I know we are nearly at the end of this ridiculous process, but the brinksmanship from all sides of this is just stupid and divisive. A 27k - 30k stadium in the same/similar spot but without a roof would be 70% of the cost, and have half the bulk of the roofed stadium, reducing the visual impact on the precinct. It would generate more revenue, and be better for cricket. It may even have been supported and agreed to 12 months ago.




