Gaffanator
All Australian
If it's so popular why haven't they released new stock with the BW logo?
Who knows but I doubt it's going anywhere. The Eagles love their cash, even if it's a detriment to the fans.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If it's so popular why haven't they released new stock with the BW logo?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I know the sponsors are wrong but I couldn't be bothered changing and swapping them.
How long did you take to type that?!![]()
@cammania.
Lightweight jumpers have been tried and tested before. I know Adidas had them. I remember checking out a Crows "bib" design, and the material was thinner, with a pattern not unlike Nike's 'NikeFit' soccer material. I'm guessing they might still have it. Blades use them as well. However, most people don't like them. Unaffectionately titled "toilet paper jumpers", they're certainly odd looking. I'm certain it would make little difference. This because of the tightness of footy strips these days. The reason thinner material works in the NBA and soccer is because garments are baggier. Even if they're fitted and tailored (ala Umbro's recent soccer range), there's still a gap between skin and shirt. That isn't there in football. Without that space, you can't wick away sweat.
I do like your idea about introducing two types of consumer jumpers. The regular, polyester material could retail for what it is now. Yet a jumper with side panels, non-cotton cuffs, and some watermarks could retail for $170. I dunno.
re: cammania's post
best idea is the number above the AFL logo. people complained (on this board) about the 'cluttered' 'billboard' look of collingwood's, specifically this
![]()
but AFL uniforms look fine, even if Port Adelaide for example had numbers above the AFL logo, the club and sponsor logos on the other side I wouldn't complain about it 'cluttering the V design' or anything, not just because our uniforms are among the cleanest in pro sport but it doesn't look bad anyway.
the post is full of Eagles wank though. I don't care about the number on the neck but the watermarks thing is just silly and isn't intimidating in the slightest. and then what is the last point, u want the club song on the jumper.....? i don't even know if i understood that properly