Tom Stewart bump on Noah Anderson

[Muddiemoose]

Was a clean bump imo

AFL could roll out the potential to cause injury if they wanted to send a message but I don’t think they should

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Serious question.
If Stewart is a thug for his one bump on Prestia which was horrible then what is Houston?

Serious answer.
Who cares!

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Please explain the history of being a thug.

Once a murderer always a murderer!

 

[Generalissimo]

I'd say Jed Walter has more of a case to answer for his late head-high hit on O'Connor than Stewart does for what was a perfectly legal bump. How that wasn't a free kick downfield puzzles me.

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Arguing with stupid always frustrates me.

Throwing around the term “thug” when your own team has a history of them is pretty rich and goes to show you have a fish brain.

Ballantine, Carr, Solomon, Crowley.
The list goes on.

Derailing a legitimate thread!

 

[WilloTree]

Injury doesnt impact whether its graded high. Whether the hit was high determines whether it is graded high.

'High' can mean both Impact and Contact (see below). I've already posted the classifications table. Would help if you read what was posted.

 

[PhatBoy]

Exactly. Why didn't he try to get it

Um, because you can lay a shepherd to allow a teammate to do the same

 

[PhatBoy]

Derailing a legitimate thread!

Shit thread is shit

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Shit thread is shit

You would know all about that!

 

[PhatBoy]

You would know all about that!

Well no, I wouldn’t. I don’t start threads outside of the cricket board and they aren’t open demonstrations of how I fundamentally don’t understand the sport.

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Well no, I wouldn’t. I don’t start threads outside of the cricket board and they aren’t open demonstrations of how I fundamentally don’t understand the sport.

 

[PhatBoy]

A gif. Good argument.

Tell us again how a player lays a shepherd into an opponent’s ribs, his opponent doesn’t get a head injury, and the ‘offender’ should be suspended for….

Hang on what should he be suspended for again? Being too rough?

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

A gif. Good argument.

Tell us again how a player lays a shepherd into an opponent’s ribs, his opponent doesn’t get a head injury, and the ‘offender’ should be suspended for….

Hang on what should he be suspended for again? Being too rough?

The gif was on point with your line of posts!

Wow, an actually question in direct correlation to the topic, good one!

 

[Adelaide Hawk]

I'd like to think the AFL thinks there's nothing to see here, but who knows what they are likely to do?

 

[PhatBoy]

The gif was on point with your line of posts!

Wow, an actually question in direct correlation to the topic, good one!

The gif was on point with your OP if anything. Go follow another sport or petition them to remove any semblance of physicality from this one.

 

[Skeppersap]

The gif was on point with your line of posts!

Wow, an actually question in direct correlation to the topic, good one!

Yet no answer from yourself I see ...

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Yet no answer from yourself I see ...

Everything's in the OP.

The gif was on point with your OP if anything. Go follow another sport or petition them to remove any semblance of physicality from this one.

Maybe go outside if the internet is too much for you. Being this upset over a thread is unhealthy!

 

[PhatBoy]

Everything's in the OP.



Maybe go outside if the internet is too much for you. Being this upset over a thread is unhealthy!

Mate your post is the literal definition of someone who sits at a desk oblivious to physical sporting collision.

 

[420]

I hate geelong and want that entire club & town to fall into the abyss BUT there is no suspension here, it's a perfect bump

 

[boncer34]

Arguing with stupid always frustrates me.

Throwing around the term “thug” when your own team has a history of them is pretty rich and goes to show you have a fish brain.

Ballantine, Carr, Solomon, Crowley.
The list goes on.

He didn't use the term thug.

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Mate your post is the literal definition of someone who sits at a desk oblivious to physical sporting collision.

Now, where's that leave Brittany alone gif.

 

[bzparkes]

Wasn't high, shouldn't be suspended but if the AFL want to use the 'potential to cause injury' line when assessing incidents and let Stewart off, then they owe Harley Reid a groveling apology for his suspension last year.

 

[LOLchie Schultz]

Strange thing about this thread is, if you take all the Geelong campaigners out, there is a very real argument happening.

 

[Wojcinski]

He didn't use the term thug.

It's well known that Stewart is a thug with a history

 

[Wojcinski]

Freo fans were cheering this type of behavior not that long ago:



Seems like they've really softened up