I think this sums it up best.
Great point; that frm this thread, or another board?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I think this sums it up best.
Melbourne would get Caddy and Viney for picks 4 and 26. Clearly better than now where they need to us picks 3 and 13, Hence why the AFL wouldn't let it happen.
Just about fell off my chair.A big, strong marking forward like Kurt has obviously been identified as a need for the Swans. We can't expect our mids to kick the majority of goals all the time. We could keep LRT in the backline, Pyke and Mummy wouldn't need to push forward as hard and often which would allow them to concentrate on their rucking.
Think he'd be a good fit ... strong depth is a good thing eh ?
If we chase hard for him then that's ok by me ... Seaby or our first draft pick sounds about right.
Seaby..Just thought I'd mosey on over to the Sydney board to have a look - and then I saw this:
Just about fell off my chair.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I think that makes it funnier, to be honest.Woeful attempt at trying to cover up the actual second four on his guernsey haha.
can you sign a verbal agreement ???
He's fighting for BF survival ......think he said that he would quit BF if his sources were not spot on
This place is better for his entertainment .....I am sure he'd be forgiven, but we may have to take a poll![]()
Do you really suffer from Attention Deficit Disorder?
There was a "Gentleman's Agreement" at the end of 2009 that if Kurt extended his current one year contract to a three year contract then Adelaide would trade him to the Gold Coast Suns at the end of 2012 if Kurt wanted to go home. The compensation for the trade would be comparable to the compensation for losing a player to Gold Coast at the end of 2010. No, it wasn't written in the contract, but the agreement was well known to Kurt and his management, the AFC and the GCS.
At the end of last season the AFC saw the writing on the wall. They desperately tried to get Kurt to sign a new contract but he said he needed more thinking time. Knowing that the Gold Coast was his desired destination the Crows tried to quietly negotiate a deal with the Lions but they didn't take the bait. Gold Coast countered by offering a "Contract" to Kurt at the end of last year (yes Wayno, that would be in writing).
So what's happening now? Even the AFC can't work out exactly why he has been applying for "Tool of the Week". They are still negotiating with the Gold Coast about the appropriate compensation for Kurt. Ignore the sabre rattling, the fact that the GCS finished 17th has dramatically reduced the threat of the AFC ignoring the "Gentleman's Agreement". The GCS can try to screw us in the pre-season draft but that would be just provoking a club with a bag of bank notes in their pocket.
Nothing has changed from an AFC point of view. Bookmark It, Wayno.
Is there a single thing you've ever gotten right? Ever?Havent been wrong with one yet
This is why I never post in absolutes. Because if there's a chance for me to be wrong, you can bet on it I'll be wrong, and often in spectacular fashion too.Is there a single thing you've ever gotten right? Ever?
You have a truly outstanding record on this board, of being the poster who has a unique ability to be wrong about absolutely everything.
I was looking over the other thread and really got very confused with everything you came up with. You have been all over the shop so I really don't know what to think.
Its not really that confusing, obviously he received some info around the 22nd of August, prior to that it was just his opinion.
Since the 22nd of August AFGM has been pretty consistent. To date I have heard nothing that disproves the information he shared with us then.
Polec for Tippett straight swap: win/win
Who's on board?
Do you really think a board member would be leaking info like this to a nobody on an internet forum? Cmon.Its not really that confusing, obviously he received some info around the 22nd of August, prior to that it was just his opinion.
Since the 22nd of August AFGM has been pretty consistent. To date I have heard nothing that disproves the information he shared with us then.
Polec for Tippett straight swap: win/win
Who's on board?
Everyone from Brisbane, I suspect.
Would that be any worse that what we get for Caddy? Fills our need for an outside midfielder and a former top 5 pickEveryone from Brisbane, I suspect.
Do you really think a board member would be leaking info like this to a nobody on an internet forum? Cmon.
Jenny, Jenny, Jenny.
My comments regarding him remaining were a dig at the MOB who kept proclaiming that players only wanted to leave the Crows because of Neil Craig. Prior to 15 August I was baiting the MOB since I knew what was going to happen. (e.g. There is no chance that he will leave. Just the normal argy bargy that occurs when gun players negotiate a new contract. We have only lost players in recent years because the coach "lost" the players. Money or the go home factor will not be a determining factor, .P.S. I still think Kurt will stay, he has an outstanding relationship with his coach and money or the go home factor will not play a major role in his decision). Since I was given the nod to go my hardest in mid August my posts have been perfectly consistent (other than the odd sarcastic comment).
When all is revealed you and the rest of the lynch mob can reassure yourself that I have just been very lucky with my guesses. Talking of which, how do you reconcile what has happened with all the good oil that you shared with us from your "sources".
P.S. If I am wrong it's not just must avatar that's going, I'll be gone forever.