- Sep 9, 2003
- 27,578
- 28,760
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- FGR
Lol at "Freo are ripe".
Ripe to smash us over there, maybe.
Ripe to smash us over there, maybe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed once again. Nice to see the players that have stepped up, for instance Wright, but there's a lot that need to join him. Still I would've taken 50/50 at this point, so hopefully the skill level & decision making can improve.
Agree with all of this.My glass is less full than in previous years, due in part to rising expectations and the age and experience profile of the team. I have 'lost all hope' of us being genuine contender - that is, I don't subscribe to the 'make top four and anything is possible' idea, but I do hate the polarising that goes on which puts you in one camp or the other. It's irritating.
I expected to see the belief gained from last years finals experience and another year of maturity translate into more consistency and a greater capacity to perform in high pressure situations which hasn't turned out to be the case. I'm now doubtful it will with this group, or with this coach and I've got a long record of supporting Brad and being a "glass half full" guy. I don't see the steel and/or mongrel needed. edit: or leadership.
Yes, you'll take winning ugly. Yes, there is potentially more upside to the team when injured players get back and when we find our groove. Yes, the finals are a different scenario, but I don't fancy taking on the likes of Freo or Sydney or Port away in a final. The only serious Melbourne contender are the Hawks and unless we're at home, I fear any finals campaign will be fruitless other than to say we made finals and perhaps won one (or two if we're lucky).
I'm also not enjoying the way we're playing, regardless of ladder and prospects. It's not just ugly it's unskilled and dumb.
50/50 is not good given the circumstances though, if we had beaten the teams we had lost to then the Crows would be a team travelling at 3-3 while Hawks and Port would be travelling at 2-4. We have missed a golden opportunity to be well entrenched in the top 2, like Fremantle, and set ourselves up for a home final and double chance.
But no, we are 3-3 cruising in 9th position in the Brad Scott mediocre position.
It is disappointing because we should have taken that next step after last year, that top 2 was within our grasp but we haven't come out and shown we are a top 4 contender. Only people that are content being mediocre should be happy with how we are going.
50/50 is not good given the circumstances though, if we had beaten the teams we had lost to then the Crows would be a team travelling at 3-3 while Hawks and Port would be travelling at 2-4. We have missed a golden opportunity to be well entrenched in the top 2, like Fremantle, and set ourselves up for a home final and double chance.
But no, we are 3-3 cruising in 9th position in the Brad Scott mediocre position.
It is disappointing because we should have taken that next step after last year, that top 2 was within our grasp but we haven't come out and shown we are a top 4 contender. Only people that are content being mediocre should be happy with how we are going.
get a grip man
top 2 is possible if we have our top 22 all playing 100%
absolutely every player at their best
they play finals in Sept
Jeez Taz, normally I enjoy your posts, but why the overwhelming negativity ? Where were Sydney at the same stage last year ? Pretty sure they were 3 from 6 with an easier draw than we've had and they finished top of the ladder
Its only 6 rounds in. We've had lots of injuries, and crap preseasons in a number of players. Lots of upside there. Nothing like a win to kick start things & who cares how the win happens
Well this thread has gone south hasn't it.
Would someone please mail me a razor (hard work with an electric razor) so I can rectify the situation?
Personally I find it telling that people who have backed the Scott era, some veteran posters, who historically post with a balanced oulook, have begun to voice some concerns as to our prognosis.Well this thread has gone south hasn't it.
Would someone please mail me a razor (hard work with an electric razor) so I can rectify the situation?
Personally I find it telling that people who have backed the Scott era, some veteran posters, who historically post with a balanced oulook, have begun to voice some concerns as to our prognosis.
I know people like to paint either a black or white position on here, but generally I think most supporters live in the grey. Not vehemently negative, not fanatically positive.
Anybody who fails to acknowledge both good as well as the bad probably aren't worth listening to.
Yep, my way of thinking too.Lol at "Freo are ripe".
Ripe to smash us over there, maybe.
I think the next 6 games will tell us all we need to know regarding our chances come September.
We have had a tough draw to this point. and to be 3-3 is not the end of the world. We are starting to get players back, but overall its our midfield that is really letting us down, which doesn't make much sense given Goldy's work.
*
Freo
Collingwood
West Coast
Sydney
GWS
Before the bye. At absolute worst we would want to be 7-5, but really should expect to be 8-4 if we are going to be worthy of a place in the 8.
Our second half of the season is much much easier than the first half. Just need to tick wins off now when we aren't playing well and hope we can start to put it together in the second half of the season.
I'm kinda forced to believe or I'll look like more of a man tit than usual.
And there it is from Mr. Blonde, a good balanced post bringing back some sanity. Thank goodness.
Much much better than one of Tas's typically negative posts. Has Tas ever posted anything remotely positive? The (North Melbourne) world is indeed a very dark dark place it seems when viewed through Tas's eyes.
This is the rest of the draw:
Essendon
Freo
Collingwood
West Coast
Sydney
GWS
------------------------ Bye
Gold Coast
Geelong
Essendon
Brisbane
Carlton
Melbourne
St Kilda
Fremantle
Western Bulldogs
Richmond
Very very few gimmes in that, obviously a case could be made for a big run after the bye leading into Fremantle, but the damage may already be done by that stage.
Really think we are looking at 6-6 or worse going into the bye in current form, I'd mark down Sydney/Fremantle as losses in current form given our inability to execute against pressure sides; Essendon, Collingwood, West Coast and GWS are genuine 50-50 games taking into account both sides form this season. We have the potential to beat all of those 4, but my head tells me we are dropping at least 1 of them.
If we are 6-6 or worse, we pretty much need a 6 or 7 games winning streak after the bye to make finals, I think in current form top 4 is a pipe dream.
Yep lets say we win 4/6 before the bye and i'm being generous on current form..This is the rest of the draw:
Essendon
Freo
Collingwood
West Coast
Sydney
GWS
------------------------ Bye
Gold Coast
Geelong
Essendon
Brisbane
Carlton
Melbourne
St Kilda
Fremantle
Western Bulldogs
Richmond
Very very few gimmes in that, obviously a case could be made for a big run after the bye leading into Fremantle, but the damage may already be done by that stage.
Really think we are looking at 6-6 or worse going into the bye in current form, I'd mark down Sydney/Fremantle as losses in current form given our inability to execute against pressure sides; Essendon, Collingwood, West Coast and GWS are genuine 50-50 games taking into account both sides form this season. We have the potential to beat all of those 4, but my head tells me we are dropping at least 1 of them.
If we are 6-6 or worse, we pretty much need a 6 or 7 games winning streak after the bye to make finals, I think in current form top 4 is a pipe dream.
It's round 6.