Interested to see Melbournes sponsors for next year. AHG looked terrible on their Guernsey
Resource The Sponsorship Contract Thread - Manufacturers, Jumpers, Shorts and Matchballs.
- Thread starter Gibbsy
- Start date
- Tagged users None
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
No it didn't
yes it did, horrible looking logo.
At least it wasn't in a massive box..
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
Hancook had the most classic looking fit with the Dees
Difference of opinion, that's fine. Either way looking forward to seeing what's next
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
Has the contract expired?
The AHG Logo itself is quite poor - three letters of varying sizes in Copperplate gothic lettering and a non-descript geometric shape. Its just really meh.
But the logo on the Melbourne jumper was alright. No silly box around it, just clean on the jumper. It was pretty inoffensive in that regard.
But the logo on the Melbourne jumper was alright. No silly box around it, just clean on the jumper. It was pretty inoffensive in that regard.
Melbourne could be looking very different next year. NB, AHG and Do the NT (shorts sponsor) all expired at the end of 2016. Haven't seen any announcements of extensions as yet.
- Aug 25, 2014
- 7,718
- 11,772
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Chuck the tape on the back again.
Gee, you'd hope NB sign on, best manufacturer in the league, ATM.
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
Mmmmmmmmmm puma
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #64
Cheers, I haven't updated this in a while so I'll get around to it in the next couple of days
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
All good!
What do you think of the theory that clubs are suddenly signing longer than usual contracts with manufacturers because the AFL will buy BLK and push to have every club, thus delaying the inevitable?
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #66
I think the league-wide 'in-house' manufacturer thing is just a baseless rumour that has snowballed because that's what rumours tend to do on this board in the off-season. The AFL own these clubs. They can do what they want at any time: cancel contracts, start new ones, whatever. If they had grand plans for such a a proposal then they wouldn't be allowing clubs to sign such long deals.
If the AFL was buying BLK they wouldn't be allowing clubs like Richmond to get out of their contracts early.
Fizzler
BBTB
- Dec 26, 2013
- 12,770
- 16,361
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- OKC, Coburg, Werribee, Storm, QPR
If the AFL were to buy a manufacturer, they probably wouldn't buy an existing manufacturer.
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
We need one every year though , the Puma are leaving the AFL had been debunked
I've been slowly updating the apparel sponsors as they've been announced but that North one had slipped through the net. If anybody can shed any light on any of the expired sponsors (either a renewal or replacement) please yell out.
North's new shorts sponsor will be Hello Solar.
I'll look out for any articles we release regarding timeframes when we officially announce this.
I'll look out for any articles we release regarding timeframes when we officially announce this.
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #73
Dunno about how much they paid, but this thread has contract lengths
TheLoungeLizard
The world's most handsome man
For front and back sponsors?
Second or third post in the thread.
