Confirmed Tom Mitchell [traded to Hawthorn with pick 57 for pick 14 & 52]

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DapperJong

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Posts
34,749
Likes
63,689
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Juventus
Players from the other team keep getting all the votes even in games when we won easily.

Ive never seen so many losing teams get the 3 votes. Happening across all teams.
You said he was 40-50th best mid. He has 11 votes in a side that is basically all AA. What is this strange point you are making?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

kreglze

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Posts
13,062
Likes
10,007
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Gold Coast
Other Teams
Arsenal
I can see him perhaps looking at a big offer if the Swans win this weekend. He will have his premiership and look to make some hay while the sun is shining.
 

TazHawk15

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Sep 8, 2014
Posts
13,059
Likes
14,879
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
There are no other teams
Tom Mitchell should stay at the swans, club is in good shape and their window is open now, could win a couple of flags.
You obviously said the same thing about Danger last year I assume?

I mean Adelaide was in good shape and their window was and is wide open before Danger joined the club you support,So one can assume you thought Danger should have stayed a Crow.
 

HairyO

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
17,409
Likes
18,233
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Hey genius, they both ended up getting 12.
So Kennedy got 10 votes in the time Mitchell got 1? Im sure we could do some maths there too.

Hawks and Swans both had 17 wins. Swans got 105 votes, Hawks got 72. I guess despite having equal wins during the regular season the Swans were actually nearly 50% better - despite Hawks and Swans being 1 - 1 head to head.

Because the Brownlow tells us exactly how good players are. And exactly how good teams are.
 

DapperJong

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Posts
34,749
Likes
63,689
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Juventus
So Kennedy got 10 votes in the time Mitchell got 1? Im sure we could do some maths there too.

Hawks and Swans both had 17 wins. Swans got 105 votes, Hawks got 72. I guess despite having equal wins during the regular season the Swans were actually nearly 50% better - despite Hawks and Swans being 1 - 1 head to head.

Because the Brownlow tells us exactly how good players are. And exactly how good teams are.
You used the Kennedy example to highlight that Kennedy is obviously a better player but had only 2 votes because apparently the Brownlow isn't a good representation of how good a player is. So why now are you talking about team results? Why do you insist on trying to justify your horrible argument?
 

HairyO

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Posts
17,409
Likes
18,233
AFL Club
Hawthorn
You used the Kennedy example to highlight that Kennedy is obviously a better player but had only 2 votes because apparently the Brownlow isn't a good representation of how good a player is. So why now are you talking about team results? Why do you insist on trying to justify your horrible argument?
Because the Brownlow is not a good indicator of either team or individual performance? And hasnt been for a couple of decades, once umpires decided they generally only cared about midfielders?

If the Brownlow is a good indicator, the Swans should be offering Mitchell similar money to Kennedy? Instead they want him to take a pay cut. Maybe someone should let Longmire know how well he did last night.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom