Revisionism The Young Earth Theory

[Santoz]

What's the news?

She's not as virginal as she tells you.

 

[Exe Gesis]

She's not as virginal as she tells you.

Is that all you've got? I know that already from the apocryphal books.

 

[NEGAN]

If you really believe in this the moons gravitational pull is would be the best evidence I have seen.

 

[chelseacarlton]

how could you not?

“These independent accounts prove that in ancient times even the opponents of Christianity never doubted the historicity of Jesus, which was disputed for the first time and on inadequate grounds by several authors at the end of the 18th, during the 19th, and at the beginning of the 20th centuries” (“Jesus Christ,” Encyclopedia Britannica, 1974).

 

[Cutty]

You are welcome.

 

[darth_timon]

Young earth theory is as much a pseudo-scientific sham as flat earth theory. Relies on wilful ignorance.

 

[Wedge McManus]

No,you are a troll because you don't like religion. I'm not fussed with religion we we cannot,as humans,prove our earth is any age. Our earth could be a day old. We can't prove it isn't.

time for a few people here to get off the internet and get some exercise and fresh air. This paranoid stuff isn't doing you any good

 

[Better Loosen Up]

So how do they explain our carbon dating capabilities these days?

 

[chelseacarlton]

Science is bad, goes to doctor for medication.
Science is bad, logs on to bigfooty to say science is bad.
Science is bad, goes to church to pray that the medicine the doctor gave him is the work of god and prays that the bad science trolls on bigfooty come to reason that his reason is reason enough.
Science is bad.

 

[Wallaby]

So how do they explain our carbon dating capabilities these days?

Pretty well.

Start here - https://science.howstuffworks.com/environmental/earth/geology/carbon-14.htm

If you want to know more details - try here - http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Nuclear/cardat.html

If you want still more - apply to do a Masters in Chemistry and/or Nuclear Radiology.

 

[Pessimistic]

So how did they measure time 6000 years ago?

Surely not by observing the relative movement of things not invented yet

 

[Pessimistic]

As for the various creationism by another name crews, you guys realise you lost out to science by merely arguing in scientific terms? Should have stuck with ‘moves in mysterious ways’.

 

[Mofra]

So how do they explain our carbon dating capabilities these days?

The 'prankster God' theory, proven because he left around fossils on a planet that is clearly only 6,000 years old. Read your bible.

 

[Pessimistic]

Require your arguing opponents to account for,and source for, every single word they utter.

When required to do the same, select from Mysterious ways/Have faith/We are too puny to understand etc etc....get 'Creative'

not limited to creationists, see the Shakespeare authorship conspiracy

 

[Wedge McManus]

All these people who think the earth is round are kidding themselves. Think about it,forget you brainwashing,it makes no sense at all.
We actually know what a ball is,and people think we are living on one hurtling through space.

This is trolling mods. He's been doing it for years. Please do something about it. Opinions are fine even if we don't agree with them but aggressive trolling is against BF rules

 

[darth_timon]

This is trolling mods. He's been doing it for years. Please do something about it. Opinions are fine even if we don't agree with them but aggressive trolling is against BF rules

Oh I don't doubt he's trolling by this point. Flat earth theory is something he likes to pretend is science, but it's clear he makes no effort to present the idea in scientific terms, because it can't be presented in scientific terms. Same for young earth theory.

Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk