- Mar 12, 2003
- 2,648
- 3,468
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Norwood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Would be nice if I could watch it.On that note, how awesome is the Perth test match with their stupid time zone. Means I can sit here and watch the cricket til 8PM.![]()

Starcy!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'll go back and read now ....don't go anywhere![]()
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/afl/mor...t-afl-commission/story-e6frf9jf-1226526986690It had appeared the Crows' and Tippett's AFL hearing was drawing closer to an end after inaugural Crows chairman Bob Hammond left AFL House about 11.30am
Starcy, again!
How would they have the slightest idea![]()
Given that they are actually there in person, I imagine they got a progress report at lunch time. Jeez folks, calm down.Is that why they have been there since 7.30am?
Yep ...as a glass half full guy i have found myself this week in the empty halfCome on mate be real. There have been negotiations and no doubt plenty has been agreed. But there is still a process to go through. This has really got to you in the last few days!

The AFL is coming out to give the journalists an update on proceedings and timingGiven that they are actually there in person, I imagine they got a progress report at lunch time. Jeez folks, calm down.
Shoud have played from the first test
Our attack has lacked variety and was desperately in need of a left arm quick
Bye bye Hilfy
Is the length of time that this hearing is taking a good sign or a bad sign??
Possibilities
Each side and individual is presenting so much evidence in their favour which has lenthened the hearing beyond what was originally anticipated - allowing for due process
The AFL Commission aren't happy with the plea bargain struck because it is too severe
The AFL Commission aren't happy with the plea bargain struck because it is too lenient
The AFL Commission members can't agree on the penalty.
The AFC are arguing vigorously that there is no evidence of exceeding the salary cap (they said they were going to do that)
which potentially would knock back one of the main charges against them
The AFL have come up with more damning evidence (unlikely because it would cause the hearing to be abandoned on the basis of natural justice.)
One of the individuals is fighting tooth and nail v their charges (Likely suspects Tippett, Trigg, Harper in that order)
Thoughts anyone??
Who gives a crap what we get for Kurt, I just hope there's another 5 days left i this thread.