Remove this Banner Ad

To early to Offload Stevens?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Pft you guys are full of it

egotistic fools

its fools like you that warrant this no passengers board, to have solid conversation without idiots claiming they are DT gods

im with weagles_fan on this one. You dont need to be a DT gun to be knowledgable

They are just making a bet..
PS how do you score an invite to this no passengers board? It is very exclusive? I believe I would be able to contribute to a reasonable level.
 
They are just making a bet..
PS how do you score an invite to this no passengers board? It is very exclusive? I believe I would be able to contribute to a reasonable level.

suprise suprise so does everyone else

listen, we are not after people who talk there own team up, and repeativly use there ranking as a indicator of there ego and skill

Also we dont want post whores

and asking for an invite dosnt normally get you one, but it puts you lower down the order
 
suprise suprise so does everyone else

listen, we are not after people who talk there own team up, and repeativly use there ranking as a indicator of there ego and skill

Also we dont want post whores

and asking for an invite dosnt normally get you one, but it puts you lower down the order (great_source)

Is what we see of the no passengers thread all that is posted?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

suprise suprise so does everyone else

listen, we are not after people who talk there own team up, and repeativly use there ranking as a indicator of there ego and skill

Also we dont want post whores

and asking for an invite dosnt normally get you one, but it puts you lower down the order

I was just asking mate. No need to get all defensive. To be honest, if the members of the board are as elitist as you, I wouldn't want to participate. I also like your instant categorisation of me as a 'post whore' after reading two sentences from me. I do not talk my own team up, even though I am inside the top 200. Enjoy belittling others whilst feigning ignorance over your own incompetence.
 
I was just asking mate. No need to get all defensive. To be honest, if the members of the board are as elitist as you, I wouldn't want to participate. I also like your instant categorisation of me as a 'post whore' after reading two sentences from me. I do not talk my own team up, even though I am inside the top 200. Enjoy belittling others whilst feigning ignorance over your own incompetence.

Stiffy ( like the name BTW)

The No Passengers board was established by a Big Footy moderator to generate some discussion from established posters which was less quantity and (hopefully) of a sound quality.

One of the main reasons was so that weekly discussion on the "hot" topics could be analysed and summarised with the more interesting parts of the discussion posted on the main board in a separate thread for all posters to view in a succinct format. As you would have seen there are some excellent quality posts on the main board but they do get lost in the volume of lower quality items each week.

Hopefully this way some useful information is available for everyone in 1 thread to digest. There will hopefully be a thread for captains choices, weekly topics and a panel for main board posters to ask Q & As which can be answered with a level of solid analysis.

I'm sorry if this sounds elitest, it's certainly not meant to be that way, simply a way to get good information to all posters in the easiest possible way.
 
nop, much more

Bit disappointing that it's turned into a EDT style forum.

A thread in which only the members are allowed to post and others could view would be excellent, IMO.

Both threads could exist, and members could choose which of their posts could be seen by members only, and which posts could be accessed by everyone.

The posting of some of the points raised in the thread is OK, but I want more!!
 
Bit disappointing that it's turned into a EDT style forum.

A thread in which only the members are allowed to post and others could view would be excellent, IMO.

Both threads could exist, and members could choose which of their posts could be seen by members only, and which posts could be accessed by everyone.

The posting of some of the points raised in the thread is OK, but I want more!!

I guess the main difference to EDT Kai is that the information is shared with everybody.

As to your 2nd point, spot on. This is exactly what was wanted but the system would not allow it, so this is unfortunately this is the best the can be done. Sorry.


Anyway, enough chat about this. Back to Stevens, and in particular Vs N Jones. Interesting battle for the 6 spot in my forward line due to trade issues. Stevens currently averaging 82 and Jones 71. Who is the better long term keeper?
 
Bit disappointing that it's turned into a EDT style forum.

A thread in which only the members are allowed to post and others could view would be excellent, IMO.

Both threads could exist, and members could choose which of their posts could be seen by members only, and which posts could be accessed by everyone.

The posting of some of the points raised in the thread is OK, but I want more!!

Great idea mate, not sure if it's possible in these forums, but ill forward your post to StKildonan (a dreamteam mod).

edit: just read 54 dogs' post and apparantely its not possible! bummer!

As for the Jones vs Stevens debate, I'd say Stevens will probably average higher. Just because Jones is coping pretty heavy tags and doesnt have the support around him that Stevens does. Stevens copping tags too, but sharing them with Judd and a few others. So yeah, my guess is that Stevens will average 5-10 points more. Just a guess though.
 
Back to Stevens, and in particular Vs N Jones. Interesting battle for the 6 spot in my forward line due to trade issues. Stevens currently averaging 82 and Jones 71. Who is the better long term keeper?

Nick Stevens has averaged above 78 for nine consecutive seasons (averaging 85+ in three of these years).

On the other hand, this is N.Jones' third season. Last year he averaged 70.4. After 5 games this year he is averaging only 71.4.

Stevens has his measure by a long stretch in my opinion.
 
I was seriously considering doing:

Jones>Stevens
Barlow>Burgoyne
or
Dyson>Stevens
Jones>Murphy

I don't know what come over me seeing as everyone wants to offload him. :D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I agree to early with his BE of 53 which should be easy enough to cover this week. Probably another $20,000 to gain. I guess the $ in the bank would be the limiter to who to trade up to.
 
His current average is 82.2, which puts his real price at $332,000. If he scores his current average for 3 more weeks his price will be up to $320,000 which is $20,000 above his current price of $300,000. If he scores his average this week his price will rise to $310,000. In addition to this a lot of the premium midfielders have high break evens this round and will probably drop further (Dane Swan, Joel Corey, Scott Thompson, Simon Goodwin, Sam Mitchell, Luke Hodge, Kane Cornes, Daniel Cross) so if I was to trade him out I would be waiting at least this week.

Personally, I believe he'll average between 85-90, which means he's quite possibly a keeper and at the very least I will wait to trade him out due to more pressing upgrades.
 
I was seriously considering doing:

Jones>Stevens
Barlow>Burgoyne
or
Dyson>Stevens
Jones>Murphy

I don't know what come over me seeing as everyone wants to offload him. :D
Dog trade getting Stevens in IMO. The boat has sailed, the cow has mooed, the train has left the station, insert euphemism of choice here.

Upshot is, he's too close to his likely final price to make that trade worthwhile. It's sideways. If you feel you just have to dump Jones or Dyson, at least do it for a genuine star. An upgrade should be a clear upgrade, not a 93 Magna for a 99 Falcon.

Barlow to Burgoyne would be a good trade though.
 
Dog trade getting Stevens in IMO. The boat has sailed, the cow has mooed, the train has left the station, insert euphemism of choice here.

Upshot is, he's too close to his likely final price to make that trade worthwhile. It's sideways. If you feel you just have to dump Jones or Dyson, at least do it for a genuine star. An upgrade should be a clear upgrade, not a 93 Magna for a 99 Falcon.

Barlow to Burgoyne would be a good trade though.

I was being a tad mischievious there.

I have 181k to upgrade any of Barlow/NJones/Dyson/BJones

Trying to upgrade 2 of them is a tough choice.
 
I was being a tad mischievious there.

I have 181k to upgrade any of Barlow/NJones/Dyson/BJones

Trying to upgrade 2 of them is a tough choice.


Bones, if you really want to upgrade 2 look at possibly

This week - NJones - Scotland / Power
Next weeek - Barlow - Milburn / Waters

Won't fit this week but will with expected price adjustments over 2 weeks.

If it was me, I would use 1 trade and go Dyson - Swan if you don't have him.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I dont know why people are trading Stevens this week. If he can average above 85 for the year and i think he will easily then i dont see why he cant be the 6th midfielder for the year. I think he will be averaging 90 for the 2nd half of the year. For me, he is way down on the trade priority and it would be very wasteful to get rid of him now at Round 6!!!!

If you want Kornes then get him some other way!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

To early to Offload Stevens?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top