Preview Tigers vs Kangas 7:40pm Saturday @ Metricon

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

I've been thinking about a strategy that could help counter this "flood back against Richmond" tactic.


- Given we often like to kick it in long without really hitting up a forward 50 target (and likely cannot anyway due to the sheer numbers in our forward 50), when teams start the flood, you could park one tall forward fairly deep with two of the smaller players nearby. Park the other tall forward 5 to 15 metres in front of him, with the other two smaller players nearby.

- Back the talls to take a mark or at least get it to ground, then the smalls go to work. If the kick comes in deep enough, it goes to the deepest tall and his two smalls, with the higher tall and smalls to then look at pressuring exit options rather than the area with the ball. And then vice-versa, if the kick comes in less deep, to the higher tall and his smalls, the deeper set can then come up to provide assistance at the contest, or pressure exit options that are waiting out the back near the goals.

- While doing this, develop language where the tall can signal to his smalls that he isn't going to make it to the drop of the ball (eg. he is being man-handled and cannot get there). Then one of the smalls can attempt a speccy or something, anything, just to engage the spare defender who is about to take an easy intercept mark, and help the ball get to ground.

- Meanwhile, with the above tactic, our defenders will have set up to lock it into our 50, if indeed the ball comes out. Having employed the flood, you would think the opponent will have fewer players for our defenders to worry about as the ball comes out.

- Once the flood stops (eg. the opponent runs out of gas and cannot sustain the constant pushing back to mass-defend), revert back to a normal Richmond style.

- Further to this, we could start running it into 50 more and taking shots on goal. You have players like Dusty, Caddy, Short for example, who are all capable goal kickers from 50 metres or more. A miss is still better than an easy defensive mark from a long bomb into the 50. A shot at goal is better than a risky pass to half-forward where a turnover basically kills you. And best of all, a goal on the run from 40-60 looks good, and is a massive morale boost to the team; morale-sapping for the opponent.


- Lastly, I've noticed this season, after a behind, we're allowing teams to run it out of the goal square and kick it outside of 50. In the past we've locked them in and forced them to go short from the goal square to the pocket. Any reason we're allowing such an easy long exit after a behind you reckon??
I have no idea why they are. It's so much easier for the opposition defenders to take the ball out. My guess is that the work rate of our smalls has markedly reduced. They don't provide the pressure they used to given that we average 5 tackles per game. We used to like turning the ball over at the edge of the 50. Nowadays the opposition clears our defence much easier
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top