Don’t blame you or any individual but blaming the show seems a stretch too.
I live with a friend who works in Youth intervention and she had to watch this show to keep up with the current zietgiest so she could be able to point out the flaws to her kids and how to properly approach depression and deal with these emotions. I think the opposition to the show really has more to do with the fact that it is aimed at at risk teens and whilst it does attempt to dissuade self-harm it does so very poorly to the point where it pretty much glorifies emotional blackmail by revenge-suicide. I remember when I was a teen and all the opposition to Emo music (which at least was publicly derided for doing the same thing) and would give a myopic, depressed teen who is looking for the easiest way to understand negative emotions a REALLY bad way to cope by giving them what is basically a poor fantasy narrative ("they'll be sorry when I'm gone, I bet they will").
In the end I feel in days past where parents had a bit more control over entertainment consumption via a remote in the loungeroom it would be more justifiable to forgive the show and switch the burden of responsibility to the parents. But in todays age of ease of access via streaming sites it's far easier for a teen to view these things because everyone else loves it and it is what is being talked about (and lord knows the two things guaranteed to get a teen to do something are peer pressure and being told not to by an authority figure). So the burden of responsibility has to shift with it from being solely individual and parent based to the content creators themselves I feel (again that is open to fair debate as I base my opinion there coming from a Public Health background)
So in summary: Yes I absolutely would blame the show. But whether or not complete censorship is a fair and just consequence/completely necessary is an argument of nuance between where that duty of responsibility for content consumption currently lies and whether or not it is fair to restrict the ability of the content creator to create revenue on the back of that. And that is just not a conversation you could really have here because too many people just refuse to approach complicated issues such as these because it is easier and more cathartic to reach a set in stone opinion based on a moral ideology (see the libertarian argument here trying to shift total responsibility to the individual).
My two cents, pardon the wall of text as I very seldomly post of BigFooty these days, let alone on General Discussion.