace bowling, of which india have none.
Both Ponting and Hussey would have gone fine in India. Ponting's weakness was clearly against top quality pace bowling, of which india have none.
Ponting's 14 tests in India yielded just one century and an average of 26.48.Both Ponting and Hussey would have gone fine in India. Ponting's weakness was clearly against top quality pace bowling, of which india have none.
Sorry, but that's a dumb stance to take. Hussey was 37 when he retired. The fact Australia planned poorly for the possibility of him retiring is not his problem.I'm still pissed at Hussey btw.
I reckon his retirement threw out a lot of the plans the selectors had for India and the Ashes.
Sorry, but that's a dumb stance to take. Hussey was 37 when he retired. The fact Australia planned poorly for the possibility of him retiring is not his problem.
Expecting him to hold on for 14 more tests when his heart isn't in it is equally as dumb.
He retired to spend more time with his family, can't really hold that against him.
Not dumb for believing it and although it definitely hurts the side I don't think you should be pissed at Hussey in the slightest.Everybody expected Hussey to be red-hot keen for the Ashes. I don't think believing that is 'dumb'.
Not dumb for believing it and although it definitely hurts the side I don't think you should be pissed at Hussey in the slightest.
The old "I'm not mad, just disappointed"Yeah I'm not 'really' pissed at Hussey, love him too much, but I'm annoyed at the timing of his decision (even if it was for family reasons).

Hussey would still be there if it wasn't for the behind the scenes politics.
I don't think Clarke was one of the ones who wanted to dump Lyon for this match.Hoping that was all just media talk, lyon and hussey are apparently best mates so if the clarke/hussey fallout was true you would hate to think that would have influenced the move to dump lyon.
Yeah i get that feeling as well, i am sure clarke was pissed at hussey for not letting him know sooner but i doubt the stories of a major falling out are true.
