Tim62
Rookie
If you're contemplating going to court over a blog, wouldn't you at least report the post first?
How do you know the defamation hasn't been reported?
You might need to communicate with other admins on here
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If you're contemplating going to court over a blog, wouldn't you at least report the post first?
Because the post hasn't been reported, and it hasn't been removed.How do you know the defamation hasn't been reported?
You might need to communicate with other admins on here![]()
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Because the post hasn't been reported, and it hasn't been removed.
That doesn’t seem to be the correct process though. So why not do things quickly to get the outcome you want?it might have been in a direct convo with another admin![]()
So now this direct convo that might have taken place, has obviously been ignored, as the post is still there, and you've done what about it?it might have been in a direct convo with another admin![]()
#deludedpearlerThe Rampe thing is interesting. Without Rampe the swans had no creativity. We proved we have far more cover in this area. Once we build midfield grunt tho the swans level, well be a far superior team.
Much has been made of the loss of our 'leaders' but they 'led' us to being a threepeat team. Its likely our next group wont be as strong, so just a single premiership team then?
We don't need to rise to quite those levels to be successful again (though theres no harm trying)
Hawks. Biggest Wildcard going into 2018
#deludedpearler
If you're contemplating going to court over a blog, wouldn't you at least report the post first?
He's correct about the right to sue for defamation.
But maybe not his spelling of plagiarism ...
yep, that's not the best way...I saw your private message for the first time 4 minutes ago.
You hit the report button, and the reason you want it removed, and then all mods can see it and deal with it.
The Rampe thing is interesting. Without Rampe the swans had no creativity. We proved we have far more cover in this area. Once we build midfield grunt tho the swans level, well be a far superior team.
Much has been made of the loss of our 'leaders' but they 'led' us to being a threepeat team. Its likely our next group wont be as strong, so just a single premiership team then?
We don't need to rise to quite those levels to be successful again (though theres no harm trying)
Hawks. Biggest Wildcard going into 2018
Nah - just a reference to dumb Bomber posters who lurk and post in their Deluded Pearlers thread. They have already posted something about us saying we are a wildcard thereLink not working. Is it a ref to your signature?
That doesn’t seem to be the correct process though. So why not do things quickly to get the outcome you want?
And, with respect, whining about it for a week and letting it stay there doesn’t exactly indicate that you’re mitigating against any risk of reputational damage
![]()
Nah - just a reference to dumb Bomber posters who lurk and post in their Deluded Pearlers thread. They have already posted something about us saying we are a wildcard there
I’m upbeat about this year too Pess and I love Glass
Totally - I actually agree. But then implying the mods have some sort of responsibility to remove it when you have been happy with your alternate way of dealing with it, drawing attention to it and getting backing from others, is a bit naff.I agree with your previous point that this has become tiresome. This will be my last post on it.
Firstly, retribution/revenge is a dish best served cold
Secondly, why would I want it removed? When by it remaining it paints the lad making the foolish claims in a very dim light. as well as having the support of others who have also seen it if I do pursue litigationScreen shoots with names works really well
Lastly, O'Rourke to rise this year![]()
SLB shouldn’t have written what he did, but he did! He is also a great poster!I agree with your previous point that this has become tiresome. This will be my last post on it.
Firstly, retribution/revenge is a dish best served cold
Secondly, why would I want it removed? When by it remaining it paints the lad making the foolish claims in a very dim light. as well as having the support of others who have also seen it if I do pursue litigationScreen shoots with names works really well
Lastly, O'Rourke to rise this year![]()
This is somewhat trueimplying the mods have some sort of responsibility to remove it when you have been happy with your alternate way of dealing with it, drawing attention to it and getting backing from others, is a bit naff.
We have terrific Mods
If we said otherwise you’d sue usThis is somewhat true
This is even more true...
I agree with your previous point that this has become tiresome. This will be my last post on it.
Firstly, retribution/revenge is a dish best served cold
Secondly, why would I want it removed? When by it remaining it paints the lad making the foolish claims in a very dim light. as well as having the support of others who have also seen it if I do pursue litigationScreen shoots with names works really well
![]()
You’re just playing it safe Tige. We’re risking lawsuitsBrilliant viewing... I like Tim