Remove this Banner Ad

The Transfers Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
no it's not. if you can find one neutral football fan out of every 100 who agrees I'd be very, very surprised.
Well from all the evidence, that front three is better. Huge question marks over Di Maria and Benzema fitting in and excelling in the English game. Whereas we have almost the player of the year in Suarez and Sturridge who has shone since moving to Liverpool with 10 in 15.

As I said thanks but no thanks. If Suarez put in a transfer request and we had to move him on. Great, that deal seems a very good one. But we dont have to sell Suarez so keeping him is obviously the better choice.
 
Thiago Alcântara is likely to join Manchester United after the arrival of Neymar to Barca who will be awarded the No. 11 shirt. However his agent has said that Thiago will decide his future after the U-21 Championships.

why do you always bold your posts in this thread?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Difference between playing great for half a season when the pressure is off and being a great player.

I'd wait and see on Sturridge and Coutinho.

Not overly keen on Benzema, Di Maria is top quality though, it wouldnt surprise if we had a nibble there.
Im still waiting and seeing on Sturridge but Coutinho, well he just oozes class.
 
Supposedly Lyon are interested in Gervinho, could maybe be part of a deal with Grenier?

Why they would want Gervinho is anyone's guess. That would also leave Arsenal another forward down.
 
Supposedly Lyon are interested in Gervinho, could maybe be part of a deal with Grenier?

Why they would want Gervinho is anyone's guess. That would also leave Arsenal another forward down.
Not a huge loss really. With Podolski and Walcott being the wide starters, Gervinho was a (very good) backup. If AOC continues his development, then I can see the impact from the departure of Gervinho being minimal.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Not a huge loss really. With Podolski and Walcott being the wide starters, Gervinho was a (very good) backup. If AOC continues his development, then I can see the impact from the departure of Gervinho being minimal.

There will be no impact at all if gervinho left, irrespective of the ox's continued development or not. Gervais has been one of Wenger's worst signings.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Not a huge loss really. With Podolski and Walcott being the wide starters, Gervinho was a (very good) backup. If AOC continues his development, then I can see the impact from the departure of Gervinho being minimal.

I meant more along the lines of that will leave Arsenal with only 2 recognised forwards in Giroud and Podolski.

Since Podolski plays wide and Walcott cant be trusted to play through the centre, if Giroud is suspended/ Injured for a period, we really have no other options besides our new French youngster.

Bendtner, Chamakh and Park have all been failures. Gervinho has failed but to a lesser exten, I cant see Wenger letting him go and replacing 4 forwards in one off-season.
 
No shit.

From the reports I've read(must admit I haven't seen him play) he's a CM not a AM, which is what we need.

Even if he is, a guy with just 1 cap for Holland (a friendly) isn't being bought to play for you. He's an investment for the future. You'll loan him out and if one day he's good enough for you, you'll have signed him on the cheap. If he won't be good enough for you, you'll have made your money back through loan fees and you'll make a profit on the higher selling price.

Not looking at Chelsea here but this is not good for football. It's good financially for the player, his agent and Chelsea, but in the end what you get is an elite club making even more money and smaller clubs missing out on transfer fees.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top