Remove this Banner Ad

The selectors

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Thing is that the selectors can still stick to the basics: six batsmen, one keeper, four bowlers. It works for a reason.
The theory of picking two half-batsmen who are also half-bowlers, because if you add the halves together you get a batsman and a bowler, really isn't working out that well.
It really does lead to something less than the sum of the parts.
 
Whatever they do now, it'll be reshuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic.

Lots of mistakes have been made this tour, and I'm not quite sure how the NSP have managed to be consistently wrong. Even Hilditch got it right occasionally.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

well at least the argument of playing two spinners in the previous test has been put to bed.

can we find our first spinner (which may or may not be lyon long term, but at the moment he's the best we've got) before we try and start playing around with two spinners? much less on this wicket which isn't near as big a turner as the first test.

i don't know why they bothered changing the team from the first test. i would've bought bird in for starc but obviously that couldn't happen. we still would get dusted. we're not good enough to beat this indian team in india, at least not in anything than a major upset. but just making changes for changes sake isn't going to be the way forward.
 
I'm still pissed at Hussey btw.

I reckon his retirement threw out a lot of the plans the selectors had for India and the Ashes.

it definately wasn't good timing that's for sure but sometimes that's the way it goes.
 
it definately wasn't good timing that's for sure but sometimes that's the way it goes.

Greendale's the way it goes...

Nah, I'm holding my right to be shitty at Huss. Any shot we had at the Urn went with him. :(
 
Both Ponting and Hussey would have gone fine in India. Ponting's weakness was clearly against top quality pace bowling, of which india have none.

Oh rly? :hearts:

Ajit-Agarkar-925004687-8217279-1.jpg
 
Both Ponting and Hussey would have gone fine in India. Ponting's weakness was clearly against top quality pace bowling, of which india have none.
Ponting's 14 tests in India yielded just one century and an average of 26.48.

It's extremely doubtful he would have "gone fine".
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm still pissed at Hussey btw.

I reckon his retirement threw out a lot of the plans the selectors had for India and the Ashes.
Sorry, but that's a dumb stance to take. Hussey was 37 when he retired. The fact Australia planned poorly for the possibility of him retiring is not his problem.

Expecting him to hold on for 14 more tests when his heart isn't in it is equally as dumb.
 
Sorry, but that's a dumb stance to take. Hussey was 37 when he retired. The fact Australia planned poorly for the possibility of him retiring is not his problem.

Expecting him to hold on for 14 more tests when his heart isn't in it is equally as dumb.

Everybody expected Hussey to be red-hot keen for the Ashes. I don't think believing that is 'dumb'.
 
Not dumb for believing it and although it definitely hurts the side I don't think you should be pissed at Hussey in the slightest.

Yeah I'm not 'really' pissed at Hussey, love him too much, but I'm annoyed at the timing of his decision (even if it was for family reasons).
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Hoping that was all just media talk, lyon and hussey are apparently best mates so if the clarke/hussey fallout was true you would hate to think that would have influenced the move to dump lyon.
I don't think Clarke was one of the ones who wanted to dump Lyon for this match.
 
Yeah i get that feeling as well, i am sure clarke was pissed at hussey for not letting him know sooner but i doubt the stories of a major falling out are true.

Don't believe everything you read in today PR savvy times...there was definately some bad blood at the end and the dressing room story happened.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom