- Banned
- #201
Evidence:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I'm a believer in time travel, but not what is seen in most movies, where a person takes themselves out of a timeline and can reappear at another era
I believe there is people who can go backwards/forwards in their own timeline, and age accordingly
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
There's many answers to this.
Here's a few that will leave more questions then answers:
1) just by being present, the observe will actually change events. "whatever you observe you also change." someone else might see the observer and alert you causing you to change your actions.
Thus causing a paradox simply by being present.
2) all "time" happens at once we perceive time as a continual flowing process.
So him seeing the CCTV footage wasn't actually "in the future" but at the same exact moment. Only the observes perspective has changed.
3) paradox impossibilty. The past cannot be changed no matter what. This would mean when viewing the CCTV footage the observer had no way of knowing it but he had "already" traveled to the past from the perspective of the subject.
Explain it more simply, he couldn't have traveled to the past unless he had already traveled to the past.
So let's say I'm the observer your the subject.
In 2025 I watch footage of the past which shows you crossing the road in 2014 then travel there and watch you the subject cross the road.
In 2025 from your perspective I was watching you in 2014. The event has already happened for you. in order for it to have happened it must have always happened.
My future actual is the past (from your perspective) so like you, my own actions have also already occurred. because as far as the universe is concerned my very presents is a paradox. I'm not supposed to be present and if paradoxes are impossible then it must mean I was always watching you in 2014. My future must be a set event.
I believe time is constantHow would that work?
I'd still manage to stuff it up. I'd end up puuting the money on race 5 instead of race 6 or something.Just send me forward to Monday night so I can get all the scores, and then back to Friday...I can miss the working week, head on down to the TAB, and be in the West Indies on the beach by the following weekend...
Let's kick it off with what was an internet sensation a couple of years ago - The Charlie Chaplin time traveller.
A photographer going through behind the scenes footage from Chaplin's The Circus found some footage of a woman apparently talking on a mobile phone.
God knows how she got reception back in the past, when we barely get it in the present, but that's another thing.
Perhaps she really is a time-traveller, sent back through the decades to make a jaw-dropping cameo appearance.
Or maybe she was a maverick genius, secretly testing out advanced technology for the government and caught on camera at the wrong moment.
Whatever the explanation, this footage from a Charlie Chaplin promotional film in 1928 showing a woman apparently using a mobile phone has left viewers stumped.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1324132/Time-traveller-woman-mobile-phone-1928-Charlie-Chaplin-film.html#ixzz2rU8gibzJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Here's the clip:
Here's a short Youtube documentary.
Good movie, worth watching.Check out the sci-fi film ''The Man From Earth''
Not exactly time travel, but sorta related as it's about someone who is immortal.
I came across a claimed time traveller once, that barely has an online presence now, though somewhere I still have all the documents.So theres been one time travel patent, supposedly from the future.
Once a second one gets lodged, I reckon its game on, especially if it appears in the patent register some time after the lodgement date
On a slightly different note, we are talking about real time in the real world. What about computer time in the computer modelled world ?
Imagine if sending messages back in time can happen reltively cheaply at sub atomic level for shortish time periods.
At the moment we have supercomputers which model scientific hypotheses, sometimes taking a long long time.
What if the computer curcuits could give feedback backwards in time. The results could be known much earlier and wasted computations down blind alleys could be cancelled. It would be enormous.
Im not thinking programming here but feedback loops within individual micro curcuits.
A machine would be so much more intelligent, more human like with what we call hunches, but still have its massive exact logic.
Whats to say human brains dont already do this ? Have feedback frmo thoughts before they are actually processed ?
Whats to say animals can also sense the future, albeit in amore instinctive than reasoning way ?
Nah. Load of bollocks. There's no device. Her fingers are spread evenly, and you can see her thumb. The black shape in front of her little finger is a shadow, cast by the same angle producing the shadow across her face, but the black shape doesn't extend out past her palm towards her mouth. A telltale sign she's not holding anything occurs in the instant the shot fades into the next - her fingers start to move downward independently, the spacing changing, and you can also see past the gap between her palm and cheek - just shadow. Why she seems to be talking to herself, who knows, but if you walk down any given city mall you'll see that sort of thing all the time...!Let's kick it off with what was an internet sensation a couple of years ago - The Charlie Chaplin time traveller.
A photographer going through behind the scenes footage from Chaplin's The Circus found some footage of a woman apparently talking on a mobile phone.
God knows how she got reception back in the past, when we barely get it in the present, but that's another thing.
Perhaps she really is a time-traveller, sent back through the decades to make a jaw-dropping cameo appearance.
Or maybe she was a maverick genius, secretly testing out advanced technology for the government and caught on camera at the wrong moment.
Whatever the explanation, this footage from a Charlie Chaplin promotional film in 1928 showing a woman apparently using a mobile phone has left viewers stumped.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1324132/Time-traveller-woman-mobile-phone-1928-Charlie-Chaplin-film.html#ixzz2rU8gibzJ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Here's the clip:
Here's a short Youtube documentary.
If you sent a sports almanac back to 1930s, saying hawthorn had just threepeated, and won the most flags in the next 80 years, not sure those people would think it very probable
You could have sent it to 2010 and got the same result...If you sent a sports almanac back to 1930s, saying hawthorn had just threepeated, and won the most flags in the next 80 years, not sure those people would think it very probable
You can buy them from the hollywood movie prop shop in downtown LA.Where do you get these almanacs? I've never seen one in my life.
Well... something can only move across space, over time.We send remote control machinery across space so it makes sense we do it with time too.
Maybe UFOs are just observation drones. Much safer to send something flying back in time
if time is fluid and not lineal then time travelers would be here now and it would be evident.