nobbyiscool
Cancelled
WWE Board
Goosed
Sweet F.A Sikh Volunteers Charity Match
Tasmanian Team
NFL Fantasy Comp Champion
Armchair Endzone Major Comp Champion
- Aug 11, 2006
- 21,110
- 23,514
5-10kph is overtaking. 27 is blatant not giving a s**t.
It's getting to off-topic territory, but it's always been a bugbear of mine that our road rules seem to cater to the lowest common denominator of drivers. It's a rubbish approach to road rules. You look at countries like Germany where they train their lowest common denominator of drivers much better, and so their speed limits are much higher.
I once got a whopping great fine (about $800) for being about 30km/hr over the limit driving from Sydney to Canberra and, to this day, having long since paid the fine and gotten the demerit points back, I still maintain that it was bullshit. If I'm a very good driver - it's one of the things that I'm best at in life - it just seems ridiculous to me that, on a bright clear day, on a perfectly straight bit of road, I'm forced to drive at a speed limit far below what I and my car (and most of our cars) are capable of. (It's even more bullshit for a speed camera to be parked at the "ridge" of a hill where you've been driving down hill and are about to be driving up hill.) You never get caught the first time you speed - so if you get to be a good enough driver that, not only can you safely drive at that speed, but you can either see or pre-empt speed cameras before you're caught, does that not indicate that I, and people like me, are capable of driving faster than our upper limits?
If we trained our drivers much better and, as barbaric as it sounds, if we applied a bit of Darwinism to our road rules, it would give people more skill and confidence as drivers, and it would improve driving standards in the inner city as well as on the freeways.