- May 8, 2007
- 48,686
- 71,373
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Banned
- #2,451
He respected them.I disagreed with his lack of respect of respect for the elderly.
Give the quote in context where he didn't
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He respected them.I disagreed with his lack of respect of respect for the elderly.
I disagreed with his lack of respect for the elderly.
I watched it otherwise how would I know what he said about the elderly, funerals, suicide, hugs etcYou should do yourself a favour and actually watch the video, it will help.
Just going by your comment "He lost me at “its only old people” some of those old people fought for the freedom we now enjoy you ungrateful selfish twerp"I watched it otherwise how would I know what he said about the elderly, funerals, suicide, hugs etc
That's the trouble, it's not about Jake King the man and his past, as people are wanting to take that direction, it's about a bloke called Jake who has had his business close and is unable to visit family, and concerned about the implications not only for him but other family member, friends and Victorians in general
I suppose this is another person Jake would just lock away so he could roam around
I don't do the vacuuming, I have a cleaner for that as for his rant not going to listen to that againI'm convinced you didn't watch kings video, if you did you were probably distracted doing the vacuuming or something.
He was very concerned, very passionate about the elderly, their physical and more so mental health.
Go back to 5.15 to 7.21 and give me your interpretation of his comments.
He was holding back tears.
I don't think he was trying to downplay it that much, more a bad choice of words. He did say it was sad as well. What he was trying to say most likely was that the response is disproportionate , basically everyone suffers because a minority gets effected. Hence we need a better solution to this not just strict lockdowns or let it rip. Though the facts are it is mostly old sick people and the fact of the matter is we shouldn't even be going near them if we are sick with anything in the first placeHe lost me at “its only old people” some of those old people fought for the freedom we now enjoy you ungrateful selfish twerp.
I suppose this is another person Jake would just lock away so he could roam around
Just presenting another side to the lockdown argumentPretty shitty comment mate, grow up
He also prefaced the video by saying he's not the most educated bloke when it comes to education and doesnt have the biggest vocabulary when it comes to words so will "miss pronounce" most of it.I don't think he was trying to downplay it that much, more a bad choice of words. He did say it was sad as well. What he was trying to say most likely was that the response is disproportionate , basically everyone suffers because a minority gets effected. Hence we need a better solution to this not just strict lockdowns or let it rip. Though the facts are it is mostly old sick people and the fact of the matter is we shouldn't even be going near them if we are sick with anything in the first place
Anyone would think i purposely looked for the ugliest picture when all I did was cut and paste it from the article I got his comment from, its not a conspiracyHe also prefaced the video by saying he's not the most educated bloke when it comes to education and doesnt have the biggest vocabulary when it comes to words so will "miss pronounce" most of it.
Jake puts his views out there and the usual hashtag "l stand with Dan" supporters just want to put him down and mock him.
They did similar yesterday with the organiser of the Give Dan the Boot protest. They found a photo of him when he was only 15 and mocked and ridiculed his appearance (His ears in particular) it was appaling, but they thought it was funny.
Luke Darcy interviewed Dan Andrews last week and basically said the same as Jake and was praised the following days by the media, business community, especially hospitality sector. Difference between the two is the delivery, the content was the same.
Did notice he has nearly 7 thousand likes and 2.4k comments for that video, and with the few I scrolled through all possitive.
I suppose this is another person Jake would just lock away so he could roam around
I'm pretty sure she knows what is detrimental to her health, people in her position usually have it explained to them in plain english by the specialists.In her circumstance of having lupus only "one" person needs a mask, that's her.
Two people standing/sitting either side of her, social distancing, one with, one without a mask, both seemingly healthy but could be asymptomatic.
Who is the biggest threat to Mrs Lupus and why?
I'm asking you, because you said in reply to her tweet "Just presenting another side to the lockdown argument"I'm pretty sure she knows what is detrimental to her health, people in her position usually have it explained to them in plain english by the specialists.
What argument? Jake in no way wants these ppl to die. He like many of us wants a better solution other than a wuhan style lockdown, how hard is that to comprehend. Just because we don't agree with this lockdown doesn't mean we want ppl to die. That's what you pro lockdown ppl seem to assume. And it's so stupid .Just presenting another side to the lockdown argument
240k views too. And exactly overall msg is the same. A government with that many resources at their helm should be able t get through this without a wuhan style lockdown for months that cripples almost everyone. That's what ppl have been saying yet for these dan ass lickers it means we want everyone dead.He also prefaced the video by saying he's not the most educated bloke when it comes to education and doesnt have the biggest vocabulary when it comes to words so will "miss pronounce" most of it.
Jake puts his views out there and the usual hashtag "l stand with Dan" supporters just want to put him down and mock him.
They did similar yesterday with the organiser of the Give Dan the Boot protest. They found a photo of him when he was only 15 and mocked and ridiculed his appearance (His ears in particular) it was appaling, but they thought it was funny.
Luke Darcy interviewed Dan Andrews last week and basically said the same as Jake and was praised the following days by the media, business community, especially hospitality sector. Difference between the two is the delivery, the content was the same.
Did notice he has nearly 7 thousand likes and 2.4k comments for that video, and with the few I scrolled through all possitive.
I doubt the lupus lady has ever seen a person in public without a mask concidering Melb are in lockdown and they're mandatory, and she should only be out in an emergency like chemo etc.What argument? Jake in no way wants these ppl to die. He like many of us wants a better solution other than a wuhan style lockdown, how hard is that to comprehend. Just because we don't agree with this lockdown doesn't mean we want ppl to die. That's what you pro lockdown ppl seem to assume. And it's so stupid .