Should go straight to the tribunal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Makes no difference
I think its interesting because it is outside of the general circumstances the afl want to allow forwards to do this.Yeah interesting one. I think he's OK.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
High contact isn't against the rules?What about the children!!! The AFL will make something up to rub him out.
No intent, not reckless, not against the rules.
How about high contactNot even sure about that. As far as I know he didn't break the rules.
Only the third one possibly it comes under and only possibly. He certainly never kicked him, wasn't intentional or even careless. I think Dalihaus ran into his foot.
But I do think also the AFL will find a way to get him.
Yeah i explained what i meant a bit more aboveIt wasn't a marking contest. The ball was handballed to him
High contact isn't against the rules?
Jesus mate. Even a high fend off with a hand is against the rules and a free is paid against.
I didn't say he did.Yes and a free kick was awarded for high contact. He didn't kick him.
How about high contact
Well Tom Hawkins gets away with this stuff every week
Get your hand off itBullshit
Kneeing someone in the back of the head when marking is a complete mistake. This action is gutless and could have been avoided.
Completely gutless action that wasn't needed. Just because he was scared he put his foot up.
Crude and gutless act.
this guys going to have a very short career - get his dumb ass outta here
I didn't say he did.
I was responding to you claiming it's not against the rules...that's just a lie