English pleasei suggest you have yourself the time in asking, and keep your wonderful advice to yourself
it took a whole 0.1 s to respond to an immature question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
English pleasei suggest you have yourself the time in asking, and keep your wonderful advice to yourself
it took a whole 0.1 s to respond to an immature question
If gaff leaves it wont be for money it will be to go home.My gut feel is Gaff will leave but McGovern & Lycett will be the players that stay
Thats 100% Correct , But the Club he chooses would be still throwing good money at him to leave without having to tradeIf gaff leaves it wont be for money it will be to go home.
I honestly think WC will move heaven and earth to match Gaff's offers.
I have a feeling he'll end up at a Melbourne club but it will involve Kelly.
Something like;
WC give Gaff and get Kelly plus picks
Geel give Kelly and get picks
3rd party club gives picks and gets Gaff
We can't accept a pick in the mid/late teens as compensation. Should he leave, that is.I honestly think WC will move heaven and earth to match Gaff's offers.
Lots of talk about him being desperate to return to WA. Pick 24 last year, what's he worth now.
Darcy from Freo would be a shout. Darcy would need a few games this year to just demonstrate his worth again but came into the scene with a bang last year as a first year ruckman.
I know you won’t agree but I’d argue the steak knives would need to come from Geelongs side purely based on Darcy being younger and in the position of ruckman.
Darcy contracted to 2020 where as Kelly contracted to 2019.
But if I was Geelong I’d target Gaff and Lycett through free agency which gives Eagles a pick and seek that back for Kelly.
Haha, wow. Pretty sure they could pick up a ruckman who can't get a game for less than Tim Kelly and some extras.
Haha, wow. Pretty sure they could pick up a ruckman who can't get a game for less than Tim Kelly and some extras.
I like Darcy but his not a established player so we would want a pick as well. Maybe a late 2nd roundDarcy from Freo would be a shout. Darcy would need a few games this year to just demonstrate his worth again but came into the scene with a bang last year as a first year ruckman.
I know you won’t agree but I’d argue the steak knives would need to come from Geelongs side purely based on Darcy being younger and in the position of ruckman.
Darcy contracted to 2020 where as Kelly contracted to 2019.
But if I was Geelong I’d target Gaff and Lycett through free agency which gives Eagles a pick and seek that back for Kelly.
I like Darcy but his not a established player so we would want a pick as well. Maybe a late 2nd round
I was thinking before I saw this that Cats should chase Lycett should Kelly want to go west. This sounds like a decent deal.Cats take Lycett on good deal. We don’t match in return. We get pick around 20.
We give 20 for Kelly.
So Lycett and 20 for Kelly.
Even worse deal for the catsLycett and 20 for Kelly. Would be a s**t deal for West Coast
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Lycett and 20 for Kelly. Would be a s**t deal for West Coast
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Both clubs could trade future picks as well? I admit about couple of months ago I thought he will stay but now I think he will leave. Look I think we should ask him now, do you want to leave. If it is a yes let's organise a deal now, if his not really sure then let's talk in 12 months time. But I hope he stays at Geelong as he is easily in our best 10 players. And his value to Geelong is greatly high.Upgrades one way or the other depending on who can drive the bargain the hardest but both clubs don’t have 2nd rounders so future exchanges probably required.
Just a question? So you saying Geelong get Lycett with a free trade. You get a compo pick for it ( so you say get pick 20 from it) and you give us pick 20 for Kelly?Depends. If the best we could get for Lycett otherwise was band 3 compo, that’s a pick in the mid 30s rather than pick 20. We might match that but we wouldn’t get a huge improvement on the return via trade.
I’d rather (in this theoretical example where the cats are over-paying Lycett so that we won’t match it) to get pick 20 and then swap if for Kelly.