Tom Boyd

[DemonTim]

Violence happens on an AFL field and they don't police it like they should, that does NOT mean they should ignore off field violence.

So that's a no to you outraging over brad hill. How sad is life if you're THAT obsessed with hating on a footy player?

 

[MJ_Dogs]

The difference between last week and this week - is that violence has occurred this week. You can try downplay that all you like, but the point I was making was that after last weeks domestic violence issue, this week is not a great look. It is certainly a concern for the AFL, and if you are trying to suggest it isn't, then you are clueless.

Looks like the domestic violence campaigns aren't working. I'm not suggesting at all that violence isn't a concern. But you were drawing a connection with this incident to domestic violence, which isn't the case. I stated earlier that the one punch campaign is the greater concern for this type of violence.

 

[Farm Boy]

So that's a no to you outraging over brad hill. How sad is life if you're THAT obsessed with hating on a footy player?

I wasn't even in a Brad Hill thread. You are just making yourself look even sillier. Give it up bud.

 

[Kermit]

I wasn't even in a Brad Hill thread. You are just making yourself look even sillier. Give it up bud.

I think that was his point...

 

[Farm Boy]

Looks like the domestic violence campaigns aren't working. I'm not suggesting at all that violence isn't a concern. But you were drawing a connection with this incident to domestic violence, which isn't the case. I stated earlier that the one punch campaign is the greater concern for this type of violence.

The AFL can't be seen to cherry pick. They are hypocrites as it is. They can't shout domestic violence one week, stamp their feet up and down, when no violence has even taken place, but ignore violence the next week when it occurs. This latest issue shouldn't be absolved just because it isn't directly a domestic violence issue. That would be like saying, it is ok to smash another guy in the face because it wasn't classified as domestic violence.

 

[DemonTim]

I wasn't even in a Brad Hill thread. You are just making yourself look even sillier. Give it up bud.

Exactly the point. Bit simple, aren't ya?

You come into a thread to whinge about boyds violence, yet don't do the same, to a player, who in the last week had a case finalised against him for violence by the justice system

You don't give a shit about violence. You just want to pot Boyd (because for some strange reason saints fans are OBSESSED with him).

 

[DemonTim]

The AFL can't be seen to cherry pick. They are hypocrites as it is. They can't shout domestic violence one week, stamp their feet up and down, when no violence has even taken place, but ignore violence the next week when it occurs. This latest issue shouldn't be absolved just because it isn't directly a domestic violence issue. That would be like saying, it is ok to smash another guy in the face because it wasn't classified as domestic violence.

Again. Why are you only saying it about Boyd? Hill was charged. You're a moron.

 

[Farm Boy]

Exactly the point. Bit simple, aren't ya?

You come into a thread to whinge about boyds violence, yet don't do the same, to a player, who in the last week had a case finalised against him for violence by the justice system

You don't give a shit about violence. You just want to pot Boyd (because for some strange reason saints fans are OBSESSED with him).

So just because I don't lounge around in Brad Hill threads, and aren't specifically aware of his latest issue - all the sudden I don't care about violence. Gee, and you are the once calling me simple. Good one Tim.

 

[Defacto]

Sorry Purple. You're not convincing anyone here!

No im barrett

 

[DemonTim]

So just because I don't lounge around in Brad Hill threads, and aren't specifically aware of his latest issue - all the sudden I don't care about violence. Gee, and you are the once calling me simple. Good one Tim.

No. Because you jump into a thread about Boyd and pander about violence issues, yet ignore players being charged with violence. Strange. Considering that was also in the media and has a thread dedicated to it

Should I go back through your/Adams posting history? Did you put out your call to arms against krakour? Hurley? Setanta o halpin?

You just have issues with Boyd/the dogs (you even admitted it)

 

[Defacto]

Barrett is a cockroach with a face like a rat.

Tell us how you really feel about him robbo

 

[The Jack]

Boyd to the Dogs may end up being the biggest trading disaster in AFL history. It's looking more and more a possibility as every week rolls on. Not a certainty, but a chance.

Maybe even worse than the Lovett trade.

Luckily the Dogs still have the Bont. He will take them to the promised land.

 

[compact72]

Bulldogs need to implement a No dickhead policy and quick. Starting to worry about the #culture.

Worry about your own #culture with your player that drinks and drives

 

[Kram]

Tell us how you really feel about him robbo

I can assure you I look and act nothing like Slobbo, Mr Gossage

 

[luckysaint48]

Maybe even worse than the Lovett trade.

Nothing is worse than that trade. Does not even compare.

 

[Farm Boy]

No. Because you jump into a thread about Boyd and pander about violence issues, yet ignore players being charged with violence. Strange. Considering that was also in the media and has a thread dedicated to it

Should I go back through your/Adams posting history? Did you put out your call to arms against krakour? Hurley? Setanta o halpin?

You just have issues with Boyd/the dogs (you even admitted it)

Firstly, just because I don't know about specifically about those players - doesn't mean I am targeting Boyd. Secondly, their violence didn't come about a week after a national wide AFL issue on domestic violence.

 

[compact72]

Beverige is a known sook who had a cry to the AFL last year because the Bulldogs lost a final on their home turf. I think the club need to reign him in. The dog's off his chain!

lol what?

TBH we were entitled to play at Etihad, so we got screwed over there, however it's not a bad thing. We had every right to play at our home ground

 

[DemonTim]

Firstly, just because I don't know about specifically about those players - doesn't mean I am targeting Boyd. Secondly, their violence didn't come about a week after a national wide AFL issue on domestic violence.

Brad hills finalisation did...
Also are you sure? You'd have to check DV charities vs national recognition to show that. And considering you claim to have not known about them I don't know how you can make the claim.

You are targeting Boyd. You admitted it. I'm sure I'll see you making a thread on the NRL board about sammy. Since you're so very concerned about violence. Also look forward to seeing your thread linking jamar to DV

 

[Marc_Remillard]

Boyd to the Dogs may end up being the biggest trading disaster in AFL history. It's looking more and more a possibility as every week rolls on. Not a certainty, but a chance.

Maybe even worse than the Lovett trade.

Luckily the Dogs still have the Bont. He will take them to the promised land.

I think the trade will not work out well for the Doggies, I doubt that Boyd will ever become a really good AFL player. But the Doggies went out and got him at a time that they desperately needed a key forward. With their current set up they probably wouldn't have bothered to do it because they're building a very good team. I also doubt that they will lose anyone of importance because of Boy'd salary, the only area that it will affect is making it difficult to bring in Free Agents when they're in premiership mode over the next couple of years.

tl:dr?

Boyd won't make it but doggies are building a very good team regardless

 

[DemonTim]

I think the trade will not work out well for the Doggies, I doubt that Boyd will ever become a really good AFL player. But the Doggies went out and got him at a time that they desperately needed a key forward. With their current set up they probably wouldn't have bothered to do it because they're building a very good team. I also doubt that they will lose anyone of importance because of Boy'd salary, the only area that it will affect is making it difficult to bring in Free Agents when they're in premiership mode over the next couple of years.

tl:dr?

Boyd won't make it but doggies are building a very good team regardless

Spot on. Something like 14 players have re-signed with the dogs since.

 

[dave123]

Highlights that alcohol is still a problem in society

He will learn from it for sure ...probably frustrated at his injuries and not playing much .....built up anger

Someone lights a fuse ...usually over something meaningless like a comment about your car or something stupid ....boom

Pressure .....fuse ....someone lights fuse ....boom .....see it everyday with men

 

[Seedsfan]

Yeah and we have got close to the best defence in the league, majority of them are kids too, aints fans are just unhappy because Bulldogs will win a flag before them.

I couldn't careless in classic dogs style they will fail to make the GF and if you truly believe you have one of the best backline sulu are delusional. Your mids protect your backline against the top side like ie the game against Geelong your backline got exposed.

 

[Farm Boy]

Brad hills finalisation did...
Also are you sure? You'd have to check DV charities vs national recognition to show that. And considering you claim to have not known about them I don't know how you can make the claim.

You are targeting Boyd. You admitted it. I'm sure I'll see you making a thread on the NRL board about sammy. Since you're so very concerned about violence. Also look forward to seeing your thread linking jamar to DV

Nope, not targeting Boyd on this violence issue, you are stretching there. I am regularly on the case of the likes of Conca, Vickery, and other thugs I see partake in senseless violence. I question weekly on this board why Conca is not in jail. At the very least I believe the AFL should be consistent across violence. Whether it domestic violence, on field violence, or off field violence, they cannot just cherry pick - like they do. That isn't unreasonable Tim.

 

[DemonTim]

Nope, not targeting Boyd on this violence issue, you are stretching there. I am regularly on the case of the likes of Conca, Vickery, and other thugs I see partake in senseless violence. I question weekly on this board why Conca is not in jail. At the very least I believe the AFL should be consistent across violence. Whether it domestic violence, on field violence, or off field violence, they cannot just cherry pick - like they do. That isn't unreasonable Tim.

You literally admitted to constantly posting negatively about Boyd.

So now we've established you dislike Boyd. And like to call for unrealistic outcomes.

And then, you have the stupidity to question someone else for cherry picking, while doing it yourself.

I'm also a little concerned as to why you're still questioning why conca isn't in jail. It doesn't take much for you to get obsessed. Does it?

 

[Bokonon]

Barrett is a cockroach with a face like a rat.

You dont have to beat around the bush, give it to us straight.