Confirmed Tom Mitchell [traded to Hawthorn with pick 57 for pick 14 & 52]

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

DapperJong

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Posts
34,788
Likes
63,739
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Juventus
I'm more than happy to quote all your insistent and definitive posts that he was staying but I really don't want to embarrass you anymore. So we'll leave it at that.
So excuse me while I get back in my box.
Do you understand context? Clearly not. You're embarrassing yourself, no one else. I've been happy to tell people what I know as info has come to light, but you are happy to attack a poster when it doesn't suit, and now you're smug because I've "changed my tune". Please.
 

Hodgey 15

Club Legend
Joined
Aug 2, 2013
Posts
1,339
Likes
2,883
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Do you understand context? Clearly not. You're embarrassing yourself, no one else. I've been happy to tell people what I know as info has come to light, but you are happy to attack a poster when it doesn't suit, and now you're smug because I've "changed my tune". Please.
And as always you have to have the last say.
 

Kangaroos4eva

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Posts
36,423
Likes
60,292
Location
NSW
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
West Ham United
Posters need to stop throwing up trade scenarios that involve the Swans getting a player. The reason Mitchell could be leaving is because of cap space. They'll want picks only. Which I hope is our pick 12.
Or our pick 11.;)

But I doubt we would be chasing him as well as doubt he'll go to any non-Victorian club in a trade situation.
 

cdcanman

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Posts
3,099
Likes
3,607
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Do you understand context? Clearly not. You're embarrassing yourself, no one else. I've been happy to tell people what I know as info has come to light, but you are happy to attack a poster when it doesn't suit, and now you're smug because I've "changed my tune". Please.
You misspelled assume.
The sentence should read, 'I've been happy to tell people what I assume as info has come to light...'
Fixed :thumbsu:
 

cdcanman

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Posts
3,099
Likes
3,607
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Or our pick 11.;)

But I doubt we would be chasing him as well as doubt he'll go to any non-Victorian club in a trade situation.
Last thing NM need is another slow ball winner. Pretty sure you have 47 of those already.
O'Meara would have been a good fit. Pearce Hanley would be great also
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

cdcanman

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Posts
3,099
Likes
3,607
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Do you guys care more about what's going on with Mitchell or my posting? Serious question.
I'm certainly not going to find out anything about what is going on with Mitchell by reading your posts.
Please enlighten us more with all that you 'know' about the situation that the rest of us don't.
 

DapperJong

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 11, 2015
Posts
34,788
Likes
63,739
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Juventus
I'm certainly not going to find out anything about what is going on with Mitchell by reading your posts.
Please enlighten us more with all that you 'know' about the situation that the rest of us don't.
Dude, many times on this forum I've been right with swans stuff. I don't need to prove myself to you, many on here will back me up. Now, regarding Mitchell, things changed due to the GF result. That's all I'm saying. So if you want to score imaginary points in your head by taking issue with it, thumbs up to you.
 

robs_drunk

All Australian
Joined
Apr 14, 2009
Posts
678
Likes
471
AFL Club
Hawthorn
here's a little thinking,

Barlow and something to GC from Freo for pick 22

Freo Pick 22 to Hawks for Hill

Hawks pick 14 and 32 to GC for JOM

Hawks 2017 first round to Sydney for TMitch
 
Last edited:

cdcanman

Premiership Player
Joined
Sep 25, 2013
Posts
3,099
Likes
3,607
AFL Club
Hawthorn
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
Dude, many times on this forum I've been right with swans stuff. I don't need to prove myself to you, many on here will back me up. Now, regarding Mitchell, things changed due to the GF result. That's all I'm saying. So if you want to score imaginary points in your head by taking issue with it, thumbs up to you.
And yet you spent time completing this post. :rolleyes:
And then tried to prove yourself by referring to people who will back you up, and how you've been right in the past. But you don't need to prove anything.

You spend your entire time on these forums trying to be some sort of forum hero, craving credit and kudos by feigning 'inside info' from 'sources'. It's your clear MO, but you don't need to prove yourself :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

Wayne Swan

Premium Gold
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Posts
1,475
Likes
2,001
AFL Club
Sydney
Please note that IF Tom Mitchell leaves the SWans it's because of a Salary Cap squeeze and in that situation NO Hawks player will be part of the deal because any Hawks player that we would find of value will cost as much as Tom Mitchell so derrrrrr, any trade of Mitchell to the Hawks will involve a pick/picks that the Hawks currently do not have.

Plus the first priority for the Hawks is to get O'Meara and I can't see how they even get that deal done.

Mitchell either stays or goes to a club that can offer suitable picks.
 

Kangaroos4eva

Hall of Famer
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Posts
36,423
Likes
60,292
Location
NSW
AFL Club
North Melbourne
Other Teams
West Ham United
Dude, many times on this forum I've been right with swans stuff. I don't need to prove myself to you, many on here will back me up. Now, regarding Mitchell, things changed due to the GF result. That's all I'm saying. So if you want to score imaginary points in your head by taking issue with it, thumbs up to you.
All hail the all knowing leader of North Korea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom