Chipmunk
100% pacifist, British
- Feb 14, 2020
- 25,178
- 54,725
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Other Teams
- Gillingham, Las Vegas Bears
It’s Day 2 isn’t it haha
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What’s your issue? I’m literally agreeing with you?
Yeah I know, I was clearly joking. You need to work on your sense of humour.Typed post:
That wasn't talk to text you peanut.
Do we need to get rid of Wiggy now that the wolves would likely try to control 2 votes now they know where they are? Yes they may have known already and may already be using it but its possibly worth it?Day 3 felt like pushing my luck without a claim tbh. Anyway, people can use me as they wish.
use of jack SYeah I know, I was clearly joking. You need to work on your sense of humour.
Do we need to get rid of Wiggy now that the wolves would likely try to control 2 votes now they know where they are? Yes they may have known already and may already be using it but its possibly worth it?
That would make the most sense and explain her posts.Unlikely but another possibility is that MWPP is intimidated to say that Ding seers as evil/neutral. Would not be in keeping with yesterday’s intimidation and with MWPP’s seer result supposedly being shared also to the flogs the downside to the village is mitigated but it’s a possibility.
I’m inclined in this situation to go EJW now. Our seer can verify Dingster tonight, and the wolves controlling an additional two votes outside their own by manipulating Chipmunk’s vote in future phases is a genuine risk as crowy has stated. With an evil doctor that can offer protection overnight to Wig I think situationally our array of actions are best suited to gathering the required intel to eliminate Ding tomorrow and having relative comfort in our control over that vote.
MC Bad Genius
Vote me and I'll be on zero votes aka I'm pie 4 life immune
It’s a convoluted intimidation so I’m not sure it does make the most sense. The most sense is she seered who she said she seered and got the result she said she did given the flogs should be able to corroborate or object to her posting should the need arise.That would make the most sense and explain her posts.
But her vote of Pie, is that indicating who she really seered and the result? Maybe someone should check him out.
Isn’t now the time you tell us who the wolves missed on so you can last another day/night?Logged on to catch up. Air taken out of my sails, that's for sure.
Well, at least my instincts for a stinky post (hi IMS) haven't disappeared in my absence.
say that you've been intimidatedIsn’t now the time you tell us who the wolves missed on so you can last another day/night?
There's always the possibility they hit a good role that was protected.Isn’t now the time you tell us who the wolves missed on so you can last another day/night?
Personally and this is just my view might not be the same for others.Typed post:
EJW the safe vote given the uncertainty over whether Dingster or P4L were actually the target of MWPP's night action, though if the flogs feel it's important to clarify they can jump in at any time.
MC Bad Genius
To be fair if it were GUH or Pie I’d appreciate the clarificationPersonally and this is just my view might not be the same for others.
We can work out which posts are typed and which ones are voiced.
That's all I need to add to this