peternorth
Moderator
- May 6, 2005
- 137,305
- 84,098
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Moderator
- #326
Agreed. Problem is, SEN must think that people still want to listen about AFL. Personally, if I don't hear anything for the next couple of months on AFL I would be fine with that. However, there are probably a lot of people who do want to hear what they have been doing at training, how good they are going, the best shape they have ever been in, etc. Don't ask me how that is interesting to listen to, but it seems to be to a lot of people.
There is plenty to talk about including Cricket, golf, upcoming tennis, Premier League, NFL, NBA. However, most of the presenters don't no that much about those sports and wont spend a whole lot of time on them.
i remember pre internet days, when all we got re: pre season was in the papers, used to get excited about reading a snippet of afl team news. now its practically overload. that being said during the off season we should still have devoted timeslots (1 hr say) to cover all things afl.
sen should give us the minimum afl stuff so as to get our excitement levels up as we draw closer to the nab cup!
did anyone else hear finey last night getting callers to suggest new words to replace the overused word MUPPET? couldnt agree with him anymore.



