- Sep 14, 2005
- 18,420
- 18,667
My point is Mitchell isn’t in Hawthorn’s next premiership team, thus you guys cashing in.I see hawthorn winning a flag in the next 8 years. We've won at least 1 flag every decade for quite a while now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My point is Mitchell isn’t in Hawthorn’s next premiership team, thus you guys cashing in.I see hawthorn winning a flag in the next 8 years. We've won at least 1 flag every decade for quite a while now.
My point is Mitchell isn’t in Hawthorn’s next premiership team, thus you guys cashing in.
Which do you see as more likely to occur?Absolutely. He could very easily be a major part of Collingwoods next premiership team though.
I think he would be a great fit
GWS now keen on Titchell.
Giants can likely offer Hawthorn a more attractive pick too.
Might be getting your wires crossed with the JOM interest perhaps mate?GWS now keen on Titchell.
Giants can likely offer Hawthorn a more attractive pick too.
Might be getting your wires crossed with the JOM interest perhaps mate?
Which do you see as more likely to occur?
Mitchell for pick 27 or Mitchell and 24 for pick 16?
I want the latter.Which do you see as more likely to occur?
Mitchell for pick 27 or Mitchell and 24 for pick 16?
I do not, i can imagine there's a good player at 25 or 27 (depending on if Henry is traded and we push for the other.)I want the latter.
Agreed, I'd rather 6, 24 & 27. We have a good record of developing talent and we REALLY need as much talented youth on the list as we can get.I do not, i can imagine there's a good player at 25 or 27 (depending on if Henry is traded and we push for the other.)
Add that with 24 & 6 and i am happy.
If GWS let us rob them like that, then they need to fold.Agreed, I'd rather 6, 24 & 27. We have a good record of developing talent and we REALLY need as much talented youth on the list as we can get.
Ideally add pick 19 if O'meara goes to GWS.
I'd even like to see a pick slide with turning pick 6 into multiple picks in the low teens once GWS finish trading out Hopper.
We aren't pushing Mitchell out two years in a row just to tell him sorry we need you to stay now, only way he stays is if Collingwood are not willing/able to give us something decent (27) or that pick slide.If GWS are offering 18 or 19 for O'Meara, the Mitchell deal may not get done. Would be brave to go into the season with Amon as our most experienced mid with Worpel another 50 games behind
GWS have shown they're happy to trade picks to move up the order. With how many high picks they have I could see them wanting to upgrade 2 picks into our pick 6.If GWS let us rob them like that, then they need to fold.
Why? The play has been made. Tom's not staying now.If GWS are offering 18 or 19 for O'Meara, the Mitchell deal may not get done. Would be brave to go into the season with Amon as our most experienced mid with Worpel another 50 games behind
If Collingwood don't offer something worthwhile now there is no point taking a pick that is 40+ as the other mids will get more time to grow in there with JOM gone. If we get something at least inside 30 we will still trade MitchellWhy? The play has been made. Tom's not staying now.
Do the Hawks want Poulter? I guess as steak knives maybe but other wise keep himJust trade poulter and a swap of picks.
He's a tall wingman so more a utility type. With Gunston going it makes a decent pickup I reckon.Do the Hawks want Poulter? I guess as steak knives maybe but other wise keep him
He’s gone.If Collingwood don't offer something worthwhile now there is no point taking a pick that is 40+ as the other mids will get more time to grow in there with JOM gone. If we get something at least inside 30 we will still trade Mitchell
Maybe not! Wrighty saying they may keep Grundy now!!He’s gone.
Bluff. We’ve seen all the Wrighty plays before.Maybe not! Wrighty saying they may keep Grundy now!!