Remove this Banner Ad

The Transfers Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter ADL9798
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Think he's referring to moomba's rant about wages, which overlooks City offering to pay RVP about 300k.

What rant?

And I would have overlooked RVP because we never offered to pay him £300k.
 
He's the main man at Villa, he wouldn't be that at City. He would get less game time with us and it would hinder his development.

What he's worth to Villa is certainly more than what he would be worth to us.

The funny thing is, if we did all suggest the club should spend £20m to ride roughshod over Villa and nick their best player to sit on our bench you'd be accusing us of arrogance and delusion.

It's funny how many people get offended by the big money in the game until there's a chance of their club getting a taste of it. Surely as a Villa fan you should be screaming from the rooftop "Benteke is not for sale".
who said I wanted him sold?
just responding to the certainty in your opinions which is unjustified.
your strikers really haven't performed consistently this season and how much he would play would be dependent on the manager, and how he wants to set up his side because he's obviously a different player to the three strikers you have now.
 
Think he's referring to moomba's rant about wages, which overlooks City offering to pay RVP about 300k.
Don't get started on that again
City weren't actually interested. They "pulled out" before that just like with Hazard and probably any other decent player they have been linked with :confused:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Don't get started on that again
City weren't actually interested. They "pulled out" before that just like with Hazard and probably any other decent player they have been linked with :confused:
They couldnt afford him.
U guys made the biggest offer and got him.
 
Don't get started on that again
City weren't actually interested. They "pulled out" before that just like with Hazard and probably any other decent player they have been linked with :confused:

I've never said we weren't interested. Just that we never offered £300k a week.

Signing RVP for £300k would cost us £15m a year on his wages, £20m on his transfer fee, £10m a year matching Tevez and Yaya (and maybe Aguero) with the clubs new highest earner as their contract entitles them.

Every other player or prospective player would use £300k as a base for negotiations instead of the current maximum. It would ultimately cost us close to £100m a season.

Meanwhile we're tightening our belts in preparation for FFP. Re-signing the likes of Silva and Kompany on lower bases (with performance bonuses), passing on Hazard as he was too expensive.

If you want to believe in fairytales you go for it.
 
I've never said we weren't interested. Just that we never offered £300k a week.

Signing RVP for £300k would cost us £15m a year on his wages, £20m on his transfer fee, £10m a year matching Tevez and Yaya (and maybe Aguero) with the clubs new highest earner as their contract entitles them.

Every other player or prospective player would use £300k as a base for negotiations instead of the current maximum. It would ultimately cost us close to £100m a season.

Meanwhile we're tightening our belts in preparation for FFP. Re-signing the likes of Silva and Kompany on lower bases (with performance bonuses), passing on Hazard as he was too expensive.

If you want to believe in fairytales you go for it.

dont bother, we also offered kaka 500k a week. laughable.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Even saf said recently that the only club tha made a serious offer for rvp were juve and manu.

Sort of contradicts what Mancini said then doesn't it.

Although they didn't offer RvP 300k a week City were well and truly after him.
 
Sort of contradicts what Mancini said then doesn't it.

Although they didn't offer RvP 300k a week City were well and truly after him.

It doesn't contradict what Mancini has said.

Mancini was definitely interested.

From what I've heard the reason we didn't go through with a bid was because we dragged our feet selling one of the four forwards we had at the club plus the fringe types (Ade, RSC).

Mancini definitely blames Brian Marwood for a deal not being done.
 
It doesn't contradict what Mancini has said.

Mancini was definitely interested.

From what I've heard the reason we didn't go through with a bid was because we dragged our feet selling one of the four forwards we had at the club plus the fringe types (Ade, RSC).

Mancini definitely blames Brian Marwood for a deal not being done.

I heard that it was because RvP chose United. I think Mancini even said that.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

icardi off to inter in the summer according to gazzetta for 15 mil euros as a milito replacement. us and napoli we're interested. napoli bid 13 mil but it wasnt enough.

in case you don't know, icardi is a 19 year old argie from sampdoria who bought him for a measly 400k last summer. 8 goals in 18 serie a games, and is probably best know for his 2 goals vs juve and 4 goals vs pescara.

funnily enough before sampdoria signed him he was with barcelona.
 
icardi off to inter in the summer according to gazzetta for 15 mil euros as a milito replacement. us and napoli we're interested. napoli bid 13 mil but it wasnt enough.

in case you don't know, icardi is a 19 year old argie from sampdoria who bought him for a measly 400k last summer. 8 goals in 18 serie a games, and is probably best know for his 2 goals vs juve and 4 goals vs pescara.

funnily enough before sampdoria signed him he was with barcelona.
Read an article about him on Soccernet the other week.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom