Remove this Banner Ad

Scandal Tom Silvagni convicted of rape

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Steve Van Apren is Australia’s foremost expert in Polygraph use.

Even he will tell you it’s a tool to look for ‘potential irregularities’ in a person’s story - it is NOT a definitive ‘guilt detector’.

It’s used in in conjunction with Behavioural Interviewing, Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) of the written word and later, Interrogative interviewing, to identify

  • a potential liar,
  • target the time,place or circumstance of the event and possible anomalies &
  • to re-enforce commitment to an interrogation of the events.

None of these skills are foolproof, but they are valuable assets.
it’s nonsense tech and shouldn’t be let within 1000 miles of real evidence.
 
I'm sure that the Silvagni family believe he is innocent. So I don't see them as rape apologists.

I haven't seen all the evidence, but I've got no reason to believe the jury didn't get it right. Perhaps they will change their minds over time. The parents are in a horrific no win situation. They should have just issued a generic "we support our son" statement. Saying they believe in their son's innocence by default means they are callin the victim a liar.
Interesting that silvagnis girlfriend has absolutely stood by him since the rape event. And the victim is reported to be a friend of hers. He has certainly convinced her of his innocence.
 
Steve Van Apren is Australia’s foremost expert in Polygraph use.

Even he will tell you it’s a tool to look for ‘potential irregularities’ in a person’s story - it is NOT a definitive ‘guilt detector’.

It’s used in in conjunction with Behavioural Interviewing, Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) of the written word and later, Interrogative interviewing, to identify

  • a potential liar,
  • target the time,place or circumstance of the event and possible anomalies &
  • to re-enforce commitment to an interrogation of the events.

None of these skills are foolproof, but they are valuable assets.
You say society is ****ed, while advocating for pseudoscience to be used on people in criminal trials.

That's boomer logic on a scale rarely seen on bigfooty.
 
Interesting that silvagnis girlfriend has absolutely stood by him since the rape event. And the victim is reported to be a friend of hers. He has certainly convinced her of his innocence.

I wonder where she was, and if she was awake when he went into another room for how ever long it was. Granted it's a big house. Did she testify? I didn't read anything about that happening.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I’m trying to think of what it is he’s told his parents and what it is he’s told his girlfriend for them both to believe in him.
It’s obviously a different version of events.

Could it be:.?
The Bruce Lehrmann defence.
“Didn’t happen”

Could it be..?
I am a grubby barista.d, but I’m not a f.ckn grubby bastard
“I went into her bedroom and she worked out it was me and she left but I didn’t get to do the fkd up things I was thinking about doing”

Did he say he went into the room in the court?
 
Tom is clearly a narcissist. Could have admitted he was at fault and gone about trying to heal the damage he'd done, apologise, work on himself and try to become a better person, accept the consequences of his actions whatever they may be.

Instead he drags the poor victim further through the mud and brings his whole family along for the ride.

Now he's dug himself in so deeply with his lies he probably feels he has no choice but to keep digging.

Can understand that from him, but surprising that his parents are going to burn further hundreds of gorillas on his inability to accept responsibility for his wrongdoing.
 
I’m trying to think of what it is he’s told his parents and what it is he’s told his girlfriend for them both to believe in him.
It’s obviously a different version of events.

Could it be:.?
The Bruce Lehrmann defence.
“Didn’t happen”

Could it be..?
I am a grubby barista.d, but I’m not a f.ckn grubby bastard
“I went into her bedroom and she worked out it was me and she left but I didn’t get to do the fkd up things I was thinking about doing”

Did he say he went into the room in the court?

Probably said something like he went to check on her and one thing lead to another, they hooked up, he panicked because he just cheated on his gf and dogged his mate, she regretted it instantly and accused him of rape & made up a story instead.

Dunno about the uber receipt though.
 
I’m trying to think of what it is he’s told his parents and what it is he’s told his girlfriend for them both to believe in him.
It’s obviously a different version of events.

Could it be:.?
The Bruce Lehrmann defence.
“Didn’t happen”

Could it be..?
I am a grubby barista.d, but I’m not a f.ckn grubby bastard
“I went into her bedroom and she worked out it was me and she left but I didn’t get to do the fkd up things I was thinking about doing”

Did he say he went into the room in the court?

I'm fairly certain he has maintained he never went into her room.
 
Probably said something like he went to check on her and one thing lead to another, they hooked up, he panicked because he just cheated on his gf and dogged his mate, she regretted it instantly and accused him of rape & made up a story instead.

Dunno about the uber receipt though.
But then there’s the ph call with the cops listening.
I don’t reckon that’s what happened
 
Can understand that from him, but surprising that his parents are going to burn further hundreds of gorillas on his inability to accept responsibility for his wrongdoing.
I dont want any gorillas burnt - Dame Valerie Jane Morris Goodall & Sir David Attenborough would be horrified - WTF has happened to this thread ffs !!!

Tom is guilty as at today - everybody calm the f**k down - Perthites are excused - it's 38c in the shade here - we've all got sunstroke
 
I only saw that in the phone call he told her to drop it. Do we know what else was captured on the call?
The coppers would only charge him if they thought there was enough evidence to charge him.
I don’t know what was in the ph call or when the ph call was given to the def.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The coppers would only charge him if they thought there was enough evidence to charge him.
I don’t know what was in the ph call or when the ph call was given to the def.

There's a bit in here (yes I know it's the DM).

The girlfriend did testify that the ex-best friend/guy who slept with the victim came into the room Tom and her were in and asked for a condom, as in he was still in the house and didn't leave when he said he did.

So she lied on the stand as well.

 
For the record , he's been found guilty and I'm satisfied with that but I'm reading a lot about the Uber receipt aspect leading to damning evidence of guilt but there is scenario where there could be a plausible reason for tampering with it. She accuses him of rape, he panics and tries to cover his ass out of sheer fear of where it could go. I dont buy into this being definitive proof of wrongdoing. People panic and do stupid things under pressure. Anyhow, just another way of looking at it, as I said, I'm happy he has been found guilty but there is more to it than just the uber receipt.
 
For the record , he's been found guilty and I'm satisfied with that but I'm reading a lot about the Uber receipt aspect leading to damning evidence of guilt but there is scenario where there could be a plausible reason for tampering with it. She accuses him of rape, he panics and tries to cover his ass out of sheer fear of where it could go. I dont buy into this being definitive proof of wrongdoing. People panic and do stupid things under pressure. Anyhow, just another way of looking at it, as I said, I'm happy he has been found guilty but there is more to it than just the uber receipt.

The uber receipt wasn't him making one for himself, he tried to doctor his mate's to show the mate was at the house longer. Basically saying his mate r*ped the victim instead of him.
 
Also did silvagni not think that Ubers booking/driver records would not be checked to corroborate his version of events? Then we have the other bloke saying he wasn't even there and finally we have the victims evidence.
Does it say anywhere how he altered the Uber receipt? I'm guessing he booked the Uber for his mate using his own account? How would he be able to edit the time on the receipt?

Also did he really think that the victims partner would back up his version of events after she accused him of rape?

Truly bizarre, I don't think he thought this through.
 
Does it say anywhere how he altered the Uber receipt? I'm guessing he booked the Uber for his mate using his own account? How would he be able to edit the time on the receipt?

Also did he really think that the victims partner would back up his version of events after she accused him of rape?

Truly bizarre, I don't think he thought this through.

He texted his mate asking for his receipt and edited it to show the mate left at 2:47 or around that time. Then sent it back to him and said just say you left later.

The mate left just before 2am and was home by 2:09am.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Does it say anywhere how he altered the Uber receipt? I'm guessing he booked the Uber for his mate using his own account? How would he be able to edit the time on the receipt?

Also did he really think that the victims partner would back up his version of events after she accused him of rape?

Truly bizarre, I don't think he thought this through.

I just shared a podcast that fills in some blanks including doctoring the uber receipt.
 
Oh get a grip on reality mate !!!!

What about children in a brain cancer ward of a hospital , or people who have lost their sight , or are living on a day to day basis that they could lose their sight - i reckon that is about 10,000 times worse than what she has gone through
The shitest take. Have a word with yourself.
 
There's a bit in here (yes I know it's the DM).

The girlfriend did testify that the ex-best friend/guy who slept with the victim came into the room Tom and her were in and asked for a condom, as in he was still in the house and didn't leave when he said he did.

So she lied on the stand as well.

DM is absolutely leading the way on covering this story, detailed
 
In addition the defense is already pushing the good family, good home, good rehabilitation prospects.

They’ll be pushing for some sort of non custodial sentence and frankly it wouldn’t shock me if it went that way.

Judges seem to think that any sort of circumstance is ground for lenient sentencing now. Good home, good rehabilitation prospects, no jail time, bad home and upbringing, never stood a chance, no jail time.

I hope I’m wrong.
It’s going to be a prison sentence. He was placed in custody after the conviction last week and the judge said a prison sentence was inevitable.

Notwithstanding the crime he has committed, I think the best place for him at the moment would be prison. I think if he was released he might do the unthinkable. 2 days on the front page of the paper, social media etc I would probably do the same.
 
Does it say anywhere how he altered the Uber receipt? I'm guessing he booked the Uber for his mate using his own account? How would he be able to edit the time on the receipt?

Also did he really think that the victims partner would back up his version of events after she accused him of rape?

Truly bizarre, I don't think he thought this through.

You'd be amazed how easy it is to edit screenshots or pdfs of things. Can use Microsoft paint even.
 
For the record , he's been found guilty and I'm satisfied with that but I'm reading a lot about the Uber receipt aspect leading to damning evidence of guilt but there is scenario where there could be a plausible reason for tampering with it. She accuses him of rape, he panics and tries to cover his ass out of sheer fear of where it could go. I dont buy into this being definitive proof of wrongdoing. People panic and do stupid things under pressure. Anyhow, just another way of looking at it, as I said, I'm happy he has been found guilty but there is more to it than just the uber receipt.
Whilst I don’t agree at all with the sentiment of his actions being in panic not covering up, it’s also a bit moot, it’s not the only evidence (clearly) as you note at the end. If there is a literal mountain of it (which there generally has to be to get a conviction in a rape case) then it’s pretty pointless to pick pretty outrageous holes in one bit.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Scandal Tom Silvagni convicted of rape

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top