Those graphs were both mathematically dubious (check out the creative usage of Y-axes) and applied in a rather slippery fashion.
The overall point being that he did not take over the competitive side he thinks McCartney did, and we must WAIT for the remainder of the year to pan out before even beginning to draw conclusions on particular directions the club may be heading in. Even then, it's not a linear thing.
I mean, comments like "If you hadn't noticed McCartney has only won 8 games in just over a season and a half. We won 9 in 2010, immediately before he took over, which was Eade's worst season result with the dogs" are completely ridiculous.

