Could also be other clubs know he's coming our way, so why waste the time testing/interviewing him.I assume the inference being that Adelaide wouldn't have put a request in for him to attend to reduce the chance of hitting the 3 club requirement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could also be other clubs know he's coming our way, so why waste the time testing/interviewing him.I assume the inference being that Adelaide wouldn't have put a request in for him to attend to reduce the chance of hitting the 3 club requirement.
AFC already playing games ??
Okay I will.I think this is actually a real positive for crows,.. push him further off clubs radars... Crows should nominate him come draft time,. and with a little luck grab him with 4th-5th rounder... Gold Value.. Mark my words,.. will play 3-5 games for us in 2018.
So they can assess his value and make sure we don't pick him up on the cheap?Could also be other clubs know he's coming our way, so why waste the time testing/interviewing him.
looks lean AF,.. I agree with the comparison to Simon Black,.. should start as an outside mid, but evolve into the Pendlebury/Black Style player,. mixture of both but get alot of outside ball,. not saying of course he will be as good as them guaranteed,. but hey.. dare to dream.Okay I will.
He's going to be fairly undersized if he does get picked up.
The potential draftees to be most interested in are the ones that already have been pursued and signed up by the big management groups, they don't get it wrong very often.Going by the stories of Jake Lever and how the Crows had been in contact for a couple of seasons before the draft I suspect it must be common practise for clubs to contact potential draftees they are interested in fairly often. I would be curious to find out from Tyson or Jackson whether they have been contacted by other clubs testing the waters on whether he is committed to the Crows. I hope he skates through father son bidding cheap.
Under 16 so it will be 2019. also at this time likely to be a KPP or tall mid.Does anyone know what trade luke Edwards will be in? Also I wondered if Connor McLeod is worth us considering. Has anyone seen him play ?
Edwards - pick 45 onwards IMO . Rookie would be best result like Jars
Needs a lot of work
Yes but he needs to reinvent his game or become the next james aish- too slow , lack of speed/power and lack of penetration . He's way too uncontested at moment which he gets away with at least levels with smartsWhat are his areas of development Jeffcrowe? The Crows were very impressed with him when he was training with them. Do you see any AFL qualities in him?
I can't see us taking the rookie risk with Edwards. I think we'll pre-list him, especially as the cost to match won't be much.Edwards - pick 45 onwards IMO . Rookie would be best result like Jars
Needs a lot of work
We only have to match a bidI can't see us taking the rookie risk with Edwards. I think we'll pre-list him, especially as the cost to match won't be much.
Depends on how highly they rate him.We only have to match a bid
Yeah, but if we want to rookie him we have to elect not to match before the draft.We only have to match a bid
Will be interesting, considering what Tyson had to say about the Ben Jarman situation. Could be another piece of drama between the Jarman/Edwards family and the Adelaide Footy Club.Jackson Edwards will get a father-son nomination ... there is no doubt is there? Bicks ?
Will be interesting, considering what Tyson had to say about the Ben Jarman situation. Could be another piece of drama between the Jarman/Edwards family and the Adelaide Footy Club.
I don't think there's any doubt that he'll get a nomination. The only question is whether he's nominated for the ND or RD.Jackson Edwards will get a father-son nomination ... there is no doubt is there? Bicks ?
Ahhh ok - surely ND. He hasn't just forgotten how to play in the last few months has he ??I don't think there's any doubt that he'll get a nomination. The only question is whether he's nominated for the ND or RD.
Look what happened to Scharenberg last year.Ahhh ok - surely ND. He hasn't just forgotten how to play in the last few months has he ??
True.Look what happened to Scharenberg last year.
Yeah, but if we want to rookie him we have to elect not to match before the draft.
For example, with Ben Jarman, if a team in the 2016 AFL draft nominated Ben with pick 76 the Crows would not have had the opportunity to match as they had passed on pre-listing him (presumably since they thought he was only worthy of a rookie spot).
I agree. Assuming the Crows win the flag, if Jackson goes at pick 45 (i.e. middle of the 3rd round) then it would cost the Crows their pick 53 and pick 71 dropping to the end of the draft, so no major loss there.Yeah I realise that
Reckon we will match a late bid ( ie find him draftable in main draft unlike Jars)