Remove this Banner Ad

Toast The Steves

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Can believe your statement because there was a sudden and total lack of faith shown in him which was sad to see. Hope he continues to build his career at GWS.
There was a sudden and total lack of faith shown in him after it became apparent early in the season that he had already committed to leaving Freo for GWS.
 
Yeah, good post. :thumbsu:

However, I think you need to be fair on some of the details of the 'old days'. For example, ultimately Clement wanted out - now we weren't too good at being an attractive option for him an his sort, and Drum put a few players off side at the time etc., but you need to be fair - it takes two to tango and he was not keen to stay despite what legend might tell you. Basically it was a bit like what GWS have gone through, only without the help of the AFL to make it a bit less damaging. Other clubs, particularly aggressive ones like Collingwood, went hard at players that they thought were disheartened by our shenanigans.

Secondly, we broke the cap more on technicality (injury blow-out in 2001 and late lodgement in 2002 or was it 2003?) - both are not great, but it wasn't based on blatant over payment of an ordinary list. In the scheme of things, the infractions were relatively minor. They've since made it easier to avoid the 'injury related' cap blowouts now too FWIW. However, you're right, this had a knock on effect of the Francis fiasco which is the sort of thing I'm glad is behind us.

Finally, the 'kitchen sink' at some stupid trades - yeah, sure. But you need to be fair here too. I mean the Croad one is a case in point. It bombed out, no doubt. But part of the Connolly revival that you praise, included getting big names and capable players like him in. His heart was never in it, and we never found a way to use him at his best (which ended up being CHB), but at the time it didn't seem like a bomb deal at all - and if Croad have had been the player he ended up being back at the Hawks, it would have been a pretty shrewd move all considered given McPharlin was part of the deal etc.

Now I don't want to defend those things, like you I'm glad those days are behind us, history shows that some of the moves and machinations that our club made went nowhere and some were just plain stupid, but it's often overlooked that these things are only clear in hindsight.

Fair comments PJ. I was not intending to be unfair on any specific details of the dreaded "good old days" but to use a number of things that I recall from those times to illustrate the point that the club is evolving as time goes on from a semi amateur basket case to one of the better run and stronger clubs going around. For people to hate the Steves for their part in that is not something I understand.

That evolution has seen the club become a much more professional organisation under all the CEO's and Presidents since around the time of the appointment of Chris Connolly, change at the club has not just been confined to the time of the Steves as some try to make out. There was change before their time in charge and there will be change again after they leave but things will never go back to how they were.

From what I can see much of the negative reaction towards the Steves involves changing the jumper. From the day that it was announced in 1994 that there was to be a Fremantle team in the AFL it was going to be my team. There was no jumper to sway me to join at that very early stage but if it had been I am sure it would not have helped. My personal opinion is that the harlequin jumper and the anchor winker emblem were not things I identified with easily but in spite of my reservations about them I have been a passionate and loyal member but bought very little merchandise because of those reservations.

To me the most relevant thing about the administration of any organisation is it's ability to do what needs to be done at that point in time to make the organisation function well in it's role and to be solvent. The role of the FFC is to run a professional football club in a national league. I think the Steves have done that in spades during their time in charge.
 
I began to lose faith in Harvey when he matched Grover on Rioli in the only dry 10 minutes of the 1st quarter.

I lost faith in Harvey when Grover went to Betts and Ibbo went to Garlett (and Garlett went outside 50)

Grover playing on lightning quick smalls is like a baboon reading a thesaurus .... it makes little practical sense.

When I fell out of love with Harves
 
Picking up guys like Jack Anthony and Colin Sylvia should remind us all that "the old days" are never far away.

What did we give up for them? First rounders was it? Difference between picking up free agents and gambling away our future for a quick fix.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What did we give up for them? First rounders was it? Difference between picking up free agents and gambling away our future for a quick fix.
Not much of one, but some people are apparently happy to sign up list cloggers. The old "gambling away our future" line is a bit inaccurate as well as it makes it sound like the club's future depends on early draft picks when the reality is that they rarely end up contributing significantly.
 
Fair comments PJ. I was not intending to be unfair on any specific details of the dreaded "good old days" but to use a number of things that I recall from those times to illustrate the point that the club is evolving as time goes on from a semi amateur basket case to one of the better run and stronger clubs going around. For people to hate the Steves for their part in that is not something I understand.

That evolution has seen the club become a much more professional organisation under all the CEO's and Presidents since around the time of the appointment of Chris Connolly, change at the club has not just been confined to the time of the Steves as some try to make out. There was change before their time in charge and there will be change again after they leave but things will never go back to how they were.

From what I can see much of the negative reaction towards the Steves involves changing the jumper. From the day that it was announced in 1994 that there was to be a Fremantle team in the AFL it was going to be my team. There was no jumper to sway me to join at that very early stage but if it had been I am sure it would not have helped. My personal opinion is that the harlequin jumper and the anchor winker emblem were not things I identified with easily but in spite of my reservations about them I have been a passionate and loyal member but bought very little merchandise because of those reservations.

To me the most relevant thing about the administration of any organisation is it's ability to do what needs to be done at that point in time to make the organisation function well in it's role and to be solvent. The role of the FFC is to run a professional football club in a national league. I think the Steves have done that in spades during their time in charge.

Yes, yes. Not having a dig at what you were saying regarding the 'bad old days', just making the point that when looking back, it may seem like a Laural and Hardy move, but it wasn't quite that extreme and there were reasons for some of the things that happened that are easy to see as dumb now but in context were understandable at the time.

Eitherway, the evolution is clear and pleasant to experience. So yes, all good, agree, carry on.
 
So the short answer is never.

Palmer's disposal was worse than Danyle Pearce's, and that's saying something.

Agree on your point about Rhys' disposal, however i'm highly of the opinion that it was very much a confidence thing. It wasn't nearly that bad the year he won the RS award, seemed to slowly deterioate as people started smackin him about it.

In the right environment with the right coach i believe he could have been a very good player. I'd say a better Lachie Neale as he had that elite gut running ability that Lachie will never have.
 
In the right environment with the right coach i believe he could have been a very good player. I'd say a better Lachie Neale as he had that elite gut running ability that Lachie will never have.

Steady on Wiz. While my mother-in-law often says I'm good for nothing, I do have an ability to channel those who unfortunately cannot defend themselves on here. So Lachie wants to ask you how many Ross Glendinning's you (or Rhys for that matter) have won at 21? Plus he's like many of the other lads - gearing up for a big preseason and he's happy to work on his gut running as long as we work on our growing guts.;)
 
Steady on Wiz. While my mother-in-law often says I'm good for nothing, I do have an ability to channel those who unfortunately cannot defend themselves on here. So Lachie wants to ask you how many Ross Glendinning's you (or Rhys for that matter) have won at 21? Plus he's like many of the other lads - gearing up for a big preseason and he's happy to work on his gut running as long as we work on our growing guts.;)

HE IS NOT A BETTER VERSION! Don't get that bit confused mate, i just think he could have been if he was in the right situation with the right coaching.
 
HE IS NOT A BETTER VERSION! Don't get that bit confused mate, i just think he could have been if he was in the right situation with the right coaching.

Not confused and don't disagree regarding Palmer and others for that matter under a better coach.
My point was about Lachie who is a favourite that I believe has lots more to offer and it would not surprise if his engine improves too on what was a breakout 2014 for him.
 
This season Palmer kicked 23 goals (17 games) playing as a run with and defensive half forward. His kicking if reasonable but is prone to absolute clangers (1 or 2 a game) and that is that you remember. He struggled after his ACL and lost confidence with the Barlow incident.

It was a good move for him personally. Im still a fan and hopes he does well.
 
This season Palmer kicked 23 goals (17 games) playing as a run with and defensive half forward. His kicking if reasonable but is prone to absolute clangers (1 or 2 a game) and that is that you remember. He struggled after his ACL and lost confidence with the Barlow incident.

It was a good move for him personally. Im still a fan and hopes he does well.

He played one cracking game that year against Port because we had injuries and he finally got a run in the midfield...... Next week we got a few guys back and he went back to sitting on his flank and on the bench again. A Harvey masterstroke!
 
OCD, that's cute. You'll note that I'm not the one that keeps bringing it up.

Yeah, we're financially better off. Big deal, that's not what clubs are for.

Wow. The whole Monty Burns things went straight over your head, huh?

Your second point: You are extremely naive if you think clubs/companies are not about financial profitability. You may not like it - I may not like it - but it's the truth. No point burying your head in the sand. Sport and business are not mutually exclusive - you need to move past that Reg. Success can be measured on many fronts. Of course - all of us want success on the field - every single supporter. Don't hate the players (the Steves) hate the game, Reg.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

In response to those bashing the Steve's in this thread I would like to respond by stating the following: The fact that the Steve's have pushed 'Purple Passion' has definitely assisted in creating one of the most passionate supporter groups in Australian sport. Ive heard the argument from quite a few on here that we have become a 'Marketing Machine' and lost our sole under Team Steve and that making money is not what football teams should be about. I would argue that actually it is the ability of a football club to inspire and evoke emotion by supporting the team that creates the sole of any sporting club. I don't know how you can watch games like our final against Sydney last year and not see how the passion for our football club had not only grown, but grown massively since both Steve's took control of our club. The passion of our supporters, enjoyment of watching the team play and the noise of the crowd is what makes our club great and gives our club both depth and sole. Where a team trains or the song they sing has very little to do with the passion the vast majority of our supporters have for following Freo.
 
Last edited:
Agree on your point about Rhys' disposal, however i'm highly of the opinion that it was very much a confidence thing. It wasn't nearly that bad the year he won the RS award, seemed to slowly deterioate as people started smackin him about it.

In the right environment with the right coach i believe he could have been a very good player. I'd say a better Lachie Neale as he had that elite gut running ability that Lachie will never have.
Actually, Lachie has literarily worked his backside off since coming to the club. In the last preseason he trained with the elite group of runners for the entire preseason.
 
In response to those bashing the Steve's in this thread I would like to respond by stating the following: The fact that the Steve's have pushed 'Purple Passion' has definitely assisted in creating one of the most passionate supporter groups in Australian sport. Ive heard the argument from quite a few on here that we have become a 'Marketing Machine' and lost our sole under Team Steve and that making money is not what football teams should be about. I would argue that actually it is the ability of a football club to inspire and evoke emotion by supporting the team that creates the sole of any sporting club. I don't know how you can watch games like our final against Sydney last year and not see how the passion for our football club had not only grown, but grown massively since both Steve's took control of our club. The passion of our supporters, enjoyment of watching the team play and the noise of the crowd is what makes our club great and gives our club both depth and sole. Where a team trains or the song they sing has very little to do with the passion the vast majority of our supporters have for following Freo.
What a complete load of nonsense. Fremantle supporters earned the passionate tag well before the Steves. Have you only started supporting the club recently?
 
Wow. The whole Monty Burns things went straight over your head, huh?

Your second point: You are extremely naive if you think clubs/companies are not about financial profitability. You may not like it - I may not like it - but it's the truth. No point burying your head in the sand. Sport and business are not mutually exclusive - you need to move past that Reg. Success can be measured on many fronts. Of course - all of us want success on the field - every single supporter. Don't hate the players (the Steves) hate the game, Reg.
I got the Monty Burns thing. It was the OCD thing I obviously didn't get. On reflection it appears you were referring to yourself, so my apologies. A comma wouldn't have gone astray though.

About the Steves v the game, yeah you may be right, and I do hate the corporatisation of the game. The Steves may be doing a reasonable job, but the arse kissing is OTT.
 
I got the Monty Burns thing. It was the OCD thing I obviously didn't get. On reflection it appears you were referring to yourself, so my apologies. A comma wouldn't have gone astray though.

About the Steves v the game, yeah you may be right, and I do hate the corporatisation of the game. The Steves may be doing a reasonable job, but the arse kissing is OTT.

What arse kissing?
 
What a complete load of nonsense. Fremantle supporters earned the passionate tag well before the Steves. Have you only started supporting the club recently?
Ive been there since 95. I would love to know ow you think there was more passion before team Steve. You only had to watch our final exit this year to see people crying in the crowd to see how much the football team means to the supporters. I cant remember too many supporters doing that when we lost our first final or any game in the era 2000 - 2010. It is in my opinion, stating the bleeding obvious, to say the overall noise of the crowd and supporter engagement in the game had improved dramatically in recent years.

I would also say that the fact our merchandise sales were so high this year is a sign of the overall passion the supporter group has in supporting their team. It is one thing to watch the team on TV, another again to go to the game and cheer their lungs out, and another thing entirely to cheer your lungs out all dressed in purple and supporting your team to the extent that you are visibly upset after a key loss.

Can you please explain, with rational logic, how you think we are worse off under the STeves.

BTW: Danyle Pearce ninth in the B & F. Finishing ahead of Pav, Crowley, Dawson, Duffield, Neale and Gu. Thoughts?
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Another measure of how good the Steve's are - what do you guys think - the retention of Lloyd at the club after Collingwood came sniffing around. Perhaps the retention of Sumich as well - I'm sure there are quite a few factors but perhaps we have a professional culture these days people want to stay. FFC are also still hunting that elusive maiden premiership so maybe people stick around as that is the glaring goal everyone in purple wants to achieve. Point is - It seems important behind the scene's staff are happy with the environment at the club. Could you say the same when Uncle Rick was running the show???

..and in a few years the club will have a state-of-the-art headquarters with all the trimmings. How can you be displeased with that??
 
Ive been there since 95. I would love to know ow you think there was more passion before team Steve. You only had to watch our final exit this year to see people crying in the crowd to see how much the football team means to the supporters. I cant remember too many supporters doing that when we lost our first final or any game in the era 2000 - 2010. It is in my opinion, stating the bleeding obvious, to say the overall noise of the crowd and supporter engagement in the game had improved dramatically in recent years.

I would also say that the fact our merchandise sales were so high this year is a sign of the overall passion the supporter group has in supporting their team. It is one thing to watch the team on TV, another again to go to the game and cheer their lungs out, and another thing entirely to cheer your lungs out all dressed in purple and supporting your team to the extent that you are visibly upset after a key loss.

Can you please explain, with rational logic, how you think we are worse off under the STeves.
If you've been following that long then you'll remember the crowd at our first final. That level of passion hasn't been matched at any game since. Have you noticed the cheer squad much lately? The passion there doesn't seem to be up to earlier standards. Attendance stats show that since Rosich was appointed CEO in 2008, average H&A crowds have never reached the levels they were at in 2007, even though the membership base has risen 12%. We seem to be gathering members who aren't passionate, bandwagoners who turn up and cry at finals and then disappear into the wind during tough times. Spurning the rusted ons in order to chase that particular market isn't my idea of how you ensure long term success.
BTW: Danyle Pearce ninth in the B & F. Finishing ahead of Pav, Crowley, Dawson, Duffield, Neale and Gu. Thoughts?
This isn't the thread for it, but like people have been saying, the Doig has a weird voting system. That doesn't alter the fact that Danyle was the turnover merchant of 2014. Lachie Neale wasn't even in the top 10 and if it came down to a choice, I'd take Lachie over Danyle in a heartbeat.
 
If you've been following that long then you'll remember the crowd at our first final. That level of passion hasn't been matched at any game since. Have you noticed the cheer squad much lately? The passion there doesn't seem to be up to earlier standards. Attendance stats show that since Rosich was appointed CEO in 2008, average H&A crowds have never reached the levels they were at in 2007, even though the membership base has risen 12%. We seem to be gathering members who aren't passionate, bandwagoners who turn up and cry at finals and then disappear into the wind during tough times. Spurning the rusted ons in order to chase that particular market isn't my idea of how you ensure long term success.
This isn't the thread for it, but like people have been saying, the Doig has a weird voting system. That doesn't alter the fact that Danyle was the turnover merchant of 2014. Lachie Neale wasn't even in the top 10 and if it came down to a choice, I'd take Lachie over Danyle in a heartbeat.

I have been to all our home finals, and the most passionate (by far) was the Preliminary Final against Sydney.
The Essendon final was over as a spectacle far too early, and we consoled ourselves with achieving a final berth towards the end of the game. Some said we accepted mediocrity. As I lurched home drunkenly I passed Dennis Cometti walking out of Subiaco Oval. I said something like " next year we'll be better". He grunted. He was right.
if I was to rank our home finals in terms of passion, it would be
Sydney 2013
Hawthorn 2010
Port Adelaide 2014
Essendon 2003
Melbourne 2006. I think...

And the match committee know what they are talking about, and have a longer attention span. I bet Pearce's higher votes came at the beginning of the season.
 
Bob Maumill on PR this morning mentioned he had been harassed by a couple of supporters to bag out the Steves on radio
(Reg was that you).Bob gave three reasons why he could not do that.
1 Competitive on the field big tick
2 Unity in the players and club Big tick
3 Viable of the field, profitable in all facets Big tick
Thats really all you need to say about the Steve's and their running of the club
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom