Traded Tom Mitchell [traded to Hawthorn with pick 57 for pick 14 & 52]

[Since 2001]

Mitchell looks a player gone now.
Its just a wait to see who.

 

[HeHateMe]

He will sign with hawthorn now. Was let down big time today by a few players who are on massive coin. Why should he take unders to compensate for them.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

 

[PAFCsince1870]

Just played his way out of Sydney's salary cap.

Won't be the last casualty of that incredulous Lance Franklin contract.

 

[TallyHawk]

They needed to win clearances but went with Jack and Hanna's even after Tom got them back in the game in the 2nd, he is gone.

 

[dunno4]

You wouldn't go out of your way to hold onto him after today.

Still worth a late first though. Every club would offer their second so unless in bottom 4 a second is too low.

 

[Rich01]

You wouldn't go out of your way to hold onto him after today.

Still worth a late first though. Every club would offer their second so unless in bottom 4 a second is too low.

Wow. So only worth a tad more than Witts?

 

[DapperJong]

With the result of the GF, it's anyone's guess.

 

[dunno4]

Wow. So only worth a tad more than Witts?

That assumes I am in the 'Witts is worth a second' camp!

I would say 25 pick higher. You slide the dial where you want it from there to get an answer that works for you.

I think Mitchell 10 to 25. Therefore Witts 35-50.

 

[Furn2]

Yeah straight swap for Hill is breaking our balls.

 

[JG22]

He was huge today, he's worth quite a bit more than hawthorns future first pick or this years first.

 

[Rimmer]

Player of the final series and Sydney have painted themselves in such a corner they cannot afford to keep him. The bean counters in Sydney should be strung up to the nearest tree.

 

[Since 2001]

You wouldn't go out of your way to hold onto him after today.

Still worth a late first though. Every club would offer their second so unless in bottom 4 a second is too low.

seriously? 26 disposals, 2 goals and 13 tackles easily in their top 3 players today. they would be crazy not to fight for him.

 

[Accepted 04]

Pick 6 & Ben Lennon for Tom Mitchell and Sam Naismith


Sent from my iPhone

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Today didn't really change Tom's value. He's still a player that is being pushed out of a club due to salary restraints.

Will nominate a club and will go there for a late first rounder or equivalent player.


Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk

 

[grimlock]

Pick 6 & Ben Lennon for Tom Mitchell and Sam Naismith


Sent from my iPhone

You've gone cold on Prestia already?

 

[prodigy]

You've gone cold on Prestia already?

Prestia 2017 first round pick.
We are also more likely to get Nankervis than Naismith.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Two Planks]

How is Prestia worth pick 6 and Tom Mitchell a late 1st rounder. Mitchell younger and a better player.

 

[HairyO]

How is Prestia worth pick 6 and Tom Mitchell a late 1st rounder. Mitchell younger and a better player.

Look at the cattle Prestia works with. Will be far better suited to the Tigs... who love to pay overs.

 

[Steven Tyler]

Today didn't really change Tom's value. He's still a player that is being pushed out of a club due to salary restraints.

Will nominate a club and will go there for a late first rounder or equivalent player.


Sent from my SM-N910G using Tapatalk

If they can't afford to pay Mitchell what he's worth, they aren't getting an equivalent player in a trade
Swans will get a decent draft pick for Mitchell, as it helps ease their salary cap

 

[HeHateMe]

Sydney can't afford an equivalent player. This trade will be done in the early stages of trade week.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk

 

[beta_condition]

If they can't afford to pay Mitchell what he's worth, they aren't getting an equivalent player in a trade
Swans will get a decent draft pick for Mitchell, as it helps ease their salary cap

This is what people don't understand, Sydney are only putting Mitchell on the trade table due to cap pressure, getting a equivalent player wont help them. Best draft pick on offer gets him.

 

[Gee Class Loco]

Just played his way out of Sydney's salary cap.

Won't be the last casualty of that incredulous Lance Franklin contract.

I think Tippets is worse.... $800k vs $950k. I know which one i'd be happy with.

 

[PAFCsince1870]

I think Tippets is worse.... $800k vs $950k. I know which one i'd be happy with.

Franklin's is backended I believe, increasing each year until he's paid $1.5 million at age 35.

Crazy stuff, even if that figure is inflated.

 

[Rich01]

That assumes I am in the 'Witts is worth a second' camp!

I would say 25 pick higher. You slide the dial where you want it from there to get an answer that works for you.

I think Mitchell 10 to 25.

On that line of thinking the Vickery compo may just be enough to get TMitch to the Tigers.

 

[Gee Class Loco]

Franklin's is backended I believe, increasing each year until he's paid $1.5 million at age 35.

Crazy stuff, even if that figure is inflated.

Haven't heard that... i think i saw something like 1.1 mil... in year 10. But... Considering the new EBA thats due....
Still will be 10% of the total player payments by then. Still a good deal for what he has bought to Sydney. Without him they wouldn't of even made those to Grand Finals.... So in that sense, it was a great investment in terms of win-loss and exposure in the Sydney market.