The Vent Thread

[_RT_]

To posters who whinge about having to play 5-6 rookies on the ground and how it ruins your scores/chances. Shut up about it, becuase it is not the rookies that are ruining it for you, it is more likely the other players that you picked. I had 5-6 rookies running around this weekend and still managed to score 2000 for the 4th time this season.

I have no doubt that I have most of the same rookies as everyone else does i.e. Ziebell, Hill, Beams, Walker, Brown & Otten (if he counts as a rookie) were on the ground plus I have Hartlett, Anthony, Jacobs and Spencer all sitting on the bench. So stop whinging about rookies starting and ruining your chances because its not them.

 

[happy_eagle]

I vent at dream team
I have officially given up now
Will probably just use all trades, to make my side look pretty
And focus on the real football
Eagles 09

 

[bones25]

To posters who whinge about having to play 5-6 rookies on the ground and how it ruins your scores/chances. Shut up about it, becuase it is not the rookies that are ruining it for you, it is more likely the other players that you picked. I had 5-6 rookies running around this weekend and still managed to score 2000 for the 4th time this season.

I have no doubt that I have most of the same rookies as everyone else does i.e. Ziebell, Hill, Beams, Walker, Brown & Otten (if he counts as a rookie) were on the ground plus I have Hartlett, Anthony, Jacobs and Spencer all sitting on the bench. So stop whinging about rookies starting and ruining your chances because its not them.

You bragging all the time is no different from some whinging all the time. But no, you are so clever.

 

[_RT_]

You bragging all the time is no different from some whinging all the time. But no, you are so clever.

I don't consider it bragging. I was merely showing that you can still score well with 5-6 rookies running around.

As I said in my vent, most people will have the same rookies so how can it be the rookies when plenty of people are still managing to score 2000+ despite having a number of these rookies running around as well. I could understand if people had 5-6 rookies and everyone else had guns but the fact is at this stage of the year there isn't that much difference between squads.

 

[beez]

To anyone bragging about how good they are (not looking at anyone (stupid mod))!! No one cares.

 

[Porps_is_HOT_loz]

Thanks to Lockyer, because the week I get him in he fails bad.

Oh and Hille, thanks babe

 

[_RT_]

To anyone bragging about how good they are (not looking at anyone (stupid mod))!! No one cares.

I have a theory that people performing badly are usually the ones that say things like this. Hope I wrong in your case.

 

[gizmo01]

The 0 won't factor in his price change this week. I'm pretty sure if you dont register any kind of score it means your emergency will come in and he will be deemed no different to if he didn't play today at all.

Wrong.

Right.

 

[beez]

I have a theory that people performing badly are usually the ones that say things like this. Hope I wrong in your case.

2106 - You make your own judgement

 

[Decipher]

Lost league by like 50 points.
Thanks Petrenko, Didak, Hille you are all spuds.
Skipworth to Warren and Hille to Cox it seems.

 

[weagles_fan]

To posters who whinge about having to play 5-6 rookies on the ground and how it ruins your scores/chances. Shut up about it, becuase it is not the rookies that are ruining it for you, it is more likely the other players that you picked. I had 5-6 rookies running around this weekend and still managed to score 2000 for the 4th time this season.

I have no doubt that I have most of the same rookies as everyone else does i.e. Ziebell, Hill, Beams, Walker, Brown & Otten (if he counts as a rookie) were on the ground plus I have Hartlett, Anthony, Jacobs and Spencer all sitting on the bench. So stop whinging about rookies starting and ruining your chances because its not them.

I see there is no mention of the worst scorer of them all this round - Petrenko who scored ****ing 12!!! Yes less than half what any of them scored so shut the **** up.

 

[bones25]

I don't consider it bragging. I was merely showing that you can still score well with 5-6 rookies running around.

As I said in my vent, most people will have the same rookies so how can it be the rookies when plenty of people are still managing to score 2000+ despite having a number of these rookies running around as well. I could understand if people had 5-6 rookies and everyone else had guns but the fact is at this stage of the year there isn't that much difference between squads.

You are basically telling people that they chose poorly by having the likes of Pav, Franklin, Deledio, Hodge, Harvey, Hille, Simmonds, Mackie etc etc, they are all Premiums, they have all started poorly this year, and because you don't have them then everyone chose poorly.

Today Harvey 0, Hille 0, Petrenko a shitty 12, yes people are entitled to be pissed off and have a whinge, but you decided to post the same noserub in 2 threads.

Btw why haven't you got Rich? Oh sorry must be another poor choice from 110,000 people.

 

[triplejdude]

God ****ing dammit! After this whole time spent averaging 2050, I scored 1940 this week and lost by 16 points to the biggest ******** in our league. When I needed 50 odd from Petrenko and Taylor Walker, I thought I should have done it easy. But no petrenko decides to score ****ing 12 and Walker does sweet **** all. Aarggghhh

/rant

 

[Tippaz]

Ziebell !!!

 

[crazyman27]

Can't believe emergencies scores counted for Harvey.

I had Walker and Brown already starting in the forward line (covering Skippy and NGB) and then Didak is a late-withdrawal so I have a donut.

Harvey plays, scores nothing and scoring emergencies come in.

What a joke, and to add to the pain, Harvey and Hille's prices don't change.

 

[chadleverington]

God ****ing dammit! After this whole time spent averaging 2050, I scored 1940 this week and lost by 16 points to the biggest ******** in our league. When I needed 50 odd from Petrenko and Taylor Walker, I thought I should have done it easy. But no petrenko decides to score ****ing 12 and Walker does sweet **** all. Aarggghhh

/rant

Ahh, relying on rookies to get you over the line, yeah been there before.

 

[_RT_]

I see there is no mention of the worst scorer of them all this round - Petrenko who scored ****ing 12!!! Yes less than half what any of them scored so shut the **** up.

My complete list of rookies: Hill, Petrenko, Hartlett(traded in this week for Robinson), Beams, Otten, Anthony(yet to even play), Jacobs, Spencer, Ziebell, Brown & Walker. 11 of my squad are rookies. So I think that allows me to whinge about those having to start so many rookies and scoring shit.

You are basically telling people that they chose poorly by having the likes of Pav, Franklin, Deledio, Hodge, Harvey, Hille, Simmonds, Mackie etc etc, they are all Premiums, they have all started poorly this year, and because you don't have them then everyone chose poorly.

Today Harvey 0, Hille 0, Petrenko a shitty 12, yes people are entitled to be pissed off and have a whinge, but you decided to post the same noserub in 2 threads.

Btw why haven't you got Rich? Oh sorry must be another poor choice from 110,000 people.

Its called doing research. As I said everyone has the same bunch of rookies but in different combos. Why is it that there are plenty of sides out there with the same rookies that are scoring 2000+? If everyone has the same group of rookies then surely it has to be the difference between their premiums and midrangers which is exactly why I made the vent that I did.

 

[William C]

Fantastic week for me.

- Injuries to Dalziell and Harvey this week, both out for 3 months

- Injuries already on the pine: Raines, Anthony, NG Brown, Skipworth, Jacobs, Hentschel

- Traded out Ottens last weeK. Note to self: Geelong medical staff - piss weak.

- Special mention to my favourite scorers this week: Petrenko (12), Richo (26), Gilbee (53), Kerr (36)

I could go on forever, but I'll stop now ...

 

[writeoff]

Injuries are killing what was a pretty ordinary squad to start with.

So far I've had Anthony, Raines, Ottens, Hocking, N G Brown, Jacobs (who I had playing for Ottens), Skipworth, Hille, Harvey and now Dalziell. 3 of my initial rucks. Plus Callan from WBD who is still yet to play.

5 of those are premiums (Ottens, N G Brown, Hille, Harvey & Dalziell) and have lost alot of $.

Last year I finished just out of the top 100. This year I will be lucky to finish in the top 30,000.

 

[brent-83]

The ****ing Dalziell experiment was officially a ****ing failure and disaster. **** YOU DALZIELL + HARVEY.

 

[Alfonz]

I had a superb week, nothing to complain about:
- Dalziell
- Harvey
- Hille
- Richo (Capt)

 

[mortizy]

it is really annoying atm in the eliminator, because my team should smash his, but atm the at quarter time he has

presti on 20
maxwell on 25
zeibell 22
davis on 26,

i have swan 17, ziebell22, hmac 43, beams 10, hes beating me atm!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[mortizy]

in fact my bad presti is on 24, on track for 96???????? hmmmm hes beating swan not good i hate dt

 

[slidetribe]

it is really annoying atm in the eliminator, because my team should smash his, but atm the at quarter time he has

presti on 20
maxwell on 25
zeibell 22
davis on 26,

i have swan 17, ziebell22, hmac 43, beams 10, hes beating me atm!!!!!!!!!!!

Duuuuude it's 3.125% into the round...

 

[mortizy]

^^^its the vent thread u have to be angry and be more dramatic, its ok though u will learn