Tippett's Gone - READ RULES BEFORE POSTING

Which AFC deserter were/are you most salty towards?


  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

headache1

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Posts
10,171
Likes
13,701
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sacramento Kings, Arsenal
No, it wasn't. It was unders, but it wasn't ridiculously under. I'd say the ongoing speculation about the side agreement had a fair bit to do with the deal being scrutinised more than the offer itself.
It seems that this is an opinion shared exclusively by Swans supporters. Should give you some insight into its validity.
 

Vader

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Posts
39,745
Likes
19,797
Location
Canberra
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Norwood, Adelaide Crows
Surely if you are interested in a player in their own right, as JT actually looks a very good prospect to me, you are able to treat that player as though he has no relative at the club. It would be crazy to say we can pay for John Smith say to come and play at Westies because we want to have a close look at him but we can't do the same with Joel Tippett.
That would breach rule 2.2:
2.3 Contracts
2.3.1 Contract of Service
No Player shall be engaged by a Club other than under the Contract of Service lodged with the AFL. The Contract of Service shall be in the
form prescribed from time to time by the AFL and the AFLPA.
Remember how GC had to get special permission from the AFL when they wanted to bring Swallow over from Perth 12 months early? The situation you have described is no different.

Besides which nobody in their right mind is going to believe that we paid JT to come over to Adelaide, to play in the SANFL, so that we could keep an eye on him with the intention of rookie listing him if things went well. The reasoning behind these payments were reported far too widely in the media.

Like it or not, JT is definitely "an Associate of a player" and thus all payments made to him need to be disclosed under the TPP rules.
 

Vader

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 14, 2005
Posts
39,745
Likes
19,797
Location
Canberra
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Norwood, Adelaide Crows
26 if you include the Viney debacle
Viney is a F/S selection. That can happen any year. GC & GWS were under no obligation to bid for him - and they would have been stupid to do so, given that he wasn't one of the two most highly rated kids in the country.
 

Rave Slave

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Posts
5,983
Likes
4,231
Location
Your Underwear
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Dick Slapperman
It's kind of surreal that a week ago I was backing my club in to the hilt. I was feeling so proud of the stance they were taking and the fact we were willing to stick to our guns. I was feeling so much venom towards Sydney and Kurt and my opinion of their entire football club had changed. I'd lost all respect for them and I had nothing but anger. Fast track to this news breaking and all that venom has gone. The pride has completely diminished and even some of my anger towards Kurt has disappeared.

All that's left is a sense of anger, disgust and deja vu towards our football administration. I don't hate the Swans for any of this any more. They did what they did because they thought they could get away with it. It's smart business. I'd hope my club would do the same in a similar position. Whilst I think Blucher and Tippett are still fkwits I don't blame them for trying to take advantage of the agreement either. Blucher's job is to make as much money as possible for his client and whilst he's a complete and utter moron for the way he's handled this, his punishment is that he's basically killed his own career.

The blame, anger, resentment and shame lies solely at the feet of the administration who executed this deal and thought in some way this was a wise move. Not only did they then hide this but they were handed a sensational exit package from Brisbane in the form of a first and second Rounder last year and proceeded to knock it back. Their efforts in agreeing to this and letting this princess completely roger us has damaged our brand, it'll impact upon future tilts at the premiership and without sounding too hypocritical it'll impact upon any contract negotiations over the next few years (any potential shady grey areas we could've taken advantage of are now slammed shut to us because the AFL will go over all our dealings with a fine tooth comb).

The only way forwards for this is organisation a complete and open honesty with the fans (something our club isn't exactly notorious for). Anyone who knew about this dealing, anyone who partook in this dealing, anyone who helped hide this dealing must go. Immediately. Whoever is left that plans on staying within the organisation should have to go back through the selection process again. Clean out the entire back office and do so with complete transparency. It's not actually possible to make amends for this garbage but the club needs to show it has the ability to take out the trash that caused this whole drama.
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Posts
3,255
Likes
2,075
Location
South Australia
AFL Club
Adelaide
It seems that this is an opinion shared exclusively by Swans supporters. Should give you some insight into its validity.
It's funny. Even one of Sydney idiot mods claimed that all neutral supporters thought White +23 was viable and fair and only 'delusional crows supporters' thought otherwise...:rolleyes:
 
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Posts
3,255
Likes
2,075
Location
South Australia
AFL Club
Adelaide
Rendall on the skewing of the draft in 2010:

"Unfortunately for the system this year and next year, everyone is out 10 picks," Rendell said. "If you have players coming in, you're getting bargains, if you have players going out and nothing coming in, you're in a worse position. The 33 really was 23 last year, so it's actually a better deal than Mumford, it was our second-round pick."

I thought the reference would have been pretty well known.



Really? Apparently Reid, Rohan, Mitchell, Parker et al were being shopped around for high picks in order to satisfy the trade. Indeed, there were crows fans on this thread's partner gloating about how Sydney were going to have to lose Parker or Rohan.

That said, I think the club was aware of it, considering everybody in the league who had an interest would have been aware of it, but if given the choice between 23 and 33 I would have thought the choice would have been pretty easy. Unless Brisbane or the Suns decided they were going to disregard that agreement.
Your starting to get on my nerves. You insult us on your own board then come over here and talk shite. You also continually vomit the same verbal diarrhea all over big footy. I think I speak for the entire Adelaide board when I say that we've had enough of your arrogant shit so piss off!
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Posts
2,067
Likes
937
Location
adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
I really think maybe more from hope that we are not going to get hurt from this fiasco too much but longer no feedback with draft drawing to close gets big worry.
Surely no matter who you believe Blucher and Tippett should be in more trouble than us and of course Swans are not clean as they have been forcing us to bad deal due to their knowledge of this agreement .
Which is real tampering of trade and draft as using this agreement & money to steal Kurt from other clubs .
All really we were doing was keeping a pampered player happy.
However AFL have managed to rape us with Suns and GWS entry etc so will not be surprised again.
This in no matter what result we get has destroyed any hopes of using trade period to improve like other top 5 teams have .
Key issue to us supporters is the amount of lies we have been told by our club and Harper and Trigg surely must lose jobs no matter what outcome.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Stiffy_18

Premium Platinum
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Posts
37,871
Likes
11,930
Location
who cares
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sacramento Kings
Look this whole Tippettgate is bad...in fact REALLY BAD for us!

BUT, let's not kid ourselves that we are the only club that enter into these shady dealings. All clubs enter into shady agreements with their players especially bigger clubs that have a wider range of resources to work with.

That is not going to help us of course because we will cop an absolute pounding in all this and it serves us right for being stupid enough to put it in writing. It also should serve as a lesson to greedy types out there that it DOES come back to bite you on the ass!

Not only will Tippett not get his $4million (he will get less) but he will be ridiculed and known as a dodgy greedy character.

It should also serve as a lesson to controlling parents that your actions and controlling ways can ruin your children's career and reputation.
 

Geoffa32

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Posts
42,841
Likes
34,579
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
The Autobots and Team America
Not sure how that makes you feel any better.

Let's hope that for Adelaide's sake, that all this is not quite as bad as is being suggested by the media.
Makes me feel better because we can "afford" to miss this years draft. Still not good, but if that is our sanction we can survive, and should not have any impact on the next couple of years.
 

Smoooothy

TAKE THAT BACK!!
Joined
Jan 12, 2005
Posts
23,100
Likes
19,646
Location
Brunswick
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
North Adelaide; ConeyIslandWarriors
Look this whole Tippettgate is bad...in fact REALLY BAD for us!

BUT, let's not kid ourselves that we are the only club that enter into these shady dealings. All clubs enter into shady agreements with their players especially bigger clubs that have a wider range of resources to work with.

That is not going to help us of course because we will cop an absolute pounding in all this and it serves us right for being stupid enough to put it in writing. It also should serve as a lesson to greedy types out there that it DOES come back to bite you on the arse!

Not only will Tippett not get his $4million (he will get less) but he will be ridiculed and known as a dodgy greedy character.

It should also serve as a lesson to controlling parents that your actions and controlling ways can ruin your children's career and reputation.
if there is a league wide investigation, i'd be very surprised if every other club is completely squeeky clean
 

Hodgy

Club Legend
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Posts
1,301
Likes
1,707
Location
Adelaide Hills
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Red Bull F1
It's kind of surreal that a week ago I was backing my club in to the hilt. I was feeling so proud of the stance they were taking and the fact we were willing to stick to our guns. I was feeling so much venom towards Sydney and Kurt and my opinion of their entire football club had changed. I'd lost all respect for them and I had nothing but anger. Fast track to this news breaking and all that venom has gone. The pride has completely diminished and even some of my anger towards Kurt has disappeared.

All that's left is a sense of anger, disgust and deja vu towards our football administration. I don't hate the Swans for any of this any more. They did what they did because they thought they could get away with it. It's smart business. I'd hope my club would do the same in a similar position. Whilst I think Blucher and Tippett are still fkwits I don't blame them for trying to take advantage of the agreement either. Blucher's job is to make as much money as possible for his client and whilst he's a complete and utter moron for the way he's handled this, his punishment is that he's basically killed his own career.

The blame, anger, resentment and shame lies solely at the feet of the administration who executed this deal and thought in some way this was a wise move. Not only did they then hide this but they were handed a sensational exit package from Brisbane in the form of a first and second Rounder last year and proceeded to knock it back. Their efforts in agreeing to this and letting this princess completely roger us has damaged our brand, it'll impact upon future tilts at the premiership and without sounding too hypocritical it'll impact upon any contract negotiations over the next few years (any potential shady grey areas we could've taken advantage of are now slammed shut to us because the AFL will go over all our dealings with a fine tooth comb).

The only way forwards for this is organisation a complete and open honesty with the fans (something our club isn't exactly notorious for). Anyone who knew about this dealing, anyone who partook in this dealing, anyone who helped hide this dealing must go. Immediately. Whoever is left that plans on staying within the organisation should have to go back through the selection process again. Clean out the entire back office and do so with complete transparency. It's not actually possible to make amends for this garbage but the club needs to show it has the ability to take out the trash that caused this whole drama.
What sanctamonious dribble. You don't blame the Swans because you say they "thought they could get away with it, it's smart business" how is that any different than what you are saying we did and to say it's fair enough for a player and agent to break the rules because their job is to get the most money possible is equally stupid. And to cap it off to blame the whole administration before we have any details is just pathetic, for all you know this is just an email from John Reid that no one else has seen. How about you wait until you have at least seen the charge sheet before you organise the lynch mob.

With supporters like you, who needs enemies.
 

Stiffy_18

Premium Platinum
Joined
Dec 14, 2002
Posts
37,871
Likes
11,930
Location
who cares
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Sacramento Kings
Makes me feel better because we can "afford" to miss this years draft. Still not good, but if that is our sanction we can survive, and should not have any impact on the next couple of years.
I tend to agree but then will the AFL look at that and decide to increase our punishment because missing a year or 2 of draft picks is not severe enough?

As I mentioned in one of the posts, we are in much better position that Carlton was list wise. We seem to have a replacement in the wings for every player that is comings towards the end of his career bar Truck.

Thommo will finish up in 2-4 years and we have Crouch in the wings. Johncock has become replaceable even this year and there are players in the wings who are already taking his spot.

A lot of good kids performing well in the SANFL and pushing for selection already so I have this nervous feeling that AFL are aware of this and will come down heavier on us than a lot of people think precisely because we are in good position list wise.
 

Geoffa32

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 17, 2007
Posts
42,841
Likes
34,579
Location
Adelaide
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
The Autobots and Team America
I tend to agree but then will the AFL look at that and decide to increase our punishment because missing a year or 2 of draft picks is not severe enough?

As I mentioned in one of the posts, we are in much better position that Carlton was list wise. We seem to have a replacement in the wings for every player that is comings towards the end of his career bar Truck.

Thommo will finish up in 2-4 years and we have Crouch in the wings. Johncock has become replaceable even this year and there are players in the wings who are already taking his spot.

A lot of good kids performing well in the SANFL and pushing for selection already so I have this nervous feeling that AFL are aware of this and will come down heavier on us than a lot of people think precisely because we are in good position list wise.
Hopefully we know sooner than latter.
 

Stripple

Club Legend
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Posts
1,628
Likes
648
AFL Club
Adelaide
So wh
It was unders, but he's out of contract. In terms of the arrangement, it's overs.
so when there is like 50 teams in the leauge pick 50 will equal pick 1 because they are both first rounders? Riiiiiigghhhttt.

Keep burying your head in the sand. The offer was not unders because he was uncontracted it was unders because of the clause. What you offered was the equivalent of a second round pick. Pick 17 went to Collingwood for an uncontracted player who nominated one club in wellingham.

What about Ireland saying there was a clause in his first interview on trade radio?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom