Thoughts on Australia as a nuclear power?

Remove this Banner Ad

Festerz

Club Legend
May 20, 2019
1,666
6,118
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
PAFC Maggies SANFL
Excellent work from Senator Patrick. With the Labor Party wedged into supporting the Coalition Government on the nuclear subs issue and AUKUS, it seems he is the only politician prepared to ask the obvious questions on what will be the largest single defence expenditure in Australian history.

Defence bureaucrats have a long history of thinking they can avoid public scrutiny because of 'national security' BS. These are not state intelligence secrets that they are being asked to reveal at Estimates Committee hearings. Just general level questions aimed at getting to the bottom of revealing what (and if) some level of basic due diligence was made prior to the PM making a political public announcement on this huge shift in our defence policy.

Little wonder every single major defence spend in recent years has been an absolute cock up financially and strategically and this already has the smell of being the worst ever. They, just like any other public servant, have to understand they have accountability to the public for their decisions.

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Hawk Dork

Hall of Famer
Feb 9, 2005
47,329
42,427
on the road to nowhere
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Hawks
“If the U.S. is allowing Australia to have access to its nuclear technology,” he added, “it’s because the U.S. expects Australia to be deploying its forces in a potential war with China.”

For now, the Australian government appears to view even that risk as worth taking on. James Curran, a historian of Australian foreign relations at the University of Sydney, called the decision to double down on the United States “the biggest strategic gamble in Australian history.”

“Australia is betting its house,” he said, “on the U.S. maintaining its resolve and will.”

 

Power Raid

TheBrownDog
Oct 15, 2004
73,137
63,786
West Perth
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
“If the U.S. is allowing Australia to have access to its nuclear technology,” he added, “it’s because the U.S. expects Australia to be deploying its forces in a potential war with China.”

For now, the Australian government appears to view even that risk as worth taking on. James Curran, a historian of Australian foreign relations at the University of Sydney, called the decision to double down on the United States “the biggest strategic gamble in Australian history.”

“Australia is betting its house,” he said, “on the U.S. maintaining its resolve and will.”

perhaps the US will be using Australia's nuclear technology, which is more than likely
 

Festerz

Club Legend
May 20, 2019
1,666
6,118
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
PAFC Maggies SANFL
From who? NZ?
err take a look at the map and have a think.

Maybe from the Indonesians whose territorial waters these nuclear powered boats will have to cross if they are to play a role in the US end game of stopping China's navy from getting their nuclear armed vessels out of the South China Sea and into the station in the Pacific to pose a credible threat to the US.

Which is the only reason why Australia should want to become the only non nuclear-armed nation in the world to want to have nuclear powered subs based in their home ports with long range stealth capabilities.
 
Last edited:

Hawk Dork

Hall of Famer
Feb 9, 2005
47,329
42,427
on the road to nowhere
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Hawks
I was trying to find an article from the NYT yesterday
Basically we have no expertise or enough iodine tablets for every resident of Adelaide in case of a leak
Found it



“Waiting for the next-generation U.K. or U.S. attack submarine would mean an extended capability gap” for Australia, Mr. Taylor wrote in an assessment.

The challenge does not stop with building the submarines. Safeguards to protect sailors and populations, and meet nonproliferation obligations, will require a big buildup of Australia’s nuclear safety expertise.

Residents in some parts of Barrow-in-Furness, the town of 67,000 that is home to Britain’s submarine-building shipyard, are handed iodine tablets as a precaution against possible leaks when reactors are tested.
The Osborne shipyard in South Australia, where Mr. Morrison wants to build the nuclear submarines, sits on the edge of Adelaide, a city of 1.4 million.


Australia operates one small nuclear reactor.
Its sole university program dedicated to nuclear engineering produces about five graduates every year, said Edward Obbard, the leader of the program at the University of New South Wales in Sydney.
Australia would need many thousands more people with nuclear training and experience if it wants the submarines, he said.

“The ramp-up has to start now,” he said.
 

Festerz

Club Legend
May 20, 2019
1,666
6,118
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
PAFC Maggies SANFL
I was trying to find an article from the NYT yesterday
Basically we have no expertise or enough iodine tablets for every resident of Adelaide in case of a leak
These nuclear powered subs will not even start to be built in the next 10 years, if at all, and their power plants will not be fitted or maintained in Adelaide even if they actually do get built.

AUKUS is a short-medium term defence strategy aimed directly at curtailing China aggression over the next 2- 20 years. Seems pretty obvious that it is not dependent on the building of new subs for Australia that won't hit the water until at least 2045 but rather providing base(s) for US (and possibly UK) nuclear powered (and armed) submarines and vessels in Australia.

This is the critical part of the AUKUS announcement that has not even been discussed with the Australian people.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad